期刊論文1. | Beall, Christopher P.(1997)。The Scientological Defenestration of Choice-of-Law Doctrines for Publication Torts on the Internet。J. Marshall J.Computer & Info. L.,15,363。 |
2. | Von Mehren(1975)。Choice-of-Law Theories and the Comparative-Law Problem。Am. J. Comp. L.,23,751+753。 |
3. | Bumstein, Matthew R.(1996)。Conflicts on the Net: Choice of Law in Transnational Cyberspace。Vand. J. Transnat'l L.,29,108-110。 |
4. | Hardy, I. Trotter(1994)。The Proper Legal Regime for Cyberspace。University of Pittsburgh Law Review,55,993-1020。 |
5. | Faucher, John D.(1993)。Let the Chips Fall Where They May: Choice of Law in Computer Bulletin Board Defamation Cases。U.C. Davis L. Rev.,26,1066-1072。 |
6. | Brooks, Thomas D.(1995)。Catching Jellyfish in the Internet: The Public-Figure Doctrine and Defamation on Computer Bulletin Boards。RUTGERS Computer & Tech. L.J.,21,461。 |
7. | Weber, Jeremy S.(1995)。Defining CyberLibel: A First Amendment Limit for Libel Suits Against Individuals Arising From Computer Bulletin Board Speech。Case W. Res. L. Rev.,46,235。 |
8. | Symeonides, Symeon C.(2000)。Choice of Law in the American Courts in 1999: One More Year。The American Journal of Comparative Law,48,143-180。 |
9. | Miller, Leigh Anne(1993)。Choice-of-Law Approaches in Tort Actions。American Journal of Trail Advocacy,16。 |
10. | Juenger, Friedrich K.(1984)。Conflict of Laws: A Critique of Interest Analysis。The American Journal of Comparative Law,32,1-4。 |
11. | Carson, Lynn Darrow(1990)。Choice of Law Issues in Mass Tort Litigation。Journal of Air Law and Commerce,56。 |
12. | 陳長文(19840700)。國際私法方法論之回顧與展望。法令月刊,35(7),5-8。 延伸查詢 |
13. | 陳長文(19840600)。國際私法方法論之回顧與展望。法令月刊,35(6),6-9。 延伸查詢 |
14. | Symeonides, Symeon C.(2004)。Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2003: Seventeenth Annual Survey。Am, J. COMP. L.,52。 |
15. | Pielemeier, James R.(2003)。Choice of law for multistate defamation--the state of affairs as internet defamation beckons。ARIZ. St. L. J.,35。 |
16. | Johnson, David R.、Post, David G.(1996)。Law and borders: The rise of law in cyberspace。Stanford Law Review,48(5),1367-1402。 |