玄奘 (600-664) 三藏法師的舍利真偽問題，前幾年在大陸曾引發一場爭議，主要爭議的焦點在於唐宋黃巢之亂時，是否有「黃巢發塔」而導致玄吳三藏法師的遺骸遷葬到終南山紫閣寺，雙方各說各話，未有交集。無論主張舍利是真或偽，均屬推測，無法提出讓對方信服的證據。 本文以2003年戶縣人民政府召開「玄奘大師與紫閣寺學術論證會」，以及興教寺召開「黃巢發塔真偽辨學術討論會」，雙方所發表的意見為線索，對正反面意見提出剖析，可方便後續研究者。

The authenticity of Hsuan Chuang’s (600-604) bone stones from his cremated body became a controversial issue, a few years ago, among the China Mainland (archaeological) scholars. The focal point of the issue revolve’s around the insurgent ‘Huang Ch’ao’s grave-stealing Incident’near the end of the T’ang Dynasty (618-907 A.D.), leading to the evacuation of the holy bone relics to Chungnan Mountain Tzu-ko Shrine. The pro-and-counter camps could not produce any conclusive proofs against each other’s counter arguments. Their contentions are simply pure hypothesized conjectures. This paper is an in-depth analysis based on the finding and insights reached by the 2003, Huh County-sponsored ‘Xuanzang Master and Tzu-ko Shrine Dialectics Symposium’ sponsored by Hsing-Chiao Shrine. Hopefully, this study can shed light on the authenticity of the issue.