資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.216.40.129)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
探討高二學生在三角探究教學中的解題表現
書刊名:
科學教育學刊
作者:
秦爾聰
/
林勇吉
/
陳俊源
作者(外文):
Chin, Erh-tsung
/
Lin, Yung-chi
/
Chen, Chun-yuan
出版日期:
2009
卷期:
17:5
頁次:
頁433-458
主題關鍵詞:
三角學
;
探究
;
解題表現
;
Inquiry
;
Problem solving performance
;
Trigonometry
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(
2
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:0
點閱:32
本研究旨在探討高二學生在三角探究教學中的「解題表現」。研究採個案研究,透過課室錄影、錄音、教學日誌、學習單與訪談獲得所需資料。研究參與者為中部地區,國立高中二年級自然組學生43 位,利用六個週末之輔導課進行(每次四節課)。研究發現歸納學生在探究教學中五種主要解題策略:(1) 論證:透過臆測與論證解題;(2) 統整:使用統整知識解題;(3) 公式:直接以三角公式解題;(4) 畢氏:使用畢氏定理解題;(5) 直觀:以臆測或觀察解題。其中,「論證」是探究教學中,學生主要使用的解題策略。
以文找文
The purpose of this study was to investigate the high school students’ “problem solving performance” when getting involved in the inquiry approach trigonometry teaching. Qualitative case study method was adopted as the research design and the data collection included videotaped and audio-taped classroom teaching practice, group interviews, teacher’s journals and students’ worksheets. The participants were forty-three 11th grade students of a national high school in the middle of Taiwan. Twenty-four hours extra-courses were implemented in six weekends. The research results indicated that there appeared five problem solving approaches: (1) via argumentation; (2) using integrated knowledge; (3) using trigonometric formula; (4) using Pythagorean Theorem; (5) intuition.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Susan, B. J.(2003)。Learning Environment, Motivation, and Achievement in High School Science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40(4),347-368。
2.
Chinnappan, M.(1998)。Schemas and mental in geometry problem solving。Educational Studies in Mathematics,36(3),201-217。
3.
Barrow, L. H.(2006)。A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards。Journal of Science Teacher Education,17(3),265-278。
4.
Anderson, R. D.(2002)。Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry。Journal of Science Teacher Education,13(1),1-12。
5.
Goos, M.(2004)。Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry。Journal for Research in Mahtematics Education,35(4),258-291。
6.
Cavanagh, M.(2008)。Trigonometry from a Different Angle。The Australian Mathematics Teacher,64(1),25-30。
7.
Doerr, H. M.(2006)。Examining the Tasks of Teaching When Using Students' Mathematical Thinking。Educational Studies in Mathematics,62,3-24。
8.
Fisher, L. C.(1988)。Strategies Used by Secondary Mathematics Teachers to Solve Proportion Problems。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,19(2),157-168。
9.
Lederman, N. G.、Niess, M. L.(2000)。Problem Solving and Solving Problems: Inquiry about Inquiry。School Science and Mathematics,100(3),113-116。
10.
Quinlan, C.(2004)。Sparking Interest in Trigono Metry。The Australian Mathematics Teacher,60(3),17-20。
11.
Peressini, D.、Knuth, E.(2000)。The Role of Tasks in Developing Communities of Mathematical Inquiry。Teaching Children Mathematics,6(6),391-397。
12.
Siegel, M.、Borasi, R.、Fonzi, J.(1998)。Supporting Students' Mathematical Inquiries through Reading。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,29(4),378-413。
13.
Weber, K.(2005)。Students' Understanding of Trigonometric Functions。Mathematics Education Research Journal,17(3),92-112。
14.
Whitin, P.(2006)。Meeting the Challenges of Negotiated Mathematical Inquiry。Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry and Reflective Practice,21(1),59-83。
15.
Wood, T.、Williams, G.、McNeal, B.(2006)。Children's Mathematical Thinking Revealed in Different Classroom Cultures。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,37(3),222-255。
16.
Yerushalmy, M.(2000)。Problem Solving Strategies and Mathematical Resources: A Longitudinal View on Problem Solving in a Functional Based Approach to Algebra。Educational Studies in Mathematics,43,125-147。
17.
Yerushalmy, M.、Chazan, D.、Gordon, M.(1990)。Mathematical Problem Posing: Implications for Facilitating Student Inquiry in Classrooms。Instructional Science,19,219-245。
18.
Zaslavsky, O.(2005)。Seizing the Opportunity to Create Uncertainty in Learning Mathematics。Educational Studies in Mathematics,60,297-321。
會議論文
1.
Diezmann, C. M.(2004)。Assessing Learning from Mathematics Inquiry: Challenges for Students, Teachers and Researchers80-85。
圖書
1.
胡守仁、E. Maor(2000)。毛起來說三角。臺北市:天下遠見出版有限公司。
延伸查詢
2.
Marzano, Robert J.(1988)。Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction。The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。
3.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。
4.
Gove, P. B.(1986)。Webster's Third International Dictionary。Springfield, MA:Merriam-Webster INC.。
5.
Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985)。Mathematical problem solving。Orlando, Florida。
6.
Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。
7.
Borasi, R.(1996)。Reconceiving Mathematics Instruction: A Focus on Errors。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。
8.
Blackett, N.、Tall, D. O.(1991)。Gender and the Versatile Learning of Trigonometry Using Computer Software。Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1。Assisi, Italy。
9.
Minstrell, J.(2000)。Implications for Teaching and Learning Inquiry: A Summary。Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science。Washington, DC。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
數學探究之意義初探與教學設計實例
2.
小組建立假設的合作探究策略--以網路環境為例
3.
以真實數學教育觀點談設計數學史融入課室之解題活動經驗分享
1.
以建模觀點詮釋國中資優生的數學解題活動:以問題解決及專題研究為例
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code