:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Linking Data to Grammar in Phonology: Two Case Studies
書刊名:Concentric: Studies in Linguistics
作者:麥傑
作者(外文):Myers, James
出版日期:2007
卷期:33:2
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:音韻學心理學量化語言學巴宰語臺灣手語PhonologyPsychologyQuantitative linguisticsPazihTaiwan sign language
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:63
語言學家長久以來一直對心理學應該在語言學理論中起什麼作用
有所爭議。本文無意介入形式學派和功能學派的傳統論戰。但本文倡
導採用心理學的方法,而不一定其概念,來檢測語言學論斷。這即是
說,透過量化的分析,發展詳盡的模型,來聯結假設的心智本質和所
觀察的語料。我們採用這種較懷疑的態度來分析兩個音韻學議題:其
一為南島語系的巴宰語之增音和母音調和,其二為台灣手語和美國手
語之手形類型比較。在這兩個個案研究中,聯結模型的方法對某些頗
具共識而未被質疑的結論提出了挑戰,卻也同時強化了另外一些結論
的可信度。
Linguists have long debated the proper role of psychology in grammatical
theorizing. Rather than taking the traditional formalist or functionalist positions in this
debate, this paper instead advocates testing grammatical claims using the methods, but
not necessarily the concepts, of psychology. This means developing explicit models of
the links between hypothesized mental entities and observed data, often with the use of
quantitative analysis. This more skeptical approach is applied in analyses of two
phonological issues: epenthesis and vowel harmony in the Formosan language Pazih,
and a comparison between the handshape inventories of Taiwan Sign Language and
American Sign Language. In both case studies, the linking model approach undermines
certain conclusions that might otherwise have been accepted uncritically, but at the
same time it strengthens our confidence in others.
期刊論文
1.Blust, Robert A.(1999)。Notes on Pazeh phonology and morphology。Oceanic Linguistics,38(2),321-365。  new window
2.張榮興、蘇秀芬、戴浩一(20050400)。Classifier Predicates Reanalyzed, with Special Reference to Taiwan Sign Language。語言暨語言學,6(2),247-278。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Sperling, G.(1960)。The information available in brief visual presentations。Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,74(11),1-29。  new window
4.Duanmu, San(2002)。Two theories of onset clusters。Chinese Phonology,11,97-120。new window  new window
5.Ann, Jean(1996)。On the relation between the difficulty and the frequency of occurrence of handshapes in two sign languages。Lingua,98,19-41。  new window
6.Ann, Jean(2005)。A functional explanation of Taiwan Sign Language handshape frequency。語言暨語言學,62,:217-245。new window  new window
7.Anttila, Arto(2002)。Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,20,1-42。  new window
8.Ohala, John J.(1986)。Consumer's guide to evidence in phonology。Phonology Yearbook,3,3-26。  new window
9.Reiss, C.(2003)。Quantification in structural descriptions: Attested and unattested patterns。The Linguistic Review,20,305-338。  new window
學位論文
1.李信賢(2003)。Analyzing Handshape Changes in Taiwan Sign Language,Chiayi。  new window
2.Ann, Jean(1993)。A Linguistic Investigation of Physiology and Handshape,Tuscon。  new window
圖書
1.Archangeli, Diana、Pulleyblank, Douglas G.(1994)。Grounded Phonology。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press。  new window
2.Bloomfield, Leonard(1933)。Language。Harper & Row。  new window
3.Smith, Wayne H.、Ting, Li-Fen(1979)。Shou Neng Sheng Qiao。Taipei。  new window
4.Jackson, Russell、Small, Ian(1983)。Introduction。Amsterdam。  new window
5.Smith, Wayne H.、Ting, Li-Fen(1984)。Shou Neng Sheng Qiao。Shou Neng Sheng Qiao。Taipei。  new window
6.Chomsky, Noam、Halle, Morris(1990)。The Sound Pattern of English。The Sound Pattern of English。Cambridge, MA。  new window
7.Li, Paul Jen-kuei、Tsuchida, Shigeru(2001)。Pazih Dictionary。Taipei:Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica。  new window
8.Sandler, Wendy、Lillo-Martin, Diane(2006)。Sign Language and Linguistic Universals。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.McCarthy, John J.(2002)。A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Chomsly, Noam(1980)。Rules and representations。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
11.Blevins, Juliette(2004)。Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Chomsky, Noam(1965)。Aspects of the Theory of Syntax。MIT Press。  new window
13.Ann, Jean(2006)。Frequency of Occurrence and Ease of Articulation of Sign Language Handshapes: The Taiwanese Example。Frequency of Occurrence and Ease of Articulation of Sign Language Handshapes: The Taiwanese Example。Washington, DC。  new window
14.Bloomfield, Leonard(1983)。An Introduction to the Study of Language。An Introduction to the Study of Language。Amsterdam。  new window
15.Chomsky, Noam(1971)。Problems of Knowledge and Freedom。Problems of Knowledge and Freedom。New York。  new window
16.Marcus, G. F.(2001)。The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science。Cambridge, MA.:MIT Press。  new window
17.Myers, J.。Generative morphology as psycholinguistics。The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives。Amsterdam。  new window
18.Sternberg, M. L. A.(1998)。American Sign Language。American Sign Language。New York。  new window
19.Sternberg, S.(1998)。Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors。An Invitation to Cognitive Science (Vol. 4) Methods, Models, and Conceptual Issues。Cambridge, MA.。  new window
20.Tennant, R. A.、Brown, M. G.(1998)。The American Sign Language Handshape Dictionary。The American Sign Language Handshape Dictionary。Washington, DC。  new window
21.Derwing, Bruce L.、Baker, W. J.(1978)。On the Re-integration of Linguistics and Psychology。Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language。New York。  new window
其他
1.Corina, D.,Sagey, Elizabeth(1988)。Predictability in ASL handshapes with implications,San Diego。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE