臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Acquiring Double Object Verbs in Mandarin Chinese
書刊名：華語文教學研究
作者：林馥蘋／陳純音 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Angela Fu-pin／Chen, Doris Chun-yin
出版日期：2010
卷期：7:3
頁次：頁109-146
主題關鍵詞：雙賓動詞結構；母語習得；標誌性；華語；Double object construction；L1 acquisition；Markedness；Chinese
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:130
本研究旨在探討以華語爲母語的學齡前兒童雙賓動詞的母語習得。華語雙賓動詞可細分爲三類：必加「給」的動詞、不能加「給」動詞、以及可隨意加「給」動詞。主要的研究議題包含以下五種：各類動詞的困難度、句型的標記性、非雙賓句型之句子分析。本研究共設計兩個測驗：句子選擇以及引導造句。研究對象爲45位學齡前兒童及15位大學生。受試兒童再分爲三組：第組（三歲）、第二組（四歲）、和第三組（約五歲）。研究結果顯示：第一不能加「給」的動詞對學童困難度最高，而另外兩類動詞困難度差異不大。第二，必加「給」的動詞中、[V-gei-IO-DO]比[V-DO-gei-IO]更具有標記性。對於可隨意力「給」的動詞而言，[V-gei-IO-DO]最具有標記性，[V-IO-DO]居於第二，而[V-DO-gei-IO]最無標記性。第三，從學童的非雙賓動詞句型使用分析得知，他們傾向於先把這些動詞當作一般及物動詞使用，接著加入第二個賓語，最後他們說出越來越多的複雜句子。
The present study aims to investigate Chinese children's acquisition of double object verbs with gei. These verbs were classified into three types, gei-required, gei-forbidden, and gei-optional. The following issues were examined, i.e. the difficulty levels, unmarked/marked patterns, and development of untargeted patterns. Two tasks were employed, a grammaticality task and a sentence elicitation task. Forty-five children aged from three to five and fifteen adults participated in the experiment, who were further divided into four groups. i.e. Group 1 (three-year-olds), Group 2 (four-year-olds), Group 3 (five-year-olds), and Group 4 (native controls). The results are as follows: First, among the three types, gei-forbidden verbs posed the most difficulty for the children, while the other two were relatively easier. Second, with regard to gei-required verbs, [V-DO-gei-IO] was the unmarked pattern while [V-gei-IO-DO] was marked. Similarly, for gei-optional verbs, the most unmarked pattern was [V-DO-gei-IO], followed by [V-IO-DO], and [V-gei-IO-DO] the most marked. Third, a steady development was found in the children's untargeted sentences. The children began with mono-transitive use of these verbs, then added a second object, and finally generated more complex sentences.
期刊論文
1.Her, One-Soon(2006)。Justifying part-of-speech assignments for Mandarin gei。Lingua，116(8)，1274-1302。  new window
2.Huang, Chu-Ren、Ahrens, Kathleen(1999)。The function and category of gei in Mandarin ditransitive constructions。Journal of Chinese Linguistics，27(2)，1-26。  new window
3.Eckman, Fred R.(1977)。Markedness and The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis。Language Learning，27(2)，315-330。  new window
4.Campbell, A. L. and Tomasello, M.(2001)。The acquisition of English dative constructions。Applied Psycholinguistics，22，253-267。  new window
5.Cook, V.(1976)。A note on indirect objects。Journal of Child Language，3，435-437。  new window
6.Liu, D.(2001)。A Typological study on the double-object construction of Chinese gei verbs。Zhongguo Yuwen，5，387-397。  new window
7.Mazurkewich, I.(1984)。The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory。Language Learning，34，91-109。  new window
8.Nino, A.(1999)。Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity。Journal of Child Language，26，610-633。  new window
9.Osgood, C. E. and Zehler, A. M.(1981)。Acquisition of bi-transitive sentences: pre-linguistic determinants of language acquisition。Journal of Child Language，8，367-383。  new window
會議論文
1.Chung, T.-T. R. and Gordon, P.(1998)。The acquisition of Chinese dative constructionspp. 109-120。  new window
學位論文
1.Chang, Y.-L.(2005)。On gei in Mandarin Chinese and its implications for Universal Grammar。  new window
2.Yang, S.-Y.(1991)。“Dative alternation”” in Chinese and English。  new window
圖書
1.Levin, B.、Hovav, M. Rappaport(2004)。Argument Realization。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Clark, E. V.(1973)。What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language。Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language。New York：Academic Press。  new window
3.Pinker, Steven(1989)。Learnability and Cognition。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
4.Goldberg, Adele Eva(1995)。Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure。University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Goldberg, Adele E.(2006)。Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Bowerman, M.(1973)。Structural relationship in children’s utterances: Syntactic or semantic?。Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language。  new window
7.Clark, E. V.(1993)。The Lexicon in Acquisition。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Ervin-Tripp, S.(1973)。Some strategies for the first two years。Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language。  new window
9.Givón, T.(1984)。Direct object and dative shifting: Semantic vs. pragmatic case。Objects: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations。London。  new window
10.Givón, T.(2001)。Syntax。Amsterdam。  new window
11.Greenberg, J. H.(1966)。Language universals。Current Trends in Linguistics 3。The Netherlands。  new window
12.Limber, J.(1973)。Genesis of complex sentences。Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language。  new window
13.Moore, T. E.(1973)。Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language。New York。  new window
14.Tang, T.-C.(1979)。Double object constructions in Mandarin。Guoyu Yufa Yanjiu Junji [Studies in Chinese Syntax]。Taipei。  new window
圖書論文
1.Haegeman, Liliane(1997)。Elements of Grammar。Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：931（臺灣：919，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2413552 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68206362
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上