最高法院之見解乃代表我國實務上對於詰問制度操作之軌跡，因此，探討實務見解將有助於釐清其運作之現況，並使我國操作交互詰問制度時所產生之問題，得以獲得進一步之資訊。關於我國實務上對於交互詰問及其相關議題之看法，最高法院著有諸多判決可供參照，本文嘗試蒐集我國實務上與詰問程序有關之見解，就我國現今實務上關於交互詰問之運作仍存有那些問題予以檢討，並本於評論之觀點，提出批判之意見，期藉由對於實務判決之分析及評論，使吾人更能瞭解現行詰問制度所產生之缺失及對實務運作所帶來之疑義，以使詰問制度之盲點能獲得完全之解決。

The comments of the Supreme Court represent a track built by how cross-examination systems perform practically. Therefore, the way to make use of the practical understandings may help to clarify the process of present performance and gain further information when the operational problems appear. In terms of practical views and related issues on the procedure of cross-examination, the verdicts made by the Supreme Court may consider as a reference. This article thus collects practical understandings related to cross-examination procedure and explores the existing problems of the performance. This article, based on the views of commentary, gives opinions about practical verdicts and evaluates the weak aspects and doubts of cross-examination performance with a hope to solve some of the unnoticed problems.