:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Catastrophe, Contagion, and Aphanisis: The Homeopathic/Fatal Strategies of the Postmodern Subject
書刊名:NTU Studies in Language and Literature
作者:周俊男 引用關係
作者(外文):Chou, Jun-nan
出版日期:2007
卷期:17
頁次:頁43-78
主題關鍵詞:災難感染消散順勢療法後現代主體HomeopathicPostmodernCatastropheContagionAphanisis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:83
本文嘗試由詹明信所提的「順勢療法」來解讀不同的後現代理論,並用「內在批判」的觀點將這些理論加以串連。對後現代主體所進行的「同位療法」或「內在批判」的精髓在於齊傑克所謂的「二次犧牲」或波西亞所謂的「二次死亡」。後現代主體的內在矛盾是主體必先以解構自己的方式來表現自己。但這種解構網網導向「多元論」或「遊牧式主體」,喪失主體安身立命的立足點,而陷入種種理論或實際政治操作上的困難。「多元論」或「遊牧式主體」偏向於「革命」或「超越」的理論取向,在超越「他者」的同時,終究不自覺地陷入「他者」所建立的標準或價值觀上。主體要達到真正的自由或超脫,不僅要革「他者」的命,也要革「自己」的命。這種革「自己」的命的舉動就是詹明信所謂的「同位療法」,以毒攻毒。後現代主體必須先拆解自身,才能悠遊於「去畛域化」或「虛擬化」的後現代社會;解構必須以後現代主體的「背反性」(內在分裂)為基礎才能竟其功。一直以來,波希亞、德勒茲、或拉岡等人的理論常被解讀為「解構主義」的同路人。本文嘗試由後現代主體的「自宮策略」來重新解讀他們三人的理論,並從這個新解中,為後現代主體找尋新的出路。本文認為波希亞所提出的「災難」,德勒茲所提出的「感染」,拉岡所提出的「消散」是後現代主體「自宮策略」的不同表現方式,都能點出後現代主體的「內在超越」策略。
The concern of this paper is to give some postmodernist theories which share in an “immanent critique” of the postmodern subject, a critique informed by what Žižek calls “sacrifice of sacrifice” or what Baudrillard calls “death against death.” The constitutive contradiction of postmodern subjectivity is that, to manifest itself, it first has to efface itself: not only does the postmodern subject have to sacritice its traditional imaginary or symbolic mandates or roles, but it also has to sacrifice the act of sacrifice itself. As Žižek puts it, “the subject must‘disappear,’ die, yet his sacrifice will not become a myth.” This redefines the parameters of identification. To sacrifice the sacrifice, to fight death with death, is what Jameson calls the “homeopathic” critique of the (post) modern subject and, as Baudrillard calls it, a “fatal strategy.” This approach requires the (post) modern subject to decenter and deterritorize itself in a radical way to survive the postmodern world of hyperreality, simulations, or deterritorization. But the fatal strategies of the subject should not be mistaken for postmodern pluralism or politics of difference; rather, the fatal strategy should be taken as what Lacan calls “the second death” by which the (death) drive, thanks to the transformation of the human form of identification, can manifest itself in the mode of the Deleuzian flux of desire or body without organs. Based on a re-reading of Baudrillard, Deleuze, and Lacan, who have long been aligned with poststructuralism, this paper will remap the postmodern subject through the homeopathic critique of poststructuralism provided by the three theorists. Baudrillard entices the postmodern subject to follow the fatal strategies of the object by which the postmodern subject can turn itself into a catatrophic subject adn fight catastrophe with catastrophe. Deleuze calls for the postmodern subject to create multiplicity or inner variation, an act which Deleuze calls “contagion.” Lacan appeals to aphanisis or subjective destitution of the postmodern subject, to its “second death” by which the subject can be “separated” from the Other and turn alienation (from the Other) into a death drive (of the subject).
Other
1.Jameson, Fredric(1983)。Postmodernism and Consumer Society,Port Toensend, MA。  new window
期刊論文
1.Tofoletti, Kim(2004)。Catastrophic Subjects: Feminism, the Posthuman, and Difference。Thirdspace,3(2)。  new window
2.Acker, Kathy(1989)。A Few Notes on Two of My Two Books。The Review of Contemporary Fiction,9(3),31-36。  new window
圖書
1.Dallos, Sally、Dallos, Radi(1997)。Couples, Sex, and Power: the Politics of Desire。Buckingham:Open University Press。  new window
2.Badiou, Alain(2000)。Deleuze: The Clamor of Being。Deleuze: The Clamor of Being。Minneapolis。  new window
3.Lacan, Jacques、Fink, Bruce(1998)。On feminine sexuality, the limits of love and knowledge, 1972-1973: Encore。New York:W. W. Norton。  new window
4.Lacan, Jacques、Miller, Jacques-Alain、Porter, Dennis(1986)。The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
5.Nasio, Juan-David(1998)。Five Lessons on the Psychoanalytic Theory of Jacques Lacan。Albany:New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
6.Acker, Kathy(1984)。Blood and Guts in High School。New York:Grove Press, Inc.。  new window
7.Acker, Kathy(1988)。Empire of the Senseless。New York:Grove Press, Inc.。  new window
8.Acker, Kathy(1996)。Pussy, King of the Pirates。New York:Grove Press, Inc.。  new window
9.Žižek, Slavoj(2004)。Organs without Bodies: Deleuze and Consequences。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
10.Baudrillard, Jean、Glaser, Sheila Faria(1994)。Simulacra and Simulation。Michigan。  new window
11.Deleuze, Gilles、Guattari, Félix、Massumi, Brian(1988)。A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia。Inneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
12.Jameson, Fredric(1991)。Postmodernism, Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism。Durham, North Carolina:Duke University Press。  new window
13.Žižek, Slavoj(1999)。The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology。Verso。  new window
14.Baudrillard, Jean(1998)。The Consumer Society--Myths & Structures。London:Sage Publications。  new window
15.Lacan, Jacques、Sheridan, Alan、Miller, Jacques-Alain(1978)。The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis。New York:W.W. Norton & Company。  new window
16.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian、Jameson, Fredric(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
17.Young, Iris Marion(1990)。Justice and Politics of Difference。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
18.Bertens, Hans(1995)。The Idea of the Postmodern: A History。Routledge。  new window
19.Žižek, Slavoj(1992)。Enjoy Your Symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out。London:Routledge。  new window
20.Jameson, Fredric(1981)。The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
21.Žižek, Slavoj(1989)。The Sublime Object of Ideology。London:Verso。  new window
22.Copjec, Joan(1994)。Read My Desire: Lacan against the Historicists。MIT Press。  new window
23.Hardt, Michael、Negri, Antonio(2004)。Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire。Penguin。  new window
24.Kelnner, Douglas(1989)。Jameson, Marxism, and Postmodernism。Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique。Washington, D. C.。  new window
25.Baudrillard, Jean(2002)。The Spirit of Terroism。The Spirit of Terroism。London。  new window
26.Dolar, Mladen、Zizek, Slavoj(2002)。Machine and Enjoyment。Opera’s Second Death。New York。  new window
27.Stephanson, Anders(1988)。Regarding Postmodernism-A conversation with Fredric Jameson。Universal Abandon?: The Politics of Postmodernism。Minneapolis。  new window
28.Stephanson, Anders(1989)。Regarding Postmodernism-A conversation with Fredric Jameson。Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique。Washington。  new window
29.Zizek, Slavoj(1999)。The Fantasy in Cyberspace。The Zizek Reader。Oxford。  new window
30.Strauss, Richard(1986)。Don Quixote。Don Quixote。New York。  new window
31.Baudrillard, Jean(1983)。The Ecstacy of Communication。The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Cultrure。Port Townsend。  new window
32.Baudrillard, Jean(1988)。Symbolic Exchange and Death。Jean Baudrillard Selected Writings。London。  new window
33.Baudrillard, Jean(1988)。Fatal Strategies。Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings。Cambridge。  new window
34.Baudrillard, Jean(1993)。Towards a Principle of Evil。Postmodernism: A Reader。New York。  new window
35.Best, Steven(1989)。Jameson, Totality, and the Poststructuralist Critique。Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique。Washington。  new window
其他
1.Baudrillard, Jean(2001)。The Spirit of Terrorism。  new window
圖書論文
1.Deleuze, Gilles(2000)。The Body, the Meat and the Spirit: Becoming Animal。The Artist's Body。London:Phaidon Press。  new window
2.Kipnis, Laura(1988)。Feminism: The Political Conscience of Postmodernism?。Universal Abandon?: the Politics of Postmodernism。Minneapolis, Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
3.Wouters, Cas(1999)。Balancing Sex and Love since the 1960s Sexual Revolution。Love and eroticism。London:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE