:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Changing the Relative Weights of Tw-DRGs by Applying MS-DRG Major Complications and Comorbidity Standards
書刊名:醫務管理期刊
作者:楊美雪 引用關係吳蕙玲錢慶文吳聰慧
作者(外文):Yang, Mei-hsuehWu, Hui-lingChien, Ching-wenWu, Tsong-huey
出版日期:2010
卷期:11:3
頁次:頁43-58
主題關鍵詞:住院診斷關聯群病例組合指標主要併發症/合併症Taiwan diagnosis related groupsCase mix indexMajor complication and comorbidity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:33
目的:以住院病患疾病嚴重度調整醫療支付以降低醫院之財務風險與病患就醫可近性及公平性之議題受到同等重視。本研究旨在分析健保住院診斷關聯群依美國MS-DRGs所定義之主要併發症/合併症分類後,不同醫院特性病患之醫療費用與住院日的變異,俾便對疾病嚴重度的影響能有較為深入的認識。 方法:本研究為回溯性之2006年全民健保資料庫分析。研究樣本為依美國MS-DRGs所定義之主要併發症/合併症重新群分派後,Tw-DRGs案件中併有主要併發症/合併症之案件大於60%之群組,為Tw-DRG 12101、20201、41601與47501等四群,每群分別有2,294,19,411,28,576與33,178案件。比較各群有無主要併發症/合併症之案件的醫療費用,並分析群組醫療費用變異係數與醫院病例組合指標(CMI值)之改變量。 結果:有主要併發症/合併症之案件的平均醫療費用均顯著高於無主要併發症/合併症者的平均醫療費用。以公立醫學中心平均醫療費用(95,611.20點)最高,其次為財團法人醫學中心(89,338.56點),區域醫院與地區醫院。主要併發症/合併症分群後,醫學中心CMI值增加1.099%比區域醫院增加幅度多,但財團法人區域醫院則稍微減少(-0.02%),地區醫院CMI值減少與其醫療費用較低有對應。本研究結果顯示主要併發症/合併症分群之各群醫療費用變異係數有減少。 結論:結果發現主要併發症/合併症能反應不同醫院之同群DRG醫療費用之變異,若推論至本研究四群Tw-DRGs外之其他DRGs則須謹慎。
Objectives: Adjusting the severity of illness (SOI) for each inpatient service is important for reducing financial risks faced by different hospitals and for maintaining patients' accessibility to and equity in an inpatient payment system. In this study, we analyzed four Tw-DRGs (Taiwan version of Diagnosis-Related Groups) by applying the new Major Complications and Co-morbidity (MCC) standards in the new Medicare Severity-adjusted DRGs (MS-DRG). Variations in medical expenses and length of stay (LOS) among hospitals with different accreditation and ownership status were examined after employing more appropriate SOI standards. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the 2006 Taiwan NHI inpatient claim database. After re-grouping Tw-DRGs by MCC, it was found that four DRGs had MCC in over 60% of their claims. These included Tw-DRG 12101 (Circulatory disorders with acute myocardial infarction and major complications, discharged alive with Complications and Comorbidities (CC), 20201 (Cirrhosis and alcoholic hepatitis with CC), 41601 (Septicemia age≧18 with CC) and 47501 (Respiratory system diagnoses with ventilator support with CC) with 2,294, 19,411, 28,576 and 33,178 cases respectively. These four DRGs were selected for comparison of the differences in medical expenses for inpatients with MCC versus those without MCC. The coefficient of variation (CV) of medical expenses was applied to measure intra DRG homogeneity. The hospital case mix index (CMI) and medical expenses were also calculated and compared to examine changes in CMI across hospitals. Results: Public medical centers had the highest average expense per discharge (relative value unit 95,611.20), followed by non-profit medical centers (89,338.56), regional hospitals and district hospitals. The CMI for public medical centers under the Tw-DRGs incorporating the MCCs standards increased by 1.099% more than did the CMI for regional hospitals; however, the CMI for non-profit regional hospitals decreased slightly by -0.02%. CMI reduction corresponded with lower expenses for district hospitals. MCC-split DRGs had a lower CV with respect to medical expenses. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated that MCCs accounted for variations in medical expenses for patients in the same DRG across different hospitals. Our findings were limited to four Tw-DRGs and should be interpreted cautiously.
其他
1.DA Forgion, TE Vermeer, K Suryackar, JA Wrieden, CA Plante(2004)。The Impact of ORG-based payment system on quality of health care in OECD。  new window
2.WW Young(197910)。Measuring the cost of care using generalized patient management paths。  new window
3.MD Rcisko, CE Carpenter(1994)。The impact of intra-ORG severity of illness on hospital profitability: implications for payment reform。  new window
4.JP Newhouse(1996)。Reimbursing health plan and health providers: efficiency in production versus selection。  new window
5.RP Ellis(l998)。Creaming. Skimping and dumping: provider competition on the intensive and extensive margins。  new window
6.E Campbell, M Ahern(l993)。Have procompetition changes altered hospital provision of indigent care。  new window
7.M Schlesinger, R Dorwat, C Hoover, S Epstein(l997)。The determinants of dumping: a national study of economically motivated transfers involving mental health care。  new window
8.WJ Lynk(2001)。One DRG, one price? The effect of patient condition on price variation within DRGs and across hospitals。  new window
9.SD Horn, PD Sharkey, AF Chambers(1985)。Seventy of illness within DRGs: impact on prospective payment。  new window
10.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)(200701)。HHS Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule, and other Part B payment policies for CY 2008; revisions to the payment policies of ambulance services under the ambulance fee schedule for CY 2008; and the amendme。  new window
11.C D’ Amato, G Garrett, LM Johnson(2007)。The final rule for FY 2008 IPPS. MS-DRGs and POA top list in a year of major change。  new window
12.R Leary, D Faney(2007)。Surviving Medicare’s IPPS changes: what you need to know。  new window
13.Burcau of National Health Insurance(20080330)。Taiwan Diagnosis Related Groups, Tw-DRGs Principles of Tw-DRGs。  new window
14.WM Chen, SC Wu(2005)。Simulating the financial impact of DRGs on hospitals in Taiwan。  new window
15.MS Yang, LM Tsai, YY Lee, CP Fan, MJ Hsieh(2007)。Applying decision tree in the analysis on the financial impact of the third Taiwan DRGs (Tw-DRGs)- A case study of DRO 12701 Heart failure and shock with CC。  new window
16.Bureau of National health Insurance(20080330)。Taiwan Diagnosis Related Groups, Tw-DRGs payment reports。  new window
17.RL Mullin(2003)。The evolution of DRGs。  new window
18.Averill, RF, JH Muldoon, JC Vertrees et al(20080707)。The Evolution of Casemix Measurement Using Diagnosis Related Groups, 3M HIS Research Report 5-98。  new window
19.Y Shen(2003)。Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to Measure Inpatient Severity in the VA。  new window
20.T Wolters(200812l6)。CMS proposes major DRG revisions。  new window
21.H Bush(2008)。How hospitals can prepare for the new MS-DRGs。  new window
22.YS Liou(1998)。The Influence of Case Payment System of NHI on the Medical Services-Prostatectomy Unpublished Dissertation。  new window
23.LH Chang, SH Cheng, MC Yang, TL Chiang(2004)。Hospital Ownership and Medical Service Pricing。  new window
24.CS Chen, TC Liu, WT Chiu, HC Lin(2007)。Impact of hospital and physician characteristics on medical expenditures for acute myocardial infarction hospitalization。  new window
25.O Montagne, C Chaix, A Harf, A Castaigne, I Durand-Zaleski(2000)。Costs for acute myocardial infarction in a tertiary care centre and nationwide in France。  new window
26.BK Richburg(2008)。5 nuances of Medicare billing。  new window
27.J Lubell(2008)。How severe? Hospitals adjust to life with MS-DRGs, but impact on bottom line still unclear。  new window
28.G Palmer, B Reid(2001)。Evaluation of the performance of diagnosis-related groups and similar case mix systems: methodological issue。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE