:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Against the Deficit in Computational Grammatical Complexity Hypothesis: A Corpus-based Study
書刊名:Concentric: Studies in Linguistics
作者:林怡安
作者(外文):Lin, Yi-An
出版日期:2006
卷期:32:2
頁次:頁59-70
主題關鍵詞:建構語法複雜性的缺陷特定型語言障礙極簡理論Computational grammatical complexity hypothesisCGC hypothesisSpecific language impairmentSLIMinimalist programMP
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:33
運用MacWhinney(1995)研發之「兒童語言資料交換系統」(Child
Language Data Exchange System,簡稱CHILDES)內的Leonard 語料
庫,本研究期望藉由語料的分析,了解以英語為母語的特定型語言障
礙(Specific Language Impairment,簡稱SLI)兒童其句法發展的問題
所在,並檢證van der Lely(2005)宣稱SLI 兒童具有句法異常而提出
的「建構語法複雜性的缺陷」(Deficit in Computational Grammatical
Complexity,簡稱CGC)假設。
本研究的結果顯示Leonard 語料庫中的SLI 兒童,儘管在時態標
記(-ed)、一致標記(-s)和助動詞移位(auxiliary inversion)上經常
犯錯,但在其他句法結構的生成上(例如:格位指定、A 移位、WH
移位)卻顯現沒有問題。依據Chomsky(1998, 1999, 2001, 2005)的
「極簡理論」(Minimalist Program,簡稱MP),本文提出的結論是:
SLI 涉及的是PF 部份裡的問題,而非句法操作上的缺陷。因此,顯示
「建構語法複雜性的缺陷」假設無法與本研究之結論相容。
Based on the Leonard corpus in the Child Language Data Exchange System
(CHILDES), this paper tries to determine the nature of grammatical errors made by
English-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI) and to evaluate a
recent account of SLI, namely van der Lely’s (2005) Deficit in Computational
Grammatical Complexity (CGC) hypothesis, which asserts that SLI can be
characterized by a primary deficit in syntax. However, it is found that the SLI children
in the Leonard corpus correctly perform syntactic operations such as Case assignment,
A-movement and Wh-movement even though they frequently commit errors on tense
marking, agreement marking and auxiliary inversion. Within the framework of
Chomsky’s Minimalist Program (1998, 1999, 2001, 2005), this paper argues that SLI
may involve a PF deficit rather than a syntactic deficit. Therefore, it is shown that the
CGC hypothesis is not compatible with this finding.
期刊論文
1.Clahsen, Harald、Bartke, Susanne、Göllner, Sandra(1997)。Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children。Journal of Neurolinguistics,10,151-171。  new window
2.Eisenbeiss, Sonja、Bartke, Susanne、Clahsen, Harald(2006)。Structural and lexical case in child German: Evidence from language-impaired and typically-developing children。Language Acquisition,13,3-32。  new window
3.Radford, Andrew、Ramos, Eliane(2001)。Case, agreement and EPP: Evidence from an English-speaking child with SLI。Essex Research Reports in Linguistics,36,42-81。  new window
4.Rice, Mabel、Wexler, Ken(1996)。Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children。Journal of Speech and Hearing Research: a Publication of the American Speech and Hearing Association,47,816-834。  new window
5.Van der Lely, H. K. J.(1994)。Canonical linking rules: Forward vs. reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language impaired children。Cognition,51,29-72。  new window
6.Van der Lely, H. K. J.(1998)。SLI in children: Movement, economy and deficits in the computational-syntactic system。Language Acquisition,7,161-192。  new window
7.Van der Lely, H. K. J.(2005)。Grammatical-SLI and the computational grammatical complexity hypothesis。Revue Fréquences,17,13-20。  new window
8.Van der Lely, H. K. J.、Battell, Jackie(2003)。Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis。Language,79,153-181。  new window
9.Van der Lely, H. K. J.、Stollwerck, Linda(1997)。Binding theory and specifically language impaired children。Cognition,52,245-290。  new window
圖書
1.Chomsky, N.(1999)。Derivation by phase。Ken Hale: A Life in Language。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Adger, David(2003)。Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Radford, Andrew、Atkinson, Martin、Britain, David、Clahsen, Harald、Spencer, Andrew(1999)。Linguistics: An Introduction。Cambridge, UK。  new window
4.Chomsky, Noam(2005)。On Phases。Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
5.MacWhinney, Brian(1995)。The CHILDES project: Computational tools for analyzing talk。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Radford, Andrew(2004)。Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Chomsky, Noam(1995)。The minimalist program。MIT Press。  new window
8.Radford, Andrew(2005)。English Syntax Revisited: An Introduction。English Syntax Revisited: An Introduction。  new window
9.Rizzi, Luigi(1996)。Residual verb second and the WH-criterion。Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax。Oxford。  new window
單篇論文
1.Chomsky, Noam(2001)。Beyond Explanatory Adequacy,MIT。  new window
圖書論文
1.Pesetsky, David、Torrego, Esther(2001)。T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences。Ken Hale: A Life in Language。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Chomsky, Noam(2000)。Minimalist inquiries: the framework。Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik。MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top