高一學生多變因因果推理與論證能力之相關研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	高一學生多變因因果推理與論證能力之相關研究
書刊名：	教育實踐與研究
作者：	林志能／陳玲君／洪振方
作者(外文)：	Lin, Chih-neng／Chen, Ling-jiun／Hung, Jeng-fung
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	23:2
頁次：	頁1-35
主題關鍵詞：	多變因；因果推理能力；論證能力；Multiple variables；Causal reasoning ability；Argumentation ability
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:32

本研究旨在瞭解高一學生對多變因之因果推理與論證能力的表現，以及兩者之關係。研究方法採用問卷調查方式，研究對象為公立學校高中一年級學生共165 人，學生的基測入學錄取PR 值介於87-99 之間。研究使用「因果推理與論證能力問卷」作為研究工具，此工具經科教專家審查，內容包含藥物成效、動物趨性、噴撒殺蟲劑和地震預測等科學情境，讓學生以寫作方式呈現自己的因果推理與論證的思考，問卷經由三位評分者分別進行評分，整體問卷的Hoyt信度值為.992。研究結果顯示，學生在多變因之因果推理方面，「因素尋找」能力比「理由陳述」能力的表現好。在論證方面，學生在「證據與理由」、「反駁」能力比「提出宣稱」能力的表現差。因果推理能力與論證能力兩者間具有高度相關（r =.782, p <.05），且因果推理能力表現較佳的學生在論證能力上的表現也較好（p <.05）。

以文找文

This study aimed to understand the relationship between multivariable causal reasoning ability and argumentation ability of the 10th grade students. The research method of this study was questionnaire survey. “The ability of causal reasoning and argumentation questionnaire” was used to detect students’ multivariable causal reasoning ability and argumentation ability. There were 165 subjects who participated in this survey. Data analysis showed that: (1) In the aspect of multivariable causal reasoning, students’ performance in factor-search was better than reason-state. (2) In the aspect of argumentation, students’ performance in rebuttal was weaker than other factors. (3) Multivariable causal reasoning performance and argumentation performance demonstrate a high correlation (r=.782, p <.05).

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Lawson, A. E.(1982)。The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，19，743-760。
2.	Kelly, G. J.、Bazerman, C.(2003)。How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis。Applied Linguistics，24(1)，28-55。
3.	Zohar, A.、Nemet, F.(2002)。Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，39(1)，35-62。
4.	Wilson, C. D.、Taylor, J. A.、Kowalski, S. M.、Carlson, J.(2010)。The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，47(3)，276-301。
5.	Jonassen, D. H.,、Ionas, I. G.(2008)。Designing effective supports for causal reasoning。Educational Technology Research & Development，56，287-308。
6.	Hogan, K.、Maglienti, M.(2001)。Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，38，663-687。
7.	Lawson, Anton E.(1978)。The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning。Journal of research in Science Teaching，15(1)，11-24。
8.	Verheij, B.(2005)。Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme。Argumentation，19，347-371。
9.	Nussbaum, E. M.、Sinatra, G. M.、Poliquin, A.(2008)。Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning。International Journal of Science Education，30(15)，1977-1999。
10.	Kelly, G. J.、Takao, A.(2002)。Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing。Science Education，86(3)，314-342。
11.	Kuhn, D.(1993)。Science as argument: Implication for teaching and learning scientific thinking。Science Education，77(3)，319-317。
12.	Erduran, S.、Simon, S.、Osborne, J.(2004)。Tapping into argumentation: Development in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse。Science Education，88，915-933。
13.	Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2006)。Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom。International Journal of Science Education，28(2/3)，235-260。
14.	Zimmerman, C.(2000)。The development of scientific reasoning skills。Developmental Review，20(1)，99-149。
15.	Kuhn, D.(2007)。Reasoning about multiple variables: Control of variables is not the only challenge。Science Education，91(5)，710-716。
16.	Sandoval, W. A.、Millwood, K. A.(2005)。The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations。Cognition and Instruction，23(1)，23-55。
17.	Hung, W.、Jonassen, D. H.(2006)。Conceptual understanding of causal reasoning in physics。International Journal of Science Education，28(13)，1601-1621。
18.	Kuhn, D.、Katz, J. B.、Dean, D.(2004)。Developing reason。Thinking and Reasoning，10，197-219。
19.	Schauble, L.(1996)。The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts。Developmental Psychology，32(1)，102-119。
20.	Sampson, V.、Clark, D. B.(2008)。Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions。Science Education，92(3)，447-472。
21.	林志能、洪振方(20080900)。論證模式分析及其評量要素。科學教育，312，2-18。延伸查詢
22.	Duschl, R. A.、Osborne, J.(2002)。Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education。Studies in Science Education，38(1)，39-72。
23.	Lawson, A. E.(2003)。The nature and development of hypothetico‐predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching。International Journal of Science Education，25(11)，1387-1408。
24.	Brem, S. K.,、Rips, L. J.(2000)。Explanation and evidence in informal argument。Cognitive Science，24(4)，573-604。
25.	Kuhn, D.,、Udell, W.(2007)。Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument。Thinking and Reasoning，13，90-104。
26.	Nussbaum, E. M.(2002)。Scaffolding argumentation in the social studies classroom。Social Studies，93(3)，79-84。
27.	Osborne, J., Erduran, S.,、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。
28.	Schunn, C. D.,、Anderson, J. R.(1999)。The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning。Cognitive Science，23，337-370。
29.	Wu, Y. T.,、Tsai, C. C.(2007)。High school students’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses。International Journal of Science Education，29，1163-1187。
30.	Schunn, C. D.、Anderson, J. R.(1999)。The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning。Cognitive Science，23，337-370。
31.	Brem, S. K.、Rips, L. J.(2000)。Explanation and evidence in informal argument。Cognitive Science，24(4)，573-604。
32.	Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。
33.	Kuhn, D.、Udell, W.(2007)。Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument。Thinking and Reasoning，13，90-104。
34.	Nussbaum, E. M.(2002)。Scaffolding argumentation in the social studies classroom。Social Studies，93(3)，79-84。
35.	Wu, Y. T.、Tsai, C. C.(2007)。High school students' informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses。International Journal of Science Education，29，1163-1187。

會議論文
1.	McNeill, K. L.,、Krajcik, J.(2007)。Middle school students’ use of appropriate andinappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations。New York, NJ。233-265。

圖書
1.	Kuhn, D.(2005)。Education for Thinking。London：Harvard University Press。
2.	Klahr, D.(2000)。Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。
3.	van Eemeren, Frans、Grootendorst, Rob、Henkemans, Francisca Snoeck(2002)。Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
4.	Zohar, A.(2004)。Higher order thinking in science classrooms:Students’ learning and teachers’ professional development。Dordrecht, Netherlands：Kluwer。
5.	Koslowski, B.(1996)。Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。
6.	Yaremko, R. M.、Harari, H.、Harrison, R. C.、Lynn, E.(1986)。Handbook of research and quantitative methods in psychology for students and professionals。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。
7.	Duschl, R. A.、Schweingruber, H. A.、Shouse, A. W.(2007)。Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8。Washington, DC：National Academy of Sciences。
8.	Newell, Allen、Simon, Herbert Alexander(1972)。Human Problem Solving。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
9.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2004)。Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003。Paris：Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。
10.	教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要，自然與生活科技學習領域。台北：教育部。延伸查詢
11.	Toulmin, Stephen E.(1958)。The Use of Argument。Cambridge University Press。
12.	Sternberg, Robert J.、李玉琇、蔣文祁(2005)。認知心理學。臺北：雙葉書廊有限公司。延伸查詢
13.	Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
14.	教育部(2010)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。延伸查詢
15.	National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。
16.	American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。
17.	Aleixandre, M. P.,、Erduran, S.(2008)。Argumentation in science education: An overview。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。
18.	Bell, P.(2004)。Promoting students’ argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom。Internet environments for science education。Mahwah, NJ。
19.	Duschl, R. A.(2008)。Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroombased research。New York。
20.	Duschl, R. A.,、Grandy, R. E.(2008)。Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates。Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation。The Netherlands。
21.	Erduran, S.(2008)。Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。
22.	Garcia-Mila, M.,、Andersen, C.(2008)。Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。
23.	Hogan, K.,、Fisherkeller, J. E.(2000)。Dialogue as data: Assessing students’ scientific reasoning with interactive protocols。Assessing science understanding。London。
24.	Kuhn, D.(2002)。What is scientific reasoning and and how does it develop。Handbook of childhood cognitive development。Oxford, UK。
25.	Kuhn, D.,、Franklin, S.(2006)。The second decade: What develops (and how)? In W。andbook of child psychology: Vol. II. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.)。Hoboken, NJ。
26.	Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006)。PISA 2006: PISA released items-science。Paris。
27.	Duschl, R. A.、Schweingruber, H.、Shouse, A.(2007)。Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8。Washington, DC。
28.	Aleixandre, M. P.、Erduran, S.(2008)。Argumentation in science education: An overview。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。
29.	Bell, P.(2004)。Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom。Internet environments for science education。Mahwah, NJ。
30.	Duschl, R. A.(2008)。Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。
31.	Duschl, R. A.、Grandy, R. E.(2008)。Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates。Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation。The Netherlands。
32.	Erduran, S.(2008)。Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。
33.	Garcia-Mila, M.、Andersen, C.(2008)。Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。
34.	Hogan, K.、Fisherkeller, J. E.(2000)。Dialogue as data: Assessing students' scientific reasoning with interactive protocols。Assessing science understanding。London。
35.	Kuhn, D.(2002)。What is scientific reasoning and and how does it develop。Handbook of childhood cognitive development。Oxford, UK。
36.	Kuhn, D.、Franklin, S.(2006)。The second decade: What develops (and how)?。Handbook of child psychology: Vol. II. Cognition, perception, and language。Hoboken, NJ。
37.	McNeill, K. L.、Krajcik, J.(2007)。Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations。Thinking with data: The proceedings of 33rd Carnegie symposium on cognition。New York, NJ。

其他
1.	Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006)。PISA 2006: PISA released items-science，Paris。
2.	Zimmerman, C.(2005)。The development of scientific reasoning skills: What psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science learning，http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Corinne_Zimmerman_Final_Paper.pdf， 20101015。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	科學探究與實作課程的發展、實施與評量：以實驗室中的科學論證為核心之研究

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫