:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Yu-dative Construction "V+yu+IO" in Archaic Chinese: A Cognitive Typological Perspective
書刊名:語言暨語言學
作者:潘秋平
作者(外文):Phua, Chiew-pheng
出版日期:2009
卷期:10:4
頁次:頁765-818
主題關鍵詞:V+于+IO句式上古漢語認知語法語義地圖V+yu+IO constructionArchaic ChineseCognitive grammarSemantic map
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:90
This paper argues against the received view that the two yu-dative constructions in Archaic Chinese, viz. “V+yu+IO” and “V+DO+yu+IO” have the same semantic structure by offering several empirical observations to show that this derivation hypothesis is suspicious. Moreover, this paper also demonstrates that even though the two yu-dative constructions make reference to the same conceptual content, their profiles are different. Hence, in accordance with the preliminaries of Cognitive Grammar, “V+yu+IO” and “V+DO+yu+IO” differ semantically. This paper further explores the semantic structure of “V+yu+IO” in Archaic Chinese from both Cognitive Grammar and Semantic Map perspectives. It will be demonstrated that the semantic extensions exhibited by both “V+yu+IO” and “V+DO+yu+IO” constructions occupy different contiguous areas on a single semantic map, which further justifies the idea that the semantic structure of the “V+yu+IO” construction, which is different from that of “V+DO+yu+IO”, assumes an important role in determining its own extensions, which include the comitativeexperiencer, instrumental, passive, and comparative constructions.
期刊論文
1.Kemmer, Suzanne、Verhagen, Arie(1994)。The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events。Cognitive Linguistics,5(2),115-156。  new window
2.Peyraube, Alain(1989)。History of the passive constructions in Chinese until the 10th century。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,17(2),335-372。  new window
3.Hopper, Paul J.、Thompson, Sandra A.(1980)。Transitivity in grammar and discourse。Language,56(2),251-299。  new window
4.魏培泉(19930400)。古漢語介詞「於」的演變略史。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,62(4),717-786。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Peyraube, Alain(1986)。Shuangbinyu jiegou-cong Handai zhi Tangdai de lishi fazhan。中國語文,1986(3),204-215。  new window
6.潘秋平(2007)。Double-object construction in Archaic Chinese: a preliminary proposal from the constructional perspective。Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics,1(2),59-98。  new window
7.潘秋平(2008)。Direct and indirect objects in Archaic Chinese: a cognitive linguistics perspective。語言暨語言學,9(3),547-584。new window  new window
8.Qi, Shi-Chang(1993)。Gu Hanyu shizhi beidong yongfa。古漢語研究,1993(4),22-26。  new window
9.Shi, Bing(2003)。Ye lun jieci 'yu' de qiyuan he fazhan。中國語文,2003(4),343-347。  new window
10.Xie, Hui-Quan、Hong, Bo(1988)。"Yu" "yu" jieci yongfa yuanliu kao。語言研究論叢,5,116-139。  new window
11.Dong, Xiu-Fang(2006)。Gu Hanyu zhong dongming zhijian “yu/yu” de gongneng zai renshi。古漢語研究,2006(2),2-8。  new window
12.梅祖麟(2004)。Jieci 'yu' zai jiaguwen he Han-Zangyu li de qiyuan。中國語文,2004(4),323-332。  new window
13.Pulleyblank, Edwin G.(1986)。The Locative Particles yu于,yu於, and hu 乎。JAOS,106,1-12。  new window
會議論文
1.Peyraube, Alain(1989)。History of the comparative construction in Chinese from the 5th century B.C. to the 14th century A.D.。The Second International Conference on Sinology。Taipei:Academia Sinica。589-612。  new window
學位論文
1.Rice, Sally(1987)。Toward a Cognitive Model of Transitivity,San Diego。  new window
2.Reynolds, Robert(1996)。Passives in Classical and Han Chinese: Typological Considerations,Madison。  new window
3.Yan, Yaoliang(2003)。The Grammaticalization of Yu from a Verb to a Function Word,Minneapolis。  new window
4.Kabata, Kaori(2000)。Japanese Ni: A Cognitive Analysis of a Lexically Complex Particle,Edmonton。  new window
圖書
1.Peyraube, Alain(1988)。Syntaxe diachronique du chinois: Évolution des constructions datives du 14e siècle av. J.-C. au 18e siècle。Syntaxe diachronique du chinois: Évolution des constructions datives du 14e siècle av. J.-C. au 18e siècle。Paris。  new window
2.Langacker, R.(1990)。Foundations of Cognitive Grammar -- Descriptive Application。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
3.Anderson, John M.(1971)。The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Dixon, Robert M. W.(2005)。A Semantic Approach to English Grammar。A Semantic Approach to English Grammar。Oxford and New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Taylor, John R.(2002)。Cognitive Grammar。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Croft, William(2003)。Typology and Universals。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Croft, William(1990)。Typology and universals。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Comrie, Bernard(1989)。Language Universals and Linguistic Typology。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
10.Croft, William(1991)。Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information。University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Heine, B.(1997)。Cognitive foundations of grammar。New York:Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Langacker, Ronald W.(1991)。Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive application。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
13.Langacker, Ronald W.(1999)。Grammar and Conceptualization。Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
14.Sun, Chao-Fen(1996)。Word-order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
15.Wittgenstein, L.、Anscombe, G. E. M.(1953)。Philosophical Investigations。Oxford, England:New York:Blackwell Publishers:Macmillan。  new window
16.屈萬里(1997)。尚書今註今譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊伯峻、何樂士(1992)。古漢語語法及其發展。語文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.龔煌城(20020000)。漢藏語研究論文集。臺北:中央研究院語言學研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Lakoff, George(1987)。Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind。Chicago, IL:Chicago University Press。  new window
20.Heine, Bernd、Kuteva, Tania(2002)。World Lexicon of Grammaticalization。Cambridge University Press。  new window
21.Goldberg, Adele Eva(1995)。Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure。University of Chicago Press。  new window
22.Pulleyblan, Edwin G.(1995)。Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar。UBC Press。  new window
23.Croft, William A.(2001)。Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective。Oxford University Press。  new window
24.Haspelmath, Martin(2003)。The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison。The new psychology of language (2)。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
25.Dixon, Robert M. W.(2000)。A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning。Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity。Cambridge/New York。  new window
26.Peyraube, Alain(1987)。The double object construction in Lunyu and Mengzi。Wang Li Memorial Volumes: English Volumes。HongKong。  new window
27.Van Belle, William、Langendonck, Willy Van(1996)。The Dative (1) Descriptive Studies。The Dative (1) Descriptive Studies。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。  new window
28.Van Hoecke, Willy(1996)。The Latin dative。The Dative (1) Descriptive Studies。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。  new window
29.Davidse, Kristin(1998)。The dative as participant role versus the indirect object: on the need to distinguish two layers of organization。The Dative (2) Theoretical and Contrastive Studies。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。  new window
30.Wischer, Ilse、Diewald, Gabriele(2002)。New Reflections on Grammaticalization。New Reflections on Grammaticalization。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。  new window
31.朱德熙(1992)。語法講義。語法講義。北京。  延伸查詢new window
32.Dixon, Robert M. W.、Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.(2000)。Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity。Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity。Cambridge/New York。  new window
33.郭錫良(1998)。Jieci 'yu' de qiyuan he fazhan。古漢語語法論集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
34.Haspelmath, Martin(2001)。Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages。Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。  new window
35.Heine, B.(1990)。The dative in Ik and Kanuri。Studies in Typology and Diachrony: Papers Presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on His 75th Birthday。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。  new window
36.Hong, Bo、Zeng, Xiao-Yu、Wang, Yan-Dong(2005)。Litihua Gudai Hanyu Jiaocheng。Litihua Gudai Hanyu Jiaocheng。Beijing。  new window
37.Langacker, Ronald W.(2008)。Cognitive Grammar。Cognitive Grammar。Oxford and New York。  new window
38.Næss, Åshild(2007)。Prototypical Transitivity。Prototypical Transitivity。Amsterdam/Philadelphia。  new window
其他
1.張敏(2008)。Kongjian ditu he yuyi ditu shang de "chang" yu "bian": yi Hanyu beidong, shiyi, chuzhi, gongju, shouyi deng guanxi biaoji wei li。  new window
2.Malchukov, Andrej,Haspelmath, Martin,Comrie, Bernard(2007)。Ditransitive constructions: a typological review。  new window
圖書論文
1.Peyraube, Alain(1996)。Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax。New Horizons in Chinese Linguistics。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE