:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:BBS圖像電子副語之判讀效率與滿意度研究
書刊名:設計學研究
作者:許子凡 引用關係林品章 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Tzu-fanLin, Pin-chang
出版日期:2009
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁83-102
主題關鍵詞:圖像電子副語判讀效率滿意度圖像複雜度Electronic paralanguage of pictographsRecognition efficiencySatisfactionGraphic complexity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:91
本研究以判讀效率與滿意度爲評估項目,對於圖像電子副語的複雜度與其使用經驗,所造成之差異關係進行探討,在操作上採二因子實驗設計,其圖像副語之複雜度共分爲「高複雜度」及「低複雜度」兩個等級,使用經驗則分爲「有BBS圖像副語使用經驗」與「無BBS圖像副語使用經驗」兩個類別;本研究經現況調查與問卷檢測,將所得資料以統計檢定,並進行討論分析後,歸納出下述四點結論:(1)在圖像副語的使用現況上,以臉部表情類的次數比例最高,肢體動作類次之,而在複雜度的分群結果中,臉部表情類多被歸爲低複雜度等級,肢體動作類則爲高複雜度等級;(2)從複雜度的觀點來看,低雜度等級的圖像副語擁有較佳且穩定之表現;(3)由使用經驗的角度,除了在輸入便利的滿意度外,其餘圖像副語的評估項目,皆是以有使用經驗者獲得較佳之成績;(4)複雜度與使用經驗問的交互作用,除偷悅回饋與輸入便利的滿意度外,在其餘項目皆呈現顯著之狀態,整體來說,圖像副語的使用評價會隨複雜度等級之降低,以及使用經驗之累積而有所提升。
Based upon two criteria, recognition efficiency and satisfaction, this study investigates the differential relationships occurred in the expressed complexity and the use-experience of electronic paralanguage of pictographs. Experimented using Two-Way ANOVA, the level of graphic complexity of electronic paralanguage of pictographs consists of "High Complexity" and "Low Complexity" and the use-experience is classified as "BBS Electronic Paralanguage of Pictographs" and "non-BBS Electronic Paralanguage of Pictographs". Four conclusions were drawn from the statistical analysis of the current states and questionnaire in this study: (1) With the use of paralanguage of pictographs, the type of facial emotion has the highest number of uses and the type of body gesture has the second highest; categorized by complexity, the type of facial emotion is classified as low complexity where the type of body gesture is of high complexity. (2) Based on complexity, the paralanguage of pictographs of low complexity exhibits better performances and stability. (3) Based on use-experience, all evaluated categories of pictographic paralanguage, except for key-in convenience, exhibits better performances when participant is experienced in BBS electronic paralanguage of pictographs. (4) Based on the interaction between complexity and use-experience, except for satisfaction of pleasant feedback and key-in convenience categories, all others display significant status; in general, the performance of paralanguage of pictographs would increase as the level of complexity decrease and the use-experience accumulated.
期刊論文
1.李義正、連德仁(20040700)。網路圖像符號之類型分析與應用研究。商業設計學報,8,213-226。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Biederman, I.、Ju, G.(1998)。Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition。Cognitive Psychology,20(1),38-64。  new window
3.Thompsen, P. A.、Foulger, D. A.(1996)。Effects of Pictographs and Quoting on Flaming in Electronic Mail。Computers in Human Behavior,12(2),225-243。  new window
4.Walther, Joseph B.(1992)。Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective。Communication Research,19(1),52-90。  new window
5.林菁(1994)。圖像複雜度與兒童的認知學習。嘉義師院學報,8。  延伸查詢new window
6.Moon, P.、Spencer, D. E.(1944)。Aesthetic measure applied to color harmony。Journal of the Optical Society of America,34(4),234-242。  new window
7.Pezdek, K.、Chen, H. C.(1982)。Development differences in the role of detail in picture recognition memory.。Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,33(2),207-215。  new window
8.Turner, Judith Axler(1988)。"E-Mail" Technology Has Boomed, but Manners of Its Users Fall Short of Perfection。The Chronicle of Higher Education,34。  new window
9.楊清田、魏碩廷(2005)。平面圖形複雜度與積量錯視之關聯性研究-以不規則多邊形為例。藝術學報,1(2)=77,13-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.謝毅彬(1994)。電腦操作圖像(icon)設計。工業設計,85,107-113。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Helbing, K. G.、Jenkins, J.、Kim, Y. S.、Miller, M. E.(1993)。Influence of Icon Detail, Color, and Perspective on Preference, Recognition Time, and Search Time。Interface '93。  new window
2.蕭坤安、伊彬(2002)。造形輪廓的複雜性認知探討。中華民國設計學會2002年設計學術研究成果研討會,台灣科技大學主辦 。台北市。321-326。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧諭緯(1998)。說文解字:初探網路語言現象及其社會意義。第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會,中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處 。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
4.Carey, J.(1980)。Paralanguage in computer mediated communication。Pennsylvania。  new window
5.Catarci, T.(1999)。Web-based information Access。Edinburgh。  new window
6.許子凡、林品章(2006)。從視覺素養探討電子佈告欄之表情符號。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.潘美岑(2004)。網際網路溝通的語言遊戲--以MSNMessenger為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.郭世謀、林加雯(1997)。論網路語彙的選擇對視覺傳達效果之影響。設計:教育、文化、科技─視覺傳達設計。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Culnan, M.、Markus, M.(1997)。Information Technologies。Handbook of Organizational Communication。Newbury Park, Ca。  new window
其他
1.Quesenbery, Whitney(2001)。What Does Usability Mean: Looking Beyond 'Ease of Use'。  new window
2.Internet Slang。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top