本文在寫作方法上有兩大特點：其一，我不採取引經據典、消文釋義的方式，而採取玄論的方式；忽略理論出處及前後繼承的問題，直接以道理本身的層次為依據；這樣的寫法，不是嚴謹的學術論文，而我自始即不是要寫嚴謹的學術論文；雖非嚴謹的學術論文，卻不是無所說，或隨便亂說；再者，對於創造性詮釋，引經據典沒那麼重要。其二，我採取融會儒道佛中西印宗教哲學的寫法，許多概念、許多理論都有承襲依據，但這都無法一一詳談了。這樣的企圖心嚇人，這樣的目標或許一時不容易達成，個人的能力確實也極有限；但是，以問題為核心，以體會思維為主軸，以中西印宗教哲學理論為參考的讀法，我始終未改變；而且我深信，小題大作固然是論文的常軌，宏觀融會性的論文應該也有它的價值，學術界應該容許它存在的空間。異於傳統註解前賢與排比資料的寫法，問題與道理自有它的層次與理路，擺脫資料，直抒己意，或許還更符合「論文」的本意；可惜今人大多遺忘了。這兩點彼此也有關係，當論文內容牽涉中西印宗教哲學時，要引經據典當然就更加困難了。實體顯現論是一整套理論，仔細探討，應該是一本書，而不是一篇短文；本文只是大輅椎輪，勉為其難而已。 現象論很難解釋實體，實體論很難說明現象；不管是現象論或實體論，都難以圓滿說明實體和現象之間的轉換關係。實體顯現論固然是個人素來對問題的思考，同時也是在傳統實體論現象論思維之外的一條解決蹊徑。從個體的誕生，說到個體的遭遇，背後一貫的理論，就是實體顯現論。實體顯現論既不完全是儒家，也不完全是佛家。這是我個人對存在的一點體會與猜想，所以標題說是「臆測」；它不完全是客觀的註解或研討，讀者幸勿誤會。總而言之，存在就是有限，生命必然困苦。個體從誕生到消逝，就是一段流血流淚的歷程；這首存在者生死流轉的歌曲，聞之鼻酸。可是你我都逃脫不了這個命運，看清真相，粉墨登場，賣力演出吧！

This context has two big features on writing method: First, I didn’t citation， decrease article and lose meanings method but use metaphysics’ method; ignored the theory source and the problem of inherit from before and after, standing on using the trut itself level directly; this kind of writing style is not a religious academic thesis and don't want to write the religious one from the start; although it is not a religious academic thesis but not say it casually. Second, I adopt to combine the writing style of the Buddhism, Confucianist and China and west’ religion philosophy, many generalideas and lot of theory all have to adopt authority, but it can’t explain in detail. This kind of attempt is scared one, maybe this goal couldn’t accomplish easily in short time and personal ability is truly limited; but use problem as a center to realize thought as main, use India religion philosophy theory as the read method, I never changed; and Ibelieve in deeply, s always the usual track of academic thesis, should has its worth， should admit it has the existed space. It has relationship between this two point，when a thesis’s content involve in west.Indian religion must have to citation of course itis more difficult. Is a series theory, research carefully, it should be a book not a shortwriting; I just force on it. Phenomenology is difficult to explain ontology，and its theory is very difficult to illustrate phenomenon; no matter phenomenology or ontology are difficult to come to perfect to explain the transform relationship between entity and phenomenology.Indeed ontology is usual considerate individually and additionally it is also the solvepath out of traditional ontology and phenomenology consideration. From individual to be born to experience and the behind a series of theory, that is ontology. Ontology isincomplete the Confucianist and not the Buddhism absolutely.This is my personalappreciate and guess toward the existence; therefore the title “surmise”; it isn’t theobjective explanation, research or discussion, readers do not misunderstanding. Tosum up, existence is limited, life is hardship certainly. An individual comes into being to die out, that is exacting track. The song made nomad white-knuckle, it’s so sad tohear that. But we get away circumstance, needing found out truth and give onaperformance in efforts.