From the Ming dynasty to the present, scholars held different views on the meaning of the sentence “Range upon range of small hills with glittering shine” in the first one of Wen Ting-yun’s “Fourteen Pusaman Ci Poems”. Their opinions can be generally categorized into four streams: “screen hill”, “forehead and eyebrow”, “pillow hill”, and “hair accessories”. Despite this kind of grouping, every stream still has its various explanations. The author thinks that this chaotic situation emerged mainly because in the past many scholars explored this problem only from their own perspectives and did not consider their previous ones’ ideas seriously. Although a small number of scholars tried to make a critical review of these various schools of comments, their efforts came to nothing for different reasons. This paper examines the problem from a new perspective based on the author’s fundamental understandings of Wen Ting-yun’s works, logical principles and syntactic analysis.