Corpus and the Nature of Grammar Revisited__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Corpus and the Nature of Grammar Revisited
書刊名：	Concentric: Studies in Linguistics
作者：	何萬順／萬依萍
作者(外文)：	Her, One-soon／Wan, I-ping
出版日期：	2007
卷期：	33:1
頁次：	頁67-111
主題關鍵詞：	衍生語法學；功能語言學；語料庫語言學；心理語言學；Generative grammar；Functional grammar；Psycholinguistics；Corpus linguistics；Innateness；Autonomous syntax
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:11 點閱:98

Shei (2004) 最重要的兩項主張是：一、心理語言學與生物學研究
的相關證據顯示衍生語法學是不可信的，二、詞彙的重要性很可能超
過句法；因此語料庫語言學在語法研究上才是較為可行的。本文是對
該文的這些論點一一做出回應。我們首先釐清衍生語法學的部分觀點
及其現況，並且指出該文論證之不足。本文所提出的相對主張是：一、
現有的證據足以顯示衍生語法學是一個值得探索的科學理論，二、衍
生語言學與功能語言學或語料庫語言學並不是必然衝突的；本文最終
的目的在於證明若要瞭解人類的個別語言以及普遍語法，這兩種不同
的理論及其研究方法都是必要的。

以文找文

This paper is a response to Shei (2004), where the author makes two main claims:
(1) the generative grammar is implausible based on evidence from psycholinguistic and
biological studies, and (2) lexicon may prove to outweigh syntax and corpus linguistics
is thus a more viable alternative. By clarifying some of the generativist views and the
current state of affairs and also pointing out some of the inconsistencies in Shei’s
arguments, we aim to defend the generative paradigm as a worthy scientific pursuit
and, more importantly, also to demonstrate that the generativist approach does not
necessarily conflict with the functionalist approach in general or the corpus-based
methodologies in particular. We maintain that both approaches may be necessary for a
comprehensive view of language and languages.

以文找文

Other
1.	Ritter, Nancy(2002)。Introduction。
2.	Fillmore, Charles(1992)。"Corpus Linguistics" or "Computer-Aided Armchair Linguistics"。

期刊論文
1.	Cavalli-Sfirza, L. L.、Piazza, A.、Menozzi, P.、Mountain, J.(1988)。Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archeological, and linguistic data。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，85，6002-6006。
2.	Tsai, Mei-chih、Huang, Chu-ren、Chen, Keh-jiann、Ahrens, Kathleen(19980200)。Towards a Representation of Verbal Semantics: An Approach Based on Near-Synonyms。International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing，3(1)，61-74。
3.	Goldberg, Adele E.、Jackendoff, Ray(2004)。The English resultative as a family of constructions。Language，80(3)，523-568。
4.	Fillmore, Charles J.、Kay, Paul、O'Connor, Mary Catherine(1988)。Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone。Language，64(3)，501-538。
5.	Kay, Paul、Fillmore, Charles J.(1999)。Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What's X Doing Y? Construction。Language，75(1)，1-33。
6.	Cowley, S. J.(2001)。The baby, the bathwater and the "language instinct" debate。Language Sciences，23，69-91。
7.	Grodzinsky, Yosef(2000)。The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca‘s area。The Behavioral and Brain Sciences，23(1)，1-71。
8.	Ji, Sungchul(1997)。Isomorphism between cell and human languages: molecular biological, bioinformatics and linguistic implications。BioSystems，44，17-39。
9.	Moro, A.、Tettamanti, M.、Perani, D.、Donati, C.、Cappa, S. F.、Fazio, F.(2001)。Syntax and the brain: disentangling grammar by selective anomalies。NeuroImage，13，110-118。
10.	Muller, R.-A.、Kleinhans, N.、Courchesne, E.(2003)。Linguistic theory and neuroimaging evidence: An fMRI study of Broca‘s area in lexical semantics。Neuropsychologia，41，1199-1207。
11.	Pinker, S.、Bloom, P.(1990)。Natural language and natural selection。The Behavioral and Brain Sciences，13，707-784。
12.	Ullman, Michael T.、Corkin, Suzanne、Coppola, Marie、Hickok, Gregory、Growdon, John H.(199703)。A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system。Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience，9(2)，266-276。
13.	Bever, Thomas G.、McElree, Brian(1988)。Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension。Linguistic Inquiry，19，35-43。
14.	Bickerton, Derek(2007)。Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists。Lingua，117，510-526。
15.	Bresnan, Joan、Aissen, Judith(2002)。Functionality and optimality: Objections and refutations。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory，20，81-95。
16.	張顯達(2003)。Memory capacity in school-age Mandarin-speaking children with specific language impairment。臺灣語言學期刊，1，111-120。
17.	何萬順、Higinbotham, Dan、Pentheroudakis, Joseph(1991)。An LFG-based machine translation system。Computer Processing of Chinese and Oriental Language，5(3/4)，285-297。
18.	何萬順、Higinbotham, Dan、Pentheroudakis, Joseph(1994)。Lexical and idiomatic transfer in machine translation : An LFG approach。Research in Humanities Computing，3，200-216。
19.	何萬順(2005)。'Driving' towards simplicity: In (partial)defense of the 'armchair linguist'。Journal of Language and Linguistics，4(1)，56-73。
20.	McElree, Brian、Bever, Thomas G.(1989)。The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research，18，21-35。
21.	紐邁耶(1991)。Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language。Language and Communication，11，3-28。
22.	Newmeyer, Frederick J.(2003)。Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage。Language，79(4)，682-707。
23.	Plomin, Robert、DeFries, John(1998)。The genetics of cognitive abilities and disabilities。Scientific American，278，40-47。
24.	解志強(2004)。Corpus and grammar: What it isn't。同心圓：語言學研究，30，1-18。延伸查詢

學位論文
1.	Her, One-Soon(1990)。Grammatical Functions and Verb Subcategorization in Mandarin Chinese(博士論文)。University of Hawaii。
2.	黃正德(1982)。Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。

圖書
1.	Hopper, Paul J.、Bybee, Joan L.(2001)。Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure。Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。
2.	Sells, P.(1985)。Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories。Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories。Stanford, CA。
3.	Miller, Geoffrey(2000)。The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature。The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature。New York。
4.	Sells, P.(2001)。Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax。Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax。Stanford, CA。
5.	Barsky, Robert F.(1997)。Noam Chomsky: A Life of Dissent。Cambridge, Mass.：MIT Press。
6.	Jenkins, Lyle(2000)。Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language。Cambridge。
7.	Schutze, Carson T.(1996)。The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology。Chicago。
8.	Nirenburg, S.、Somers, H. L.、Wilks, Yorick(2003)。Readings in machine translation。Cambridge, Mass.。
9.	Biber, Douglas、Conrad, Susan、Reppen, Randi(1998)。Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use。Cambridge University Press。
10.	Smith, Neil V.、Tsimpli, Ianthi-maria(1995)。The Mind of A Savant: Language Learning and Modularity。Oxford：Blackwell。
11.	Stubbs, Michael(2002)。Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics。Oxford：Blackwell。
12.	Kennedy, Graeme(1998)。An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics。Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.。
13.	Meyer, Charles F.(2002)。English Corpus Linguistics: An introduction。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
14.	Chomsky, Noam(1975)。Reflections on Language。New York：Pantheon Books。
15.	Pinker, S.(1994)。The Language Instinct。New York：William Morrow。
16.	Chomsky, Noam(2000)。The Architecture of Language。New Delhi：Oxford：Oxford University Press。
17.	Chomsky, Noam(1986)。Knowledge of language: Its acture, origin and use。New York：Praeger。
18.	Kayne, Richard S.(1994)。The Antisymmetry of Syntax。MIT Press。
19.	Chomsky, Noam(1957)。Syntactic structures。Mouton。
20.	Chomsky, Noam(1981)。Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures。Foris Publications。
21.	Goldberg, Adele Eva(1995)。Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure。University of Chicago Press。
22.	Chomsky, Noam(1965)。Aspects of the Theory of Syntax。MIT Press。
23.	Snow, Catherine E.(1996)。Toward a rational empiricism: why interactionism is not behaviorism any more than biology is genetics。Toward a Genetics of Language。NJ。
24.	Starosta, Stanley(1987)。Generative Syntax: The Hypothetico-Deductive Science of Language。Generative Syntax: The Hypothetico-Deductive Science of Language。Taipei。
25.	Sarosta, Stanley(1988)。The Case for Lexcicase: An Outline of Lexicase Grammatical Theory。The Case for Lexcicase: An Outline of Lexicase Grammatical Theory。London。
26.	Wasow, Thomas(1985)。Postscript。Lectures on contemporary syntactic theories。Stanford, CA。
27.	Aarts, Bas(2000)。Corpus Linguistics, Chomsky and Fuzzy Tree Fragments。Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory。Amsterdam。
28.	Baker, Mark C.(1988)。Incroporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing。Incroporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing。Chicago。
29.	Bates, Elizabeth(2003)。Natura e cultura nel linguaggio。Il cervello di Homo sapiens。Rome。
30.	Brodmann, Korbinian(1999)。Brodmann's Localisation in the Cerebral Cortex。Brodmann's Localisation in the Cerebral Cortex。London。
31.	Chomsky, Noam(1955)。Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory。Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory。New York。
32.	Chomsky, Noam(2002)。On Nature and Language。On Nature and Language。Cambridge。
33.	Chomsky, Noam(2006)。Knowledge of Language。Knowledge of Language。New York。
34.	Crystal, David(1997)。The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language。Cambridge：Cambridge UP。
35.	Dingwall, Willliam O.(1998)。The biological bases of human communicative behavior。Psycholinguistics。Orlando, FL。
36.	Everett, Daniel L.(2002)。Biology and language: A consideration of alternatives (a review article of Stephen R. Anderson, and David W. Lightfoot, T.)。The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology。Cambridge。
37.	Givón, Talmy(2002)。Bio-linguistics: The Santa Barbara Lectures。Bio-linguistics: The Santa Barbara Lectures。Amsterdam。
38.	Hudson, Richard(1994)。Word Grammar。The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics(Vol.9)。Oxford。
39.	Johnson, Rod、King, Maghi、Louis des Tombe(2003)。EUROTRA: Computational techniques。Readings in machine translation。Cambridge, Mass.。
40.	Kaplan, Ronald M.、Netter, Klaus、Wedekind, Jurgen、Zaenen, Annie(2003)。Translation by structural correspondences。Readings in machine translation。Cambridge, Mass.。
41.	Landsbergen, Jan.(2003)。Montague Grammar and machine translation。Readings in machine translation。Cambridge, Mass.。
42.	Lasnik, Howard、Uriagereka, Juan、Boeckx, Cederic(2005)。A Course in Minimalist Syntax。A Course in Minimalist Syntax。Oxford。
43.	Mair, C.、Hundt, Marianne(2000)。Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory。Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory。Amsterdam。
44.	Sampson, Geoffrey(2005)。The 'Language Instinct' Debate。The 'Language Instinct' Debate。London/New York。
45.	Ratner, Bernstein、Gleason, Jean Berko、Narasimhan, Bhuvana(1998)。Introduction to psycholinguistics: What do language users know?。Psycholinguistics。Fort Worth, Tex.。
46.	Rice, Mabel(2002)。A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation。Language Competence across populations: Towards a Definition of Specific Language Impairment。Mahwah, NJ。
47.	Sampson, Geoffrey(1997)。Educating Eve: The 'Language Instinct' Debate。Educating Eve: The 'Language Instinct' Debate。London。
48.	Savage-Rumbaugh, Sue、Lewin, R.(1994)。Kanzi: The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind。Kanzi: The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind。New York。
49.	Savage-Rumbaugh, Sue(1999)。Ape language: Between a rock and a hard place。The Origins of Language: What Nonhuman primates Can Tell Us。Santa Fe。
50.	Smith, Neil(1999)。Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals。Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals。Cambridge。

其他
1.	Svartvik, Jan(1991)。Directions in Corpus Linguistics。
2.	蔡美智(1998)。Gaoxing and Kuaile-Two types of state of happiness，Edinburgh。
3.	Johnson, George(1995)。Chimp talk debate: Is it really language?，New York。
4.	Leech, Geoffrey(1991)。Corpora and theories of linguistic performance, Directions in Corpus Linguistics。
5.	Simpson, Joy，Rice, Mabel(2004)。Top 10 Things You Should Know about Children with Specific Language Impairment。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	Semantic Relationships in Mandarin Speech Errors
2.	基於中介語語料庫之近義動詞混用情形調查與分析--以「幫」、「幫助」、「幫忙」及「變」、「變得」、「變成」為例
3.	學齡期特定型語言障礙兒童聽知覺區辨能力初探
4.	語言障礙兒童的數學學習障礙與教學初探
5.	Unifying the Long Passive and the Short Passive: On the Bei Construction in Taiwan Mandarin
6.	A Functional Explanation of Taiwan Sign Language Handshape Frequency
7.	Corpus and Grammar: What It Isn't
8.	From Collocation to Event Information: The Case of Mandarin Verbs of Discussion
9.	Verbs of Contact by Impact in English and Their Equivalents in Mandarin Chinese
10.	Sense and Meaning Facets in Verbal Semantics: A MARVS Perspective
11.	Memory Capacity in School-Age Mandarin-Speaking Children with Specific Language Impairment
12.	Alternation Across Semantic Fields: A Study on Mandarin Verbs of Emotion
13.	What Can Near Synonyms Tell Us?
14.	The Module-Attribute Representation of Verbal Semantics: From Semantics to Argument Structure
15.	Towards a Representation of Verbal Semantics--An Approach Based on Near-Synonyms

無相關博士論文

1.	漢語近義詞比較--“本來”和“原來”

無相關著作

1.	Corpus Analysis for Innovative Online English Learning
2.	The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis Revisited: The Prediction of the Strong Version on FLA of Segments
3.	The Results from Two Grammar Methodologies in the Teaching of Restrictive Relative Clauses among Taiwanese Tenth Graders
4.	Teaching Remedial Grammar through Data-Driven Learning Using AntPConc
5.	A Validity Assessment of English-for-Engineers Bridge Course Materials Using Learner Perspectives
6.	Learning to Use Post-nominal Modifiers in English: A Case Study in a University EFL Composition Classroom
7.	Effective Linguistics Learning through a Task Analysis of Authentic Materials
8.	Corpus-Based Approaches to the Teaching of Like
9.	Teaching English Aspect Morphology: Designing Teaching Materials Facilitating Form-Function Mapping
10.	臺灣英語教學領域教師對SSCI現象的看法及隱性學群之探討
11.	Integrating Concordancing into Vocabulary Learning for EFL Primary School Students

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫