:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Persistence of Innovation in Taiwan's Manufacturing Firms
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:黃珈卉 引用關係楊志海 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chia-huiYang, Chih-hai
出版日期:2010
卷期:38:2
頁次:頁199-231
主題關鍵詞:創新持續性狀態相依Dynamic probit modelInnovationPersistenceState dependenceDynamic probit model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
本研究的目的在於利用台灣證券交易所掛牌上市的製造業公司在1990至2003年的追蹤資料,以動態觀點來實證檢驗廠商創新持續性及廠商創新活動的決定因素。利用dynamic random effect probit model,控制個別廠商無法觀察之異質性及解決初始條件問題後,實證結果證實台灣製造業廠商存在創新持續的現象。再者,進一步將樣本區分成高技術機會群與低技術機會群兩群,分別檢驗不同技術機會環境下的廠商創新行爲是否持續。結果顯示,不論是否爲科學性產業的創新行爲皆存在創新持續的現象。而此效果尤以科學性產業較爲明顯。本文亦強調影響廠商創新績效的重要因素,此皆爲有助於瞭解廠商創新活動的決定因素。
This study examines the persistence of innovation and the determinants of innovations in Taiwan's manufacturing sector, using a panel dataset of manufacturing firms over the period 1990-2003. This study employs a new estimation method for the dynamic random effect probit model to account for firm heterogeneity and also to handle the problem of initial conditions. The empirical results find a strong effect of state dependence after controlling for firm heterogeneity and the initial condition, supporting the hypothesis of true persistent innovation. This finding is also supported for subgroups of scientific and non-scientific industries, implying that the causal effect from past innovation to current innovation exists across industries. Less surprisingly, the phenomenon of innovation persistence is stronger in scientific industries relative to non-scientific industries. We also highlight some important factors that affect continuity in the performance of innovations.
期刊論文
1.Aghion, Philippe、Howitt, Peter(1992)。A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction。Econometrica,60(2),323-351。  new window
2.Acs, Zolt J.、Audretsch, David B.(1991)。Innovation and size at the firm level。Southern Economic Journal,57(3),739-744。  new window
3.Cohen, W. M.、Klepper, S.(1996)。Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D。Review of Economics and Statistics,78,232-243。  new window
4.Himmelberg, Charles P.、Petersen, Bruce C.(1994)。R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries。The Review of Economics and Statistics,76(1),38-51。  new window
5.Cohen, Wesley M.、Levinthal, Daniel A.(1989)。Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D。The Economic Journal,99(397),569-596。  new window
6.Arora, A., Ceccagnoli, M., and Cohen,W. M.(2008)。“R&D and the patentpremium”。International Journal of Industrial Organization,26,1153–1179。  new window
7.Bean, C. R.(1990)。“Endogenous growth and procyclical behaviour of productivity”。European Economic Review,34,355–363。  new window
8.Cefis, E.(2003)。“Is there persistence in innovative activities?”。InternationalJournal of Industrial Organization,21,489–515。  new window
9.Cefis, E. and Orsenigo, L.(2001)。“The persistence of innovative activities:A cross–country and cross–sectors comparative analysis”。Research Policy,30,1139–1158。  new window
10.Crepon, B. and Duguet, E.(1997)。“Estimation the innovation functionfrom patent numbers: GMM on count panel data”。Journal of Applies Econometrics,12,243–263。  new window
11.Geroski, P. A., Reenen, J. Van, andWalters, C. F.(1997)。“How persistentlydo firms innovate?”。Research Policy,26,33–48。  new window
12.Hall, B. H.、Ziedonis, R. H.(2001)。The patent paradox revisited: Anempirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995。RAND Journal of Economics,32,101-128。  new window
13.Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., and Griliches, Z.(1984)。“Econometric modelsfor count data with an application of the patents–R&D relationship”。Econometrica,52,909–938。  new window
14.Honore, B. and Kyriazidou, E.(2000)。“Panel data discrete choice modelswith lagged dependent variables”。Econometrica,68,839–874。  new window
15.Jang, S. L., Tsai, Y. T., and Chen, J.(2007)。“Persistent innovation: A crosscountrystudy of output and diversity over time”。Applied Economics Letters,15,323–326。  new window
16.Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L.(1993)。“Technological regimes and firm behaviour”。Industrial Corporate Change,2,45–71。  new window
17.Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L.(1999)。“Technological entry, exit and survival: An empirical analysisof patent data”。Research Policy,28,643–660。  new window
18.Palmberg, C.(2004)。“The sources of innovations – looking beyond technologicalopportunities”。Economics of Innovation and New Technology,13(2),183–197。  new window
19.Peters, B.(2009)。“Persistence of innovation: Stylised facts and panel dataevidence”。Journal of Technology Transfer,34,226–243。  new window
20.Saint-Paul, G.(1993)。“Productivity growth and the structure of the businesscycle”。European Economic Review,37,861–890。  new window
21.Sakakibara, M. and Branstetter, L. G.(2001)。“Do stronger patents inducemore innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reform”。RAND Journal of Economics,32,77–100。  new window
22.Trajtenberg, M.(2001)。“Innovation in Israel, 1968–1997: A comparativeanalysis using patent data”。Research Policy,30,363–389。  new window
23.Wooldridge, J.(2005)。“Simple solutions to the initial conditions problemin dynamic nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity”。Journal of Applied Econometrics,20,39–54。  new window
24.Yang, C. H.(2006)。“Is innovation the story of Taiwan’s economic growth?”。Journal of Asian Economics,17,867–878。  new window
25.Yang, C. H. and Chen, J. R.(2001)。“R&D, technology imports andpatents–GMM on count panel data”。Taiwan Economic Review,29,69–87。  new window
26.Zachariadis, M.(2003)。“R&D, innovation, and technological progress: Atest of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects”。Canadian Journal of Economics,36,566–586。  new window
研究報告
1.Cabagnols, A.(2006)。“Technological learning and the persistence of innovation:A France-UK comparison based on a Cox model of duration”。  new window
2.Cabagnols, A. C. Gay and Bas, C. L.(1999)。“How persistently do firmsinnovate? An evolutionary view”。  new window
3.Hall, B. H.(2002)。“The financing of research and development”。  new window
4.Raymond, W., Mohnen, P., Palm, F., and Schim van der Loeff, S.(2006)。“Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious?”。  new window
圖書
1.Mansfield, E.(1968)。Industrial Research and Technological Innovation: An Econometric Analysis。New York, NY:Norton。  new window
2.Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1982)。An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Duflos, G.(2006)。“Persistence of innovation, technological change andquality-adjusted patents in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry”。  new window
4.Duguet, E. and Monjon, S.(2004)。“Is innovation persistent at the firmlevel? An econometric examination comparing the propensity score andregression methods”。Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiquesv 04075。Paris。  new window
5.Manez-Castillejo J. A. Rochina-Barrachina M. E. Sanchis-Llopis A. and Sanchis–Llopis J. A.(2006)。“Why do some firms persistently perform R&D activities?”。  new window
6.Sutton, J.(1991)。Sunk Costs and Market Structure-Price Competition, Advertisingand Evolution and Concentration。Cambridg。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE