:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Social Decision-making Processes in Local Contexts: An STS Case Study on Nuclear Power Plant Siting in Japan
書刊名:East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
作者:Juraku, KohtaSuzuki, TatsujiroSakura, Osamu
出版日期:2007
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁53-75
主題關鍵詞:Social decision-making processNuclear powerLocal contextsReferendumRelevant marginal actor
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:14
本稿は、日本における原子力発電所立地の社会的意思決定プロセスについての、科学技術の社会学的な観点からの事例研究である。エネルギー技術は現代社会にとって死活的に重要であるが、その研究開発から社会への導入までのあらゆる局面で大きな論争を巻き起こすこともしばしばである。とりわけ、原子力技術の開発・利用については、世界各国で多数の社会的な衝突を招いてきた経緯がある。本稿では、実際の意思決定プロセスの事例を例に取り、その経緯を詳しく追うことで、参加型意思決定手法の適用とその結果について、事例に基づいた示唆を得ることを目指す。取り上げる事例は新潟県巻町の事例である。社会学的な分析によって、原子力発電所立地をめぐる住民投票の実現や、それによる立地中止という経緯について、何が決定的に重要だったのかを特定したい。特に、地域特有の微妙かつ込み入った社会的な文脈に焦点を当て、「relevant marginal actor 」と呼ぶべき主体が重要な役割を担ったことを指摘するとともに、論争的な技術をめぐる社会的意思決定を考える際の分析概念としての可能性を探る。
This is an STS case study of the social decision-making process on the siting of a nuclear power plant in Japan, from the point of view of a sociological case analysis. Energy technologies are critically important for industrial society but often trigger serious disputes through the R&D phase and the phase involving introduction into society. Nuclear power technology especially has provoked a lot of conflicts all over the world. By focusing on serious trust issues among decision-making processes and stakeholders, we found very interesting consequences and/or results of participatory social decision-making process in nuclear issues. As an example, we take up the case of a local referendum in the siting area (Maki-machi town, Niigata prefecture of Japan) and describe and analyze it to highlight the critical sociological factors involved in the application of participatory methods in social decision-making processes regarding technological issues. Through this description and analysis, we would like to emphasize the effects of the complicated and subtle structure of local context on the consequence of local decision-making processes. We then propose a concept, “relevant marginal actor,” to clarify which actors play critical roles in the whole local decision-making process in which controversial technological issues are framed, and reframed.
期刊論文
1.Matsumoto, Miwao(2005)。The Uncertain but Crucial Relationship between a 'New Energy' Technology and Global Environmental Problems。Social Studies of Science,35(4),623-651。  new window
2.Irwin, Alan(2006)。The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the 'New' Scientific Governance。Social Studies of Science,36(2),299-320。  new window
3.Thurston, W. E.、MacKean, G.、Vollman, A.、Casebeer, A.、Weber, M.、Maloff, B.(2005)。Public participation in regional health policy: A theoretical framework。Health Policy,73,237-252。  new window
4.Abelson, J.(2001)。Understanding the role of contextual influences on local health-care decision making: case study results from Ontario, Canada。Social Science & Medicine,53,777-793。  new window
5.Juraku, K.、Ohkawa, Y.、Suzuki, T.(2005)。Social decision making process for siting of nuclear power plants in Japan-case studies on Maki-machi and Hokkaido。The Journal of the Research of Science and Technology for Society,165-174。  new window
6.Pickett, S. E.(1999)。To overcome the wall around the “village” of nuclear technology: a comparative study on the consensus building process in Japanese and US cases。Energy Forum,2,32-36。  new window
7.Smith, L. G.、Nell, C. Y.、Prystupa, M. V.(1997)。The converging dynamics of interest representation in resources management。Environmental Management,21(2),139-146。  new window
8.Stirling, A.(2005)。Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology。Japan Journal for Science Technology and Society,14,63-83。  new window
9.Yearley, S.(1992)。Green ambivalence about science: Legal-rational authority and the scientific legitimation of a social movement。British Journal of Sociology,43(4),511-532。  new window
10.Abelson, Julia、Forest, Pierre-Gerlier、Eyles, John、Smith, Patricia、Martin, Elisabeth、Gauvin, Francois-Pierre(2003)。Deliberations about Deliberative Methods: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes。Social Science and Medicine,57(2),239-251。  new window
11.Rowe, Gene、Frewer, Lynn J.(2000)。Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation。Science, Technology & Human Values,25(1),3-29。  new window
會議論文
1.Juraku, K.、Ohkawa, Y.、Suzuki, T.、Sakura, O.(2006)。Social decision making process for siting of nuclear power plants in Japan-case studies on Maki-machi and Hokkaido。The 9th international conference on public communication of science and technology。Seoul。  new window
2.Lin, K.(2006)。Inequalities, knowledge and public deliberation: Three consensus conferences in Taiwan。The east asian science, technology and society: an international journal conference。Taipei。  new window
3.Matsumoto, M.、Nishide, T.、Ohi, N.(2004)。The path-dependency of renewable energy technology and the role of relevant outsiders。Tokyo。19-31。  new window
圖書
1.Matsumoto, M.(2002)。The Failure of the Science-Technology-Society Interface。Tokyo:Iwanami Shoten。  new window
2.Hecht, Gabrielle(1998)。The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
3.Matsumoto, Miwao(2006)。Technology Gatekeepers for War and Peace。Basingstoke, UK:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
4.Imai, H.(2000)。The local referendum-beyond the 'audience' democracy。Tokyo:Iwanami Shinsho。  new window
5.Kiba, T.(2003)。For the knowledge society in future: Beyond the petit experts syndrome。Tokyo:Nihon Keizai Hyoron-sya。  new window
6.Kobayashi, T.(2004)。Who does think about science and technology: A trial of consensus conference。Nagoya, Japan:Nagoya Univ. Press。  new window
7.Nakazawa, H.(2005)。Local referendum movement and local regime: Maki-machi of Niigata prefecture and a narrow lane for the radical democracy, 1994-2004。Tokyo:Harvest company。  new window
8.Niigata Nippo Press Bureau(1997)。A town reject the nuclear power plant: A reportage on the public opinion of Maki-machi。Tokyo:Iwanami Shoten。  new window
9.Oyama, K.(2002)。The study of public administration of energy governance。Tokyo:Keio University Press。  new window
10.Wynne, B.(1987)。Risk management and hazardous wastes。Berlin:Springer。  new window
11.Kingdon, John W.(1995)。Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies。Longman。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jasper, J.(1992)。Three nuclear energy controversies。Controversies: Politics of technical decisions。Newbury Park:Sage。  new window
2.Kaplan, L.(2000)。Public participation in nuclear facility decisions: Lessons from Hanford。Science, technology and democracy。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
3.Nelkin, D.(1992)。Science, technology, and political conflict: Analyzing the issues。Controversies: Politics of technical decisions。Newbury Park:Sage。  new window
4.Pinch, Trevor J.、Bijker, Wiebe E.(1987)。The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other。The social construction of technological systems。Cambridge:The MIT Press。  new window
5.Wynne, B.(1996)。Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science。Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE