:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:風險性資本與銀行效率之分析
書刊名:管理與系統
作者:陳玉涓 引用關係邱永和 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-chuanChiu, Yung-ho
出版日期:2007
卷期:14:4
頁次:頁519-543
主題關鍵詞:巴塞爾資本協定資本適足率資料包絡法銀行效率風險BaselCapital adequacyData envelopment analysisEfficiencyRisk
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:37
本文以Basel Ⅱ的風險性應計提資本(Risk-Based Capital Requirement)及最低資本適足要求(Minimal Capital Adequacy Requirement),作為衡量銀行風險的客觀指標,並利用本指標估算考量風險下之金融機構效率。本文研究樣本為29家本國商業銀行,研究期間為民國91年至民國93年。本研究第一階段採用Basel Ⅱ之標準法,並利用各銀行公佈之資本適足率,估算本國銀行之信用風險、市場風險、作業風險、及調整後資本適足率,以作為第二階段效率分析之風險投入變數;第二階段則利用資料包絡法、修正的資料包絡法、及差額變數基礎之超效率評估模型,解決效率值排名問題,並估算經風險調整前、後之本國銀行效率,而後討論本國銀行之規模效率及影響效率表現之因子。本文實證結果顯示:(1)市場風險應計提資本有逐年上升的趨勢;而信用風險佔總風險性資產比率逐年下降。(2)經風險調整後之本國銀行效率值高於調整前之本國銀行效率值。(3)低風險銀行之平均效率值高於高風險銀行之平均效率值。(4)本國商業銀行已無法依靠傳統的放款業務支撐其生存,應多致力於傳統銀行業務外之其他營業收入擴展,且積極的進行風險管理。
In this paper, we adopt DEA method and SBM method to estimate bank efficiency based on the information obtained from 29 banks in Taiwan for the period from 2002 to 2004. In the first stage, we employ the standard method of Basel Ⅱ to calculate the risk as input variables for efficiency analysis. In the second stage, we employ the BCC (Banker-Charnes-Cooper), Super-Efficiency, and Super-SBM to estimate the scores relating bank efficiency which are incorporating account the risk. Our empirical results are summarized as follows: (1) The market risk is proven to be more important in recent years. The credit risk is the highest ratio of total risky capital, but the ratio decreases in recent years. Most of the adjusted capital adequacy are large than 8% in Taiwan. (2) The average efficiency scores of banks incorporating the risk are significantly higher than those of banks not incorporating the internal risk. (3) The average efficiency score of low-risk banks is large than the high-risk banks. (4) Taiwan's commercial banking industry need to be paid high attention in non- operating income and risk management in order to improve the bank's profit.
期刊論文
1.Drake, L. M.、Hall, M. J. B.(2003)。Efficiency in Japanese banking: An empirical analysis。Journal of Banking and Finance,27(5),891-917。  new window
2.Farrier, G. D.、Lovell, C. A. K.(1990)。Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking。Journal of Econometrics,46,229-245。  new window
3.Hughes, J. P.、Mester, J. L.(1993)。A Quality and Risk-Adjusted Cost Function for Banks: Evidence on the Too-Big-Fail Doctrine。Journal of Productivity Analysis,4(3),293-315。  new window
4.Färe, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Weber, W. L.(2004)。The Effect of Risk-based Capital Requirements on Profit Efficiency in Banking。Applied Economics,36(15),1731-1743。  new window
5.Xue, Mei、Harker, Patrick T.(2002)。Note: Ranking DMUs with Infeasible Super-efficiency DEA Models。Management Science,48(5),705-710。  new window
6.Pastor, J. M.(2002)。Credit Risk and Efficiency in the European Banking System: A Three-Stage Analysis。Applied Financial Economics,12,859-911。  new window
7.Altunbas, Y.、Liu, M. H.、Molyneux, P.、Seth, Rama(2000)。Efficiency and Risk in Japanese Banking。Journal of Banking and Finance,24(10),1605-1628。  new window
8.Berger, A. N.、DeYoung, R.(1997)。Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks。Journal of Banking and Finance,21,849-870。  new window
9.Bhattacharyya, A.、Lovell, C. A. K.、Sahay, Pankaj(1997)。The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks。European Journal of Operational Research,98(2),332-345。  new window
10.Resti, Andrea(1997)。Evaluating the Cost Efficiency of the Italian Banking System: What Can be Learned from the Joint Application of Parametric and Non-parametric Techniques。Journal of Banking and Finance,21(2),221-250。  new window
11.McAllister, P. H.、McManus, D. A.(1993)。Resolving the scale efficiency puzzle in banking。Journal of Banking and Finance,17(2/3),389-405。  new window
12.Thrall, R. M.(1996)。Duality, Classification and Slacks in DEA。Annals of Operations Research,66(2),109-138。  new window
13.Tone, Kaoru(2002)。A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis。European Journal of Operational Research,143(1),32-41。  new window
14.Andersen, Per、Petersen, Niels Christian(1993)。A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis。Management Science,39(10),1261-1264。  new window
15.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
16.Tone, Kaoru(2001)。A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis。European Journal of Operational Research,130(3),498-509。  new window
17.徐守德、廖四郎、王毓敏、葉正乾(19990300)。臺灣地區商業銀行的技術性效率研究。亞太經濟管理評論,2(2),23-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Chang, Ching Cheng(1999)。The Nonparametric Risk-Adjusted Efficiency Measurement: An Application to Taiwan's Major Rural Financial Intermediaries。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,81(4),902-913。  new window
19.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
20.Hughes, J. P.、Mester, L. J.、Moon, Choon-Geol(2001)。Are Scale Economies in Banking Elusive or Illusive? Evidence Obtained by Incorporating Capital Structure and Risk-Taking into Models of Bank Production。Journal of Banking & Finance,25,2169-2208。  new window
21.Yeh, T. L.、Chen, T. Y.(2000)。A Measurement of Bank Efficiency, Ownership and Productivity Change。The Service Industries Journal,20,95-109。  new window
22.Cebenoyan, A. S.、Cooperman, E. S.、Register, C. A.(1993)。Firm Efficiency and the Regulatory Closure of S&Ls: An Empirical Investigation。The Review of Economics and Statistics,75,540-545。  new window
23.Dickson, D. C. M.(1994)。An Upper Bound for the Probability of Ultimate Ruin。Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,2,131-138。  new window
24.Huang, T. H.、Wang, M. H.(2000)。Comparison of Economic Efficiency Estimation Methods: Parametric and Non-parametric Techniques。The Manchester School,70,682-709。  new window
25.Pastor, J. M.(1999)。Efficiency and Risk Management in Bank Firms: A Method to Decompose Risk。Applied Financial Economics,9,371-384。  new window
26.Fan, L.、Shaffe, S.(2004)。Efficiency versus Risk in Large Domestic US Bank。Managerial Finance,30,1-19。  new window
27.Seiford, L. M.、Zhu, J.(1999)。Infeasibility of Super-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Models。INFORS,37,174-187。  new window
28.Hughes, J. P.(1999)。Measuring Efficiency when Competitive Prices Aggregate Differences in Product Quality and Risk。Research in Economics,53(1),47-76。  new window
29.Drekic, S.、Willmot, G. E.(2003)。On the Density and Moments of the Time of Ruin with Exponentual Claims。Astin Bulletin,33,11-21。  new window
30.Zhu, J.(1996)。Robustness of the Efficient DMUs in Data Envelopment Analysis。European Journal of Operational Research,90,451-460。  new window
31.Cai, J.、Garrido, J.(1999)。Two-sided Bounds for Ruin-probabilities when the Adjustment Coefficient Does Not Exit。Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,1,89-92。  new window
研究報告
1.Bell, F.、Murphy, N.(1976)。Costs in Commercial Banking: A Quantitative Analysis of Bank Behavior and Its Relation to Bank Regulation。Boston, MA。  new window
學位論文
1.高蘭芬(1990)。資本資產定價模式於臺灣股票市場之實證研究--概度比檢定之應用(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學商學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳金舜(2004)。金融控股公司下銀行與獨立銀行之績效評估比較(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐萬爐(2001)。台灣地區商業銀行效率之研究--應用資料包絡分析法(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪修遠(1996)。商業銀行財務績效之研究--DEA與因素分析法之比較(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡琇娟(2000)。銀行業資訊科技應用對經營績效之影響(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊明栽(1997)。資本資產定價理論在臺灣股票市場之實證研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
7.杜相如(2002)。臺灣地區銀行業市場結構、行為與績效之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
8.王嘉樸(1987)。資本資產定價模式於臺灣證券市場之實證研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳坤明(1996)。臺灣地區銀行業經營效率之實證研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
10.柯慈儀(2001)。臺灣地區商業銀行無效率因素之分析,0。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳棟貴(2003)。我國金融控股公司經營績效之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭鴻龍(2003)。銀行經營效率影響之研究-資訊化與組織結構,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE