資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.58.160.117)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Persistence of Innovation in Taiwan's Manufacturing Firms
書刊名:
經濟論文叢刊
作者:
黃珈卉
/
楊志海
作者(外文):
Huang, Chia-hui
/
Yang, Chih-hai
出版日期:
2010
卷期:
38:2
頁次:
頁199-231
主題關鍵詞:
創新
;
持續性
;
狀態相依
;
Dynamic probit model
;
Innovation
;
Persistence
;
State dependence
;
Dynamic probit model
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(
1
)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:24
本研究的目的在於利用台灣證券交易所掛牌上市的製造業公司在1990至2003年的追蹤資料,以動態觀點來實證檢驗廠商創新持續性及廠商創新活動的決定因素。利用dynamic random effect probit model,控制個別廠商無法觀察之異質性及解決初始條件問題後,實證結果證實台灣製造業廠商存在創新持續的現象。再者,進一步將樣本區分成高技術機會群與低技術機會群兩群,分別檢驗不同技術機會環境下的廠商創新行爲是否持續。結果顯示,不論是否爲科學性產業的創新行爲皆存在創新持續的現象。而此效果尤以科學性產業較爲明顯。本文亦強調影響廠商創新績效的重要因素,此皆爲有助於瞭解廠商創新活動的決定因素。
以文找文
This study examines the persistence of innovation and the determinants of innovations in Taiwan's manufacturing sector, using a panel dataset of manufacturing firms over the period 1990-2003. This study employs a new estimation method for the dynamic random effect probit model to account for firm heterogeneity and also to handle the problem of initial conditions. The empirical results find a strong effect of state dependence after controlling for firm heterogeneity and the initial condition, supporting the hypothesis of true persistent innovation. This finding is also supported for subgroups of scientific and non-scientific industries, implying that the causal effect from past innovation to current innovation exists across industries. Less surprisingly, the phenomenon of innovation persistence is stronger in scientific industries relative to non-scientific industries. We also highlight some important factors that affect continuity in the performance of innovations.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Aghion, Philippe、Howitt, Peter(1992)。A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction。Econometrica,60(2),323-351。
2.
Acs, Zolt J.、Audretsch, David B.(1991)。Innovation and size at the firm level。Southern Economic Journal,57(3),739-744。
3.
Cohen, W. M.、Klepper, S.(1996)。Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D。Review of Economics and Statistics,78,232-243。
4.
Himmelberg, Charles P.、Petersen, Bruce C.(1994)。R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries。The Review of Economics and Statistics,76(1),38-51。
5.
Cohen, Wesley M.、Levinthal, Daniel A.(1989)。Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D。The Economic Journal,99(397),569-596。
6.
Arora, A., Ceccagnoli, M., and Cohen,W. M.(2008)。“R&D and the patentpremium”。International Journal of Industrial Organization,26,1153–1179。
7.
Bean, C. R.(1990)。“Endogenous growth and procyclical behaviour of productivity”。European Economic Review,34,355–363。
8.
Cefis, E.(2003)。“Is there persistence in innovative activities?”。InternationalJournal of Industrial Organization,21,489–515。
9.
Cefis, E. and Orsenigo, L.(2001)。“The persistence of innovative activities:A cross–country and cross–sectors comparative analysis”。Research Policy,30,1139–1158。
10.
Crepon, B. and Duguet, E.(1997)。“Estimation the innovation functionfrom patent numbers: GMM on count panel data”。Journal of Applies Econometrics,12,243–263。
11.
Geroski, P. A., Reenen, J. Van, andWalters, C. F.(1997)。“How persistentlydo firms innovate?”。Research Policy,26,33–48。
12.
Hall, B. H.、Ziedonis, R. H.(2001)。The patent paradox revisited: Anempirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995。RAND Journal of Economics,32,101-128。
13.
Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., and Griliches, Z.(1984)。“Econometric modelsfor count data with an application of the patents–R&D relationship”。Econometrica,52,909–938。
14.
Honore, B. and Kyriazidou, E.(2000)。“Panel data discrete choice modelswith lagged dependent variables”。Econometrica,68,839–874。
15.
Jang, S. L., Tsai, Y. T., and Chen, J.(2007)。“Persistent innovation: A crosscountrystudy of output and diversity over time”。Applied Economics Letters,15,323–326。
16.
Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L.(1993)。“Technological regimes and firm behaviour”。Industrial Corporate Change,2,45–71。
17.
Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L.(1999)。“Technological entry, exit and survival: An empirical analysisof patent data”。Research Policy,28,643–660。
18.
Palmberg, C.(2004)。“The sources of innovations – looking beyond technologicalopportunities”。Economics of Innovation and New Technology,13(2),183–197。
19.
Peters, B.(2009)。“Persistence of innovation: Stylised facts and panel dataevidence”。Journal of Technology Transfer,34,226–243。
20.
Saint-Paul, G.(1993)。“Productivity growth and the structure of the businesscycle”。European Economic Review,37,861–890。
21.
Sakakibara, M. and Branstetter, L. G.(2001)。“Do stronger patents inducemore innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reform”。RAND Journal of Economics,32,77–100。
22.
Trajtenberg, M.(2001)。“Innovation in Israel, 1968–1997: A comparativeanalysis using patent data”。Research Policy,30,363–389。
23.
Wooldridge, J.(2005)。“Simple solutions to the initial conditions problemin dynamic nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity”。Journal of Applied Econometrics,20,39–54。
24.
Yang, C. H.(2006)。“Is innovation the story of Taiwan’s economic growth?”。Journal of Asian Economics,17,867–878。
25.
Yang, C. H. and Chen, J. R.(2001)。“R&D, technology imports andpatents–GMM on count panel data”。Taiwan Economic Review,29,69–87。
26.
Zachariadis, M.(2003)。“R&D, innovation, and technological progress: Atest of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects”。Canadian Journal of Economics,36,566–586。
研究報告
1.
Cabagnols, A.(2006)。“Technological learning and the persistence of innovation:A France-UK comparison based on a Cox model of duration”。
2.
Cabagnols, A. C. Gay and Bas, C. L.(1999)。“How persistently do firmsinnovate? An evolutionary view”。
3.
Hall, B. H.(2002)。“The financing of research and development”。
4.
Raymond, W., Mohnen, P., Palm, F., and Schim van der Loeff, S.(2006)。“Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious?”。
圖書
1.
Mansfield, E.(1968)。Industrial Research and Technological Innovation: An Econometric Analysis。New York, NY:Norton。
2.
Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1982)。An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。
3.
Duflos, G.(2006)。“Persistence of innovation, technological change andquality-adjusted patents in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry”。
4.
Duguet, E. and Monjon, S.(2004)。“Is innovation persistent at the firmlevel? An econometric examination comparing the propensity score andregression methods”。Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiquesv 04075。Paris。
5.
Manez-Castillejo J. A. Rochina-Barrachina M. E. Sanchis-Llopis A. and Sanchis–Llopis J. A.(2006)。“Why do some firms persistently perform R&D activities?”。
6.
Sutton, J.(1991)。Sunk Costs and Market Structure-Price Competition, Advertisingand Evolution and Concentration。Cambridg。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
1.
提升廠商研發能量--政府研發支持政策的分析
2.
提升廠商研發能量--政府研發支持政策的分析
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code