臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：對著作權保護範圍擴張的因應--合理使用實務與理論基礎之研究
書刊名：政大智慧財產評論
作者：闕光威
作者(外文)：Chueh, Kuang-wei
出版日期：2007
卷期：5:2
頁次：頁53-80
主題關鍵詞：合理使用；市場失靈；對價理論；合理使用實證研究；Google print；Fair use；Market failure；Quid pro quo；Empirical studies of fair use
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:34
隨著著作權權利範圍與保障時間的擴張，著作權人更強的獨佔權利對於持續創新與知識流通可能的負面影響成為眾所關注的問題。此時，合理使用如何發揮兼顧公共利益與創作者創作誘因的機能更為重要。但本研究發現，我國現有合理使用的案件不但數量有限而且類型仍相當單純。在這種窘境下，回歸合理使用的理論基礎可能是精確瞭解合理使用的最佳解決方式。近年來美國學者所提倡的對價理論與市場失靈理論雖仍有未竟之處，但仍然提供我國司法者與社會大眾一個清晰的參考點，但進一步理論細緻化的工作，仍待進一步努力。
Along with the enlargement of the scope and duration of copyright, it is generally believed that the barrier to continual innovation and knowledge distribution also increases. How to leverage fair use to best preserve public interest thus becomes a very important issue. This research conducted a survey over fair use cases in Taiwan since 1999. It is found that the current fair use cases are limited in number and only involve straight-forward facts and are less delicate compared to similar development in other advanced countries. This paper suggests that resorting to the basic theoretical framework of fair use may be a best way to understand the fundctions of fair use. Although the current most influential theories- market failure and quid pro quo-have their own disadvantage, yet they provide a clear starting point for the judiciary and the society as a whole. That said, how to enrich the content of the current theoretical framework and make it more practicable remains a most difficult yet utmost important subject ahead of us.
期刊論文
1.Davis, Michael H.(2000)。Extending Copyright and the Constitution: "Have I Stayed Too Long?"。Fla. L. Rev.，52，989-992。  new window
2.Lunney, Glynn S. Jr.(2002)。Fair Use and Market Failure: Sony Revisited。Boston University Law Review，82，975。  new window
3.孫遠釗(2006)。槍械與扣動扳機者孰負侵權之責。政大智慧財產評論，4(1)，105-144。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉孔中(200511)。著作權法的舊命題面臨數位時代的新挑戰--Creative Commons Workshop座談會。當代，209，90-97。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴文智(2004)。數位科技對著作權授權契約及合理使用範圍之影響之研究。智慧財產權，65，119-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Brown, Hon. Hank、Miller, David(1996)。Copyright Term Extension, Sapping American Creativity。J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y，44，94。  new window
7.Chafee, Zechariah Jr.(1945)。Reflections on the Law of Copyright。Colum. L. Rev.，45，503。  new window
8.Coase, Ronald(1988)。The Firm。The Market and the Law。  new window
9.Coase, Ronald(1992)。The Institutional Structure of Production。Am. Econ. Rev.，82，713。  new window
10.Driesen, David M.、Ghosh, Shubha(2005)。The Functions of Transaction Costs, Rethinking Transaction Cost Minimization in a World of Friction。Ariz. L. Rev.，47，61。  new window
11.Dusollier, Severine(2006)。Contract Options for Individual Artists: Master's Tools v. The Master’s House: Creative Commons v. Copyright。COLUM. J. L. & ARTS，29，271。  new window
12.Ginsburg, Jane C.(2000)。The Constitutionality of Copyright Term Extension: How Long is Too Long?。Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J，18，651。  new window
13.Gordon, Wendy J.(2002)。Market Failure and Intellectual Property: A Response to Professor Lunney。B.U. L. Rev.，82。  new window
14.Hanratty, Elisabeth(2005)。Google Library: Beyond Fair Use?。Duke L. & Tech. Rev.，2005，10。  new window
15.Hetcher, Steven(2006)。The Half-Fairness of Google s Plan to Make the World s Collection of Books Searchable。MlCH, Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev.，13，1。  new window
16.Lemley, Kevin M.(2005)。The Innovation Medium Defense, A Doctrine to Pormote Multiple Goals of Copyright in the Wake of Advancing Digital Technologies。PENN St. L. Rev. Ill，110。  new window
17.Samuelson, Pamela(1996)。Regulation of Technologies to Protect Copyrighted Works。Communications of the ACM，39。  new window
18.Sunstein, Cass R.(1989)。Interpreting Status in the Regulatory State。Harv. L. Rev，103，405。  new window
19.Tushman, M. L.、Anderson, P.(1986)。Technological Distribution and Organizational Environment。Administrative Science Quarterly，31，439-465。  new window
20.Lessig, Lawrence(2006)。A Celebration: Commons & the Public Domain: Paper: Re-crafting a Public Domain。YALE J.L. & HUMAN，18，56。  new window
21.Boyle, James(2003)。The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain。Law and Contemporary Problems，66(1/2)，33-74。  new window
22.汪渡村(20040200)。論網際網路時代著作權法因應之道--以合理使用制度為中心。智慧財產權，62，102-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Gordon, Wendy J.(1982)。Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors。Columbia Law Review，82(8)，1600-1657。  new window
24.Jaszi, Peter(1996)。Caught in the Net of Copyright。OR. L. REV.，75，299。  new window
25.盧文祥(20051200)。從著作財產權授權利用之困境探討創作共享機制之推展。東吳法律學報，17(2)，249-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Lemley, Mark A.(1997)。The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law。Texas Law Review，75，989-1000。  new window
27.孫遠釗(20031000)。美國智慧財產權法最新發展與評析（2000∼2003）。政大智慧財產評論，1(1)，143-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Henderson, Rebecca M.、Clark, Kim B.(1990)。Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms。Administrative Science Quarterly，35(1)，9-30。  new window
29.Fisher, William W. Ill(1988)。Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine。HARV. L. Rev，101，1705-1717。  new window
30.Cohen, Julie E.(2000)。Copyright and the Perfect Curve。Vanderbilt Law Review，53，1799。  new window
31.Merges,Robert P.(2004)。A New Dynamism in the Public Domain。U. Chi. L. Rev.，71，183-204。  new window
32.Ginsburg, Jane C.(2001)。Copyright and Control of New Technologies of Dissemination。COLUM. L. REV.，101，1613。  new window
學位論文
1.王盈勛(2003)。軟體產業的顧客知識運用、產權與組織型式(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.盧文祥(2006)。從創新觀點檢視創作共享機制與著作權保護及知識分享擴散之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Farber, Daniel A.、Frickey, Philip P.(1991)。Law and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction。  new window
2.Peritz, Rudolph J. R.(2000)。COMPETITION POLICY IN AMERICA。  new window
3.Posner, Richard(1977)。Economic Analysis of Law。  new window
4.Scherer, F. M.(1980)。Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance。  new window
5.Litman, Jessica(2001)。Digital Copyright。  new window
6.Lessig, Lawrence(2004)。Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity。New York, NY：Penguin Press。  new window
7.Goldstein, Paul(2003)。Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg To The Celestial Jukebox。Stanford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.章忠信(2004)。著作權的強制授權。著作權法的第一堂課。台北：書泉。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊庭瑞、陳舜伶(2004)。Creative Commons權利不變，創意無限。Creative Commons中文宣傳手冊。台北：中央研究院資訊研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.Scherer, F. M.(2001)。The Innovation Lottery。EXPANDING THE BOUNDS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INNOVATION POLICY FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY。  new window
4.GORDON, WENDY J.(2002)。Excuse and Justification in the Law of Fair Use: Commodification and Market Perspectives。THE COMMODIFICATION OF INFORMATION: SOCIAL, POLITICAL, AND CULTURAL RAMIFICATIONS。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 政策研究
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：931（臺灣：920，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68318017
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上