:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同競爭情境對國小學童排球低手學習表現的影響
書刊名:運動與遊憩研究
作者:蘇秦玉 引用關係葉慶年
作者(外文):Su, Chin-yuYeh, Chinq-nian
出版日期:2007
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁193-204
主題關鍵詞:團體競爭個人競爭自我競爭學習表現Team competition groupIndividual competition groupSelf competition groupLearning performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:16
本研究目的旨在探討不同競爭情境對國小學童排球低手學習表現的影響。受試者爲南投縣竹山國小的學生112名(男生56,女生56),並將受試者隨機平均分配爲團體競爭組、個人競爭組、自我競爭組與控制組。實驗項目爲排球低手向上擊球。經過六週的實驗練習後,所得結果爲:一、團體競爭組、個人競爭組及自我競爭組之前測、後測成績有顯著差異。二、自我競爭組之學習進步成績有顯著性差異,自我競爭組之學習效果明顯優於控制組之學習效果。三、團體競爭組、個人競爭組及自我競爭組之前測、保留效果成績有顯著差異。四、自我競爭組保留效果之進步成績有顯著性差異,自我競爭組之學習保留效果明顯優於控制組之學習保留效果。研究者針對研究結果提出有關結果的應用及未來研究的建議。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of different competitive situations on elementary school students learning volleyball underhand skills. The subjects are 112 students (56 boys, 56 girls) from Jhushan Elementary School, Nantou County. They are assigned averagely and randomly and randomly into team competition group, individual competition group, self competition group and control group. The experiment item is to hit the volleyball. After six-week experimental practice, the results are as follows: 1. pre-tests and post-tests have distinctive differences in the groups of team competion, individual competition and self competition. 2. Getting better grades is distinctive in self competition group., the learning effects of self competition group is obviously better than that of the control group. 3. The pre-tests and the grades that retain are distinctive in team competition group, individual competition group and self competition group. 4. Making progess in grades that retain is distinctive in self competition group, the effect of learning retention in self competition group is better than that in control group. According to the research results, researchers propose result-related applications and suggestions for future studies.
期刊論文
1.Ames, C.(1984)。Achievement attributions and self-instruction in competitive and individualistic goal structures。Journal of Educational Psychology,73,478-487。  new window
2.Nicholls, J. G.(1979)。The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of own attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability。Child Development,49,800-814。  new window
3.Martens, R.(1975)。The paradigmatic crisis an American sport personology。Sportwissenschaft,5,9-24。  new window
4.Weinberg, R. S.、Jackson, A. J.(1988)。The effects of mastery, competitive, and cooperative goal on the performance of simple and complex basketball skills。Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,10,408-417。  new window
5.Locke, E. A.、Shaw, K. N.、Saari, L. M.、Latham, G. P.(1981)。Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980。Psychological Bulletin,90(1),125-152。  new window
學位論文
1.陳偉瑀(2001)。競爭情境及回饋方式對高、低自我設限學生在運動練習行為、運動表現及歸因的影響(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蘇秦玉(1999)。目標難度、獎賞方式及競爭對保齡球運動表現及內在動機的影響。臺北:虹舟出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, F. P.(1975)。Group theory and group skill。NJ:Pentice-Hall。  new window
3.黃金柱(1985)。體育社會心理學。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.盧俊宏(1994)。運動心理學。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kelley, H. H.、Thibaut, J. W.(1969)。Group problem solving。The handbook of social psychology。Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top