資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.216.11.163)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
The Friar's Tale and Divine Justice: The Reality and the Fiction of Righteous Anger
書刊名:
NTU Studies in Language and Literature
作者:
葛瑞斐
作者(外文):
Griffith, John Lance
出版日期:
2007
卷期:
18
頁次:
頁37-59
主題關鍵詞:
喬叟
;
坎特貝里故事
;
化緣修士的故事
;
模範敘事
;
憤怒
;
激情史
;
Chaucer
;
Canterbury tales
;
Friar's tale
;
Exemplary narrative
;
Anger
;
History of the passions
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:47
化緣修士的故事是架構在坎特貝里朝聖及朝聖者同伴關係的背景上,其故事及結果為我們提供了一個模式,即:在喬叟敘事中,地獄與天神憤怒的邏輯,在人世中是如何發揮作用—或甚至在大體上如何失去了作用。對於喬叟來說,在區分究竟是為神的正義還是為復仇私利而行事的這件議題上,要比對但丁來的更加棘手。我認為喬叟在化緣修士的故事中重探此一議題,並在此巧妙地評論但丁於《地獄》一書中對憤怒的處理。為了挑戰湯馬斯正義之怒的觀念,並且展現人類(例如化緣修士及但丁)的激情盛怒是如何與其理性憤怒和神的正義等二者抽象理念糾結,喬叟刻意模糊了人類實現願望,神的正義,及理想忍耐等三種敘事形式之間的界線。這提醒了我們,喬叟之所以對於地獄、正義、及神怒等敘事方式所衍生之問題產生興趣,並非全在於他對敘述結構學、詩學、或神學之間所產生的某種抽象理論而感到興趣,而是由於喬叟對於憤怒,在道德層面上,對個人和社會的關係所產生的影響有興趣。喬叟的矛盾,突顯了蘊含於中世紀晚期哲學與神學中,令人又愛又恨的人類憤怒特質所引發的焦慮。而這樣矛盾的特質,更成為文藝復興初期作家的一個主要研究課題,也使喬叟作品成為聯繫文藝復興以及中世紀晚期文學風格的橋樑。
以文找文
Set within the context of the Canterbury pilgrimage and the pilgrim fellowship, the Friar’s tale and its aftermath provide us with a model of how, in Chaucer’s narratives, the logic of hell and divine anger work—or largely fail to work—when applied in the human world. More so than for Dante, identifying the line between serving divine justice and serving vengeful self-interest is problematic for Chaucer. This is a problem that, I argue, we find Chaucer revisiting in the Friar’s tale. Subtly commenting on Dante’s treatment of anger in the Inferno, Chaucer intentionally blurs the line between narratives of human wish-fulfillment, narratives of divine justice, and narratives of ideal patience in order to challenge the Thomist concept of just anger and expose the way in which the human passions of individuals like the Friar (and Dante) become entangled in their narratives of abstract ideals such as rational anger and divine justice. We are reminded that Chaucer’s interest in the problems generated by narratives of hell, justice, and divine anger stems not solely from some abstract interest in narratology or poetics or theology, but from an ethical interest in the impact anger has on the individual and on social relations. Chaucer’s ambivalence underscores for us the anxiety in late medieval philosophy and theology raised by that quality of human anger which made it at once attractive and repulsive, and which would make it a principle subject for the writers of the emerging Renaissance: an age to which Chaucer’s writings serve as a bridge from the late medieval world.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Tupper, F.(1915)。The Quarrels of the Canterbury Pilgrims。Journal of English and Germanic Philology,14(2),256-270。
2.
Bloomfield, Morton(1983)。The Friar's Tale as a Liminal Tale。Chaucer Review,17,286-291。
3.
Clark, S. L.、Wasserman, Julian N.(1978)。Echoes of Leviathan and the Harrowing of Hell in Chaucer's Man of Lawfs Tale。South Central Bulletin,38,140-142。
4.
Godrey, Mary F.(1998)。Only Words: Cursing and Authority of Language in Chaucer's Friar's Tale。Exemplaria,10,307-328。
5.
Hahn, Thomas(1983)。Text and Context: Chaucer's Friar's Tale。Studies in the Age of Chaucer: The Yearbook of the New Chaucer Society,5,67-101。
6.
Kline, Daniel T.(1998)。Myne by Right: Oath Making and Intent in The Friar's Tale。Philological Quarterly,77,271-293。
7.
Kolve, V. A.(1990)。"Man in the Middle": Art and Religion in Chaucer's Friar's Tale。Studies in the Age of Chaucer,12,5-46。
8.
Leicester, H. Marshall Jr.(1982)。No vileyns word: Social Context and Performance in Chaucer's Friar's Tale。Chaucer Review,17(1),21-39。
9.
Lenaghan, R. T.(1973)。The Irony of the Friar's Tale。Chaucer Review,7,281-294。
10.
Pace, George B.(1963)。Adam's Hell。PMLA,78(1),25-35。
11.
Richardson, Janette(1975)。Friar and Summoner: The Art of Balance。Chaucer Review,9,227-236。
12.
Shaw, Judith(1984)。Wrath in the Canterbury Pilgrims。English Language Notes,21(3),7-10。
13.
Simmons-O'Neill, Elizabeth(1990)。Love in Hell: The Role of Pluto and Proserpine in Chaucer's Merchants Tale。Modern Language Quarterly,51,389-407。
14.
Spencer, Theodore(1927)。Chaucer's Hell: A Study in Mediaeval Convention。Speculum,2(2),177-200。
圖書
1.
Cesar of Heisterbach、Strange, Joseph(1851)。Caesarii Heisterbacensis monachi or dinis Cisterciensis Dialogus Miraculorum。Cologne:H. Lempertz。
2.
Chaucer, Geoffrey、Benson, Larry D.(1987)。The Riverside Chaucer。Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin。
3.
Fein, Susanna Greer、Raybin, David、Braeger, Peter C.(1991)。Rebels and Rivals: The Contestive Spirit in The Canterbury Tales。Kalamazoo:Medieval Institute Publications。
4.
Aquinas(1967)。Summa Theologiae。McGraw Hill。
5.
Munro, Dana Carleton(1901)。Medieval Sermon-Stories: Revised Edition of Monastic Tales of the XIII Century。Philadelphia:Dept. of History of the U of Pennsylvania。
6.
Boyde, Patrick(2000)。Human Vices and Human Worth in Dante's Comedy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
7.
Bryan, W. F.、Dempster, Germaine(1958)。Sources and Analogues of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales。Highlands, NJ:Atlantic Humanities。
8.
Cassell, Anthony K.(1984)。Dante's Fearful Art of Justice。Toronto:U of Toronto P。
9.
Howard, Donald(1976)。The Idea of the Canterbury Tales。Berkeley:University of California Press。
10.
Huppe, Bernard F.(1964)。A Reading of the Canterbury Tales。Baltimore:Garamond/Pridemark。
11.
Knapp, Peggy Ann(1990)。Chaucer and the Social Contest。New York:Routledge。
12.
Lindahl, Carl(1987)。Earnest Games: Folkloric Patterns in the Canterbury Tales。Bloomington:Indiana UP。
13.
Lynch, Kathryn L.(2000)。Chaucer's Philosophical Visions。Rochester, NY:D. S. Brewer。
14.
Mazzota, Giuseppe(1993)。Dante's Vision and the Circle of Knowledge。Princeton:Princeton UP。
15.
Newman, Barbara(1995)。From Virile Woman to Woman Christ: Studies in Medieval Religion and Literature。Philadelphia:U of Pennsylvania P。
16.
Olson, Paul A.(1986)。The Canterbury Tales and the Good Society。Princeton, N.J.:Princeton UP。
17.
Owst, G. R.(1933)。Literature and Pulpit in Medieval England。Cambridge:Cambridge UP。
18.
Owst, G. R.(1926)。Preaching in Medieval England。Cambridge UP。
19.
Rosenwein, Barbara H.(1998)。Anger's Past: The Social Uses of an Emotion in the Middle Ages。Cornell University Press。
20.
Aristotle、Irwin, Terence(1985)。Nicomachean Ethics。Hackett Publishing Company。
圖書論文
1.
Mann, Jill(1990)。Anger and Glosynge in the Canterbury Tales。Proceedings of the British Academy。
2.
Ridley, Florence H.(1992)。The Friar and the Critics。The Idea of Medieval Literature: New Essays on Chaucer and Medieval Culture in Honor of Donald R. Howard。Newark:University of Delaware Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
Good Anger and the Benefits of Dis-ease: Critical Images of the Body in "The Parson's Tale"
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
西歐中世紀盛期聖婦的身體觀與身份認同
2.
Troy in the Troilus and Criseyde
3.
洞庭古祠考--中古湘水下游的祠廟景觀
4.
Generic Implications of Chaucer's Wife of Bath's Tale
5.
晚期中古英文寫作與文化記憶/繼譯
6.
Making the Medieval Less Foreign: Expanding Worldviews in Taiwan Classrooms
7.
從風骨到柔婉、餘韻的重視--清代以前對中古詩歌批評的一個轉向
8.
古早地方話英文文學的自我意識
9.
Female Voice in Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales
10.
A Fledging Field: Medieval European Studies in Taiwan, 1980-2000
11.
騎士精神裡「喪盡天良的醜行」: 喬瑟的〈律師的故事〉
12.
從「情史」看馮夢龍「發乎情」的文學觀
13.
英國中世紀文學中的想像力理論與實踐
14.
尋找中世紀羅賓漢歌謠裡的他性與異質空間
15.
抹大拿的瑪利亞與她的聖人姊妹們:中世紀東安格利亞對於抹大拿的瑪利亞的崇敬與其女聖人社群
QR Code