:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由各國航運稅制論我國因應之道
書刊名:航運季刊
作者:李佳逸 引用關係張志清 引用關係包嘉源呂頌揚
作者(外文):Li, Marie Chia-yiChang, Chih-chingBao, Jya-yuanLu, Song-yang
出版日期:2009
卷期:18:3
頁次:頁91-111
主題關鍵詞:航運稅制航運政策船舶登記制度權宜船噸位稅Shipping taxation schemeShipping policyShip registry systemFlag of convenienceTonnage tax
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:59
航運業因從事跨國經濟活動,而常可選擇在某一低稅國設立子公司,並將其屬輪以該公司名義在該國登記,以降低稅賦負擔。此等現象造成權宜船盛行,而使許多傳統海運國家之國輪船隊大量出籍。各國為能維持一定數量之國輪船隊,乃提供優惠之船舶登記制度及航運優惠稅制,包括國際船舶登記制度、第二船籍制度、噸位稅制、投資抵免等。我國亦考慮採行歐盟國家之噸位稅制以吸引本國航商將其屬輪登記回籍。惟因航運業常能選擇對其最有利之稅制,而造成國際稅制競爭,而有必要比較分析各國航運稅制之內容。本文探討開放船籍登記制度、航運稅制、以及各國之航運優惠稅制,包括新加坡、香港、英國、日本、韓國及中國之航運稅制,以提供我國制定航運優惠稅制的參考。
Shipping companies engage in multi-national economic activities across the world, therefore opting for a country with favorable taxation policies becomes a common practice for ship registry. Such operation causes a great number of ships in traditional maritime countries to flag out, resulting in the prevalence of flag of convenience. In response to the phenomenon, each country offers preferential ship registry systems and favorable shipping taxation policies to maintain its minimum national-owned ships. These policies include international ship registry system, second registry system, tonnage tax scheme, capital allowance and etc. Our government is also contemplating upon adopting the EU tonnage tax system to draw in domestic flagged-out ships. This article explores issues regarding various open registry schemes, shipping taxation regimes, and discusses different preferential shipping taxation systems administered in Singapore, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea and China. By reference to these successful examples, Taiwan will make efforts in designing a better taxation package in the face of severe declines in national ships, and will further facilitate the domestic shipping industry in achieving its full economic potential.
期刊論文
1.Toh, R. and Phang, S. Y.,(1993)。“Quasi-Flag of Convenience Shipping: The Wave of the Future”。Transportation Journal,vol. 33,no. 2,pp. 31-39。  new window
2.張志清(19990300)。新加坡之海運發展政策。航運季刊,8(1),44-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Alderton, T. and Winchester, N.(2002)。“Flag States and Safety 1997-1999”。Maritime Policy and Management,29(2),151-162。  new window
4.Knudsen, K.(1997)。The Economics of Zero Taxation of the World Shipping Industry。Maritime Policy and Management,24(1),45-54。  new window
5.Tenold, S.(2003)。A Most Convenient Flag--The Basis for the Expansion of the Singapore Fleet, 1969-82。Maritime Policy and Management,30(3),255-268。  new window
6.劉祥得、方福樑(20050600)。未來全球船員短缺問題--兼論我國船員人力資源政策。航運季刊,14(2),21-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張志清、陳一平、林光(20011200)。國輪出籍問題與因應對策之研究10(4),1-18。  延伸查詢new window
8.Cullinane, K. and Robertshaw, M.(1996)。“The Influence of Qualitative Factors in Isle of Man Ship Registration Decisions”。Maritime Policy and Management,Vol. 23, No. 4,pp. 321-336。  new window
9.Lifson, D. A. and Bentley, P. E.(2005)。“International Shipping Industry Benefit from Recent Tax Change”。The CPA Journal,Vol. LXXV, No. 6。  new window
10.Selkou, E. and Roe, M.(2002)。“Comment UK Tonnage Tax: Subsidy or Special Case?”。Maritime Policy and Management,Vol. 29, No. 4。  new window
11.Leggate, H. and McConville, J.(2005)。“Tonnage Tax: Is It Working?”。Maritime Policy and Management,Vol. 32, No. 2,pp. 177-186。  new window
12.Kiriazidis, T.(1995)。“Recent Aspects of th e EU Maritime Transport Policy”。Maritime Policy and Management,Vol. 22, No. 2,pp. 179-186。  new window
13.Lee, T. W.(1996)。“Flagging Options for the Future”。Maritime Policy and Management,Vol. 23, No. 2,pp. 177-186。  new window
14.陳昊旻(2000)。“從消失中的美國船旗看我國國輪未來之發展”。海運月刊,十二月號,頁2-12。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.UNCTAD(1974)。Review of Maritime Transport。New York and Geneva。  new window
2.方福樑(2004)。國際運輸工人聯盟與權宜旗船之關係。臺北。頁85-96。  延伸查詢new window
3.包嘉源、張志清、林光(2006)。航運發展之新挑戰-以實施噸位稅為例頁443-461。  延伸查詢new window
4.盧水田(2004)。我國航運界船員供需現況探討。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Lord A. and Weedon Q. C.(1999)。Independent Enquiry into A Tonnage Tax – A Report by the Lord Alexander。  new window
2.李彌、曾國雄等(1998)。亞洲已開發國家航運政策之比較分析。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫克難、王健全、黃耀輝(1997)。促進產業升級條例租稅減免獎勵措施之全面評估。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.張志清(2008)。我國海運公司對稅制選擇因素之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.相重發(2002)。總體環境及產業環境對成功關鍵因素影響之探討-以散裝國輪為例。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾景男(2007)。歐盟各國實施噸位稅之成效。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林光、張志清(2006)。海運學。臺北市:航貿文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.交通部運輸研究所(1997)。成立國輪造船及購船融資基金之研究。臺北:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.APExper國際租稅規劃部(2007)。境外公司操作聖經。大樹林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hong Kong Shipping Register User’s Handbook。  new window
5.ISL(1994)。Shipping Statistics and Market Review。  new window
6.Ready, N. P.(1994)。Ship Registration。  new window
7.交通部(2006)。船舶登記法及船舶規費之檢討研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.交通部(1995)。發展第二船籍登記制度可行性之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.交通部(2003)。海運實施噸位稅相關資料蒐集分析之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.交通部運輸研究所(2006)。海運實施噸位稅可行性之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.金賢淑(譯);水上千之(2000)。船舶國籍與方便旗船籍。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.香港海事處(2002)。香港船舶註冊用者須知,香港。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top