This paper is concentrated on the content of Presidential Criminal Immunity, which includes its definition, regulation, objective, scope, time-limit and its nature when confronting criminal prosecution procedures. Furthermore, this paper brings about several key issues for detail discussions. First of all, will the Presidential Criminal Immunity be only confined to criminal charges? Will it cover the civil lawsuits? Secondly, what if the president does abandon the right of criminal Immunity? Thirdly, according to article 167(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, everyone being obliged to testify in court, can the president be exempted from it? Or is this contradicting the constitution article 52? Finally, besides the right of criminal immunity, does the president have the authority to classify the documents for national security purpose? As for the prosecutors or judges, already knowing the president's criminal immunity, will they be facing the risk of violating article 125 of criminal law "abusing one's authority", when they take judicial proceedings? Being specifically demanded by the council of Grand Justice Ruling No. 627, the Legislative Yuan is obligated to revise and promote regulatory procedures with respect to the president resisting being searched or detained, refusing to testify in court and rejecting to submit relevant evidences. The Legislative Yuan should consider the necessity of augmenting such procedure or to maintain the status quo. It is up to the Legislative Yuan to design new schemes or conduct different level of overhaul on existing preliminary injunction. In addition, the Grand Justice Ruling No.627 also leaves plenty of room for arbitrary explanation. For example, what measures may be regarded as "not directly affecting the implementation of dignity and authority of the president"? What is "other measures objectively considered hampering or harming the president's authority or dignity"? What criteria are to judge the president "willingly cooperative to assist the ongoing investigation"? All this matters challenge the judging abilities of law enforcement officers. As for violation, the procedure effect in the specific case, may it be resorted to criminal law article 158(4) for solution by ruling out the evidences, or should it have other considerations? These are big issues to be faced for the judicial official and academic circle.