資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.225.72.133)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Catastrophe, Contagion, and Aphanisis: The Homeopathic/Fatal Strategies of the Postmodern Subject
書刊名:
NTU Studies in Language and Literature
作者:
周俊男
作者(外文):
Chou, Jun-nan
出版日期:
2007
卷期:
17
頁次:
頁43-78
主題關鍵詞:
災難
;
感染
;
消散
;
順勢療法
;
後現代
;
主體
;
Homeopathic
;
Postmodern
;
Catastrophe
;
Contagion
;
Aphanisis
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:83
本文嘗試由詹明信所提的「順勢療法」來解讀不同的後現代理論,並用「內在批判」的觀點將這些理論加以串連。對後現代主體所進行的「同位療法」或「內在批判」的精髓在於齊傑克所謂的「二次犧牲」或波西亞所謂的「二次死亡」。後現代主體的內在矛盾是主體必先以解構自己的方式來表現自己。但這種解構網網導向「多元論」或「遊牧式主體」,喪失主體安身立命的立足點,而陷入種種理論或實際政治操作上的困難。「多元論」或「遊牧式主體」偏向於「革命」或「超越」的理論取向,在超越「他者」的同時,終究不自覺地陷入「他者」所建立的標準或價值觀上。主體要達到真正的自由或超脫,不僅要革「他者」的命,也要革「自己」的命。這種革「自己」的命的舉動就是詹明信所謂的「同位療法」,以毒攻毒。後現代主體必須先拆解自身,才能悠遊於「去畛域化」或「虛擬化」的後現代社會;解構必須以後現代主體的「背反性」(內在分裂)為基礎才能竟其功。一直以來,波希亞、德勒茲、或拉岡等人的理論常被解讀為「解構主義」的同路人。本文嘗試由後現代主體的「自宮策略」來重新解讀他們三人的理論,並從這個新解中,為後現代主體找尋新的出路。本文認為波希亞所提出的「災難」,德勒茲所提出的「感染」,拉岡所提出的「消散」是後現代主體「自宮策略」的不同表現方式,都能點出後現代主體的「內在超越」策略。
以文找文
The concern of this paper is to give some postmodernist theories which share in an “immanent critique” of the postmodern subject, a critique informed by what Žižek calls “sacrifice of sacrifice” or what Baudrillard calls “death against death.” The constitutive contradiction of postmodern subjectivity is that, to manifest itself, it first has to efface itself: not only does the postmodern subject have to sacritice its traditional imaginary or symbolic mandates or roles, but it also has to sacrifice the act of sacrifice itself. As Žižek puts it, “the subject must‘disappear,’ die, yet his sacrifice will not become a myth.” This redefines the parameters of identification. To sacrifice the sacrifice, to fight death with death, is what Jameson calls the “homeopathic” critique of the (post) modern subject and, as Baudrillard calls it, a “fatal strategy.” This approach requires the (post) modern subject to decenter and deterritorize itself in a radical way to survive the postmodern world of hyperreality, simulations, or deterritorization. But the fatal strategies of the subject should not be mistaken for postmodern pluralism or politics of difference; rather, the fatal strategy should be taken as what Lacan calls “the second death” by which the (death) drive, thanks to the transformation of the human form of identification, can manifest itself in the mode of the Deleuzian flux of desire or body without organs. Based on a re-reading of Baudrillard, Deleuze, and Lacan, who have long been aligned with poststructuralism, this paper will remap the postmodern subject through the homeopathic critique of poststructuralism provided by the three theorists. Baudrillard entices the postmodern subject to follow the fatal strategies of the object by which the postmodern subject can turn itself into a catatrophic subject adn fight catastrophe with catastrophe. Deleuze calls for the postmodern subject to create multiplicity or inner variation, an act which Deleuze calls “contagion.” Lacan appeals to aphanisis or subjective destitution of the postmodern subject, to its “second death” by which the subject can be “separated” from the Other and turn alienation (from the Other) into a death drive (of the subject).
以文找文
Other
1.
Jameson, Fredric(1983)。Postmodernism and Consumer Society,Port Toensend, MA。
期刊論文
1.
Tofoletti, Kim(2004)。Catastrophic Subjects: Feminism, the Posthuman, and Difference。Thirdspace,3(2)。
2.
Acker, Kathy(1989)。A Few Notes on Two of My Two Books。The Review of Contemporary Fiction,9(3),31-36。
圖書
1.
Dallos, Sally、Dallos, Radi(1997)。Couples, Sex, and Power: the Politics of Desire。Buckingham:Open University Press。
2.
Badiou, Alain(2000)。Deleuze: The Clamor of Being。Deleuze: The Clamor of Being。Minneapolis。
3.
Lacan, Jacques、Fink, Bruce(1998)。On feminine sexuality, the limits of love and knowledge, 1972-1973: Encore。New York:W. W. Norton。
4.
Lacan, Jacques、Miller, Jacques-Alain、Porter, Dennis(1986)。The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。
5.
Nasio, Juan-David(1998)。Five Lessons on the Psychoanalytic Theory of Jacques Lacan。Albany:New York:State University of New York Press。
6.
Acker, Kathy(1984)。Blood and Guts in High School。New York:Grove Press, Inc.。
7.
Acker, Kathy(1988)。Empire of the Senseless。New York:Grove Press, Inc.。
8.
Acker, Kathy(1996)。Pussy, King of the Pirates。New York:Grove Press, Inc.。
9.
Žižek, Slavoj(2004)。Organs without Bodies: Deleuze and Consequences。New York, NY:Routledge。
10.
Baudrillard, Jean、Glaser, Sheila Faria(1994)。Simulacra and Simulation。Michigan。
11.
Deleuze, Gilles、Guattari, Félix、Massumi, Brian(1988)。A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia。Inneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。
12.
Jameson, Fredric(1991)。Postmodernism, Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism。Durham, North Carolina:Duke University Press。
13.
Žižek, Slavoj(1999)。The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology。Verso。
14.
Baudrillard, Jean(1998)。The Consumer Society--Myths & Structures。London:Sage Publications。
15.
Lacan, Jacques、Sheridan, Alan、Miller, Jacques-Alain(1978)。The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis。New York:W.W. Norton & Company。
16.
Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian、Jameson, Fredric(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester:Manchester University Press。
17.
Young, Iris Marion(1990)。Justice and Politics of Difference。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。
18.
Bertens, Hans(1995)。The Idea of the Postmodern: A History。Routledge。
19.
Žižek, Slavoj(1992)。Enjoy Your Symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out。London:Routledge。
20.
Jameson, Fredric(1981)。The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。
21.
Žižek, Slavoj(1989)。The Sublime Object of Ideology。London:Verso。
22.
Copjec, Joan(1994)。Read My Desire: Lacan against the Historicists。MIT Press。
23.
Hardt, Michael、Negri, Antonio(2004)。Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire。Penguin。
24.
Kelnner, Douglas(1989)。Jameson, Marxism, and Postmodernism。Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique。Washington, D. C.。
25.
Baudrillard, Jean(2002)。The Spirit of Terroism。The Spirit of Terroism。London。
26.
Dolar, Mladen、Zizek, Slavoj(2002)。Machine and Enjoyment。Opera’s Second Death。New York。
27.
Stephanson, Anders(1988)。Regarding Postmodernism-A conversation with Fredric Jameson。Universal Abandon?: The Politics of Postmodernism。Minneapolis。
28.
Stephanson, Anders(1989)。Regarding Postmodernism-A conversation with Fredric Jameson。Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique。Washington。
29.
Zizek, Slavoj(1999)。The Fantasy in Cyberspace。The Zizek Reader。Oxford。
30.
Strauss, Richard(1986)。Don Quixote。Don Quixote。New York。
31.
Baudrillard, Jean(1983)。The Ecstacy of Communication。The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Cultrure。Port Townsend。
32.
Baudrillard, Jean(1988)。Symbolic Exchange and Death。Jean Baudrillard Selected Writings。London。
33.
Baudrillard, Jean(1988)。Fatal Strategies。Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings。Cambridge。
34.
Baudrillard, Jean(1993)。Towards a Principle of Evil。Postmodernism: A Reader。New York。
35.
Best, Steven(1989)。Jameson, Totality, and the Poststructuralist Critique。Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique。Washington。
其他
1.
Baudrillard, Jean(2001)。The Spirit of Terrorism。
圖書論文
1.
Deleuze, Gilles(2000)。The Body, the Meat and the Spirit: Becoming Animal。The Artist's Body。London:Phaidon Press。
2.
Kipnis, Laura(1988)。Feminism: The Political Conscience of Postmodernism?。Universal Abandon?: the Politics of Postmodernism。Minneapolis, Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press。
3.
Wouters, Cas(1999)。Balancing Sex and Love since the 1960s Sexual Revolution。Love and eroticism。London:Sage。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
全球情境,荒人觀點
2.
謊言實錄:楊德昌「恐怖份子」的性、謊言、暴力
3.
Subjectivity and History in Don DeLillo's Libra
4.
人類主體神話的「解構」或「超越」?--試析平路《人工智慧紀事》
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code