:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:三○年代韓國文壇對現代主義詩的受容
書刊名:臺灣文學學報
作者:崔末順 引用關係
作者(外文):Choi, Mal-soon
出版日期:2009
卷期:15
頁次:頁33-77
主題關鍵詞:三○年代韓國文學現代主義詩審美現代性殖民資本主義李箱Korean literature in the 1930sModernist poetryAesthetic modernityColonial capitalismYi Sang金起林金光均吳章煥鄭芝溶白石
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
三O年代韓國的現代主義文學,一方面反映了資本主義發展所帶來的社會變化,另一方面對殖民統治的體驗,做出了多樣的文學應對。其中,透過技巧和形式上的實驗,捕捉現代感覺,達到全新的美學效果,是不同於以往文學的主要特徵,可以說,西方現代主義思潮的接受及大量生產,對殖民資本主義現代做出的文學反應,是具有審美現代性特徵。本文主要是以西方現代主義文學 的影響關係、對當代殖民資本主義現代的認知,以及韓國變容樣貌為基準,考察了三○年代現代主義文學的三個面向共六位作家的詩作。 首先,屬於早期作家的金起林和金光均:在文學風格上兩者雖有差異,但大體來講,技法上他們受到英美現代主義系列意象主義影響較為深刻,其詩儘量排除情感,以意象的堆砌來表達訊息,突顯出較為理智的態度;在內容方面,則偏重描寫現代都市的外面風景,並間接表達對現代的看法。第二個面向為李箱和吳章煥:他們分別受到達達主義和象徵主義影響,對現代的屬性和本質,進行更深層及內面性的探索,共同呈現負面的現代認識。第三個面向,以鄭芝溶和白石為代表:他們透過韓國民族的情感和前現代農村共同體的美好記憶,來尋找能夠擺脫現代不安和自我分裂危機的方法。
The Modernist literature in Korea in the 1930s reflects social changes caused by capitalist development on one hand, and it gives diversified literary responses to the experience of colonial rule on the other hand. In particular, the key difference from the literature in the past lies in the capture of modern feeling by experimenting with different techniques and styles to achieve brand-new aesthetic effects. In other words, iterary responses made to colonial capitalism via the acceptance and production of Western Modernism have the characteristics of aesthetic modernity. From the perspective of the influence of Western Modernist literature, the modern recognition of contemporary colonial capitalism, and the transformation of Korea, this study performs an analysis on three dimensions of Modernist literature in the 1930s by discussing the poetic works of six poets. To begin with, this study discusses the poems written by the earlier poets, Kim Ki-Rim and Kim Kwang-Gyun. Regardless of slight differences in writing styles, technically they are deeply influenced by imagism, a movement of Modernism in Britain and the United States. In their poems, emotions are seldom seen, and messages are delivered by means of numerous images, to present a more rational style. In terms of the content, they prefer to depict the scenery of urban areas, and indirectly express their viewpoints in modern times. Secondly, Yi Sang and O Chang-Hwan are influenced by Dadaism and symbolism, respectively. They carry out a deeper and more internal exploration of properties and the nature of modern times, and finally obtain a negative understanding of modernity in common. Thirdly, Chong Chi-Yong and Paek Sok attempt to figure out solutions to modern unrest and the risk of self-splitting by means of the national sentiment of being Koreans and pleasant memories of pre-modern rural communities.
期刊論文
1.金奉烈(1976)。李箱論─不安意識的究極。韓國言語文學,14。  延伸查詢new window
2.文光暎(1984)。李箱詩的性格學分析研究。論文集,18。  延伸查詢new window
3.申凡淳(1990)。李箱文學的分裂症慾望和寓話。國語國文學,103。  延伸查詢new window
4.金允靜(2008)。吳章煥文學的「象徵主義」美學研究。韓民族語文學,52,305-332。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.申慶得(1973)。李箱文學的心理主義研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.柄谷行人、趙京華(2006)。日本現代文學的起源。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
2.金容稷(1996)。韓國現代詩史。韓國現代詩史。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
3.高奉俊(2007)。現代性的異面。現代性的異面。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
4.金起林(1988)。現代主義的歷史位置。金起林全集。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
5.金裕中(2006)。韓國現代主義文學及其周邊。韓國現代主義文學及其周邊。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
6.柳晟浩(2006)。殖民地時代韓國詩的近代性。韓國文學的近代與近代性。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
7.金裕中(1996)。韓國現代主義文學的世界觀與歷史意識。韓國現代主義文學的世界觀與歷史意識。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
8.金光均(2006)。雪夜。韓國現代名詩選讀。北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.金光均(1985)。30年代畫家與詩人們。臥牛山。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
10.金允植(1988)。李箱小說研究。李箱小說研究。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
11.崔惠實(1994)。李箱文學的現代性。韓國現代小說的理論。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
12.金鐘垠(1975)。李箱的精神世界。心像。  延伸查詢new window
13.李奎東(1985)。精神分析學看李箱。精神分析學看李箱。  延伸查詢new window
14.李箱(2006)。鏡子。韓國現代名詩選讀。北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.白文任(1998)。李箱的現代主義方法論考察。1930年代後期文學的近代性和自我省察。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
16.鄭芝溶(2006)。鄉愁。韓國現代名詩選讀。北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.金慎靜(1998)。詩語的革新和現代詩的意義。1930年代後期文學的近代性和自我省察。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
18.李南周(2009)。二重課題論。二重課題論。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.金起林(1935)。知識分子的將來。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE