:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:幼兒表徵遊戲中文語言溝通之探究--以雙語班與半日全美班個案為例
書刊名:朝陽人文社會學刊
作者:廖宜筠梁珀華 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Yi-yunLiang, Poh-hwa
出版日期:2010
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁177-216
主題關鍵詞:中文語言溝通半日全美班社會戲劇遊戲表徵遊戲雙語班Bilingual classChinese language communicationHalf-day English classRepresentational playSociodramatic play
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:105
本研究之主要目的在探究接受不同英語教學方式之幼兒在進行表徵遊戲時的中文語言溝通情況。研究方式係以個案研究方式,以台中市某私立幼稚園雙語班及半日全美班之兩位幼兒為主要研究對象,並以質量並重之研究方法,採用教室自然情境觀察,並配合角落時間記錄表、教師與父母訪談等方式進行研究資料蒐集。 本研究之結果發現:雙語班妮妮在表徵遊戲的語言溝通表現上,與半日全美班菲菲之表現相似,兩位都屬於遊戲持續性極佳的幼兒,皆參與了大量的社會戲劇遊戲,並有豐富的中文語言溝通。此外,雙語班妮妮在表徵遊戲之語言溝通類型中,是以假裝溝通中的「符合其所扮演角色的溝通」次數最高,次數最少的則是後設溝通中的「表徵替代物的認定」;半日全美班菲菲在表徵遊戲之語言溝通類型中,也是以假裝溝通中的「符合其所扮演角色的溝通」次數較高,但是,次數最少的則是後設溝通中的「分配角色」。在語言溝通的特色部份,雙語班妮妮呈現出「善於表達」、「配合度高之語言互動」、「重視禮儀的語言溝通」,以及「勇於表達以捍衛自我權益」等四項特色;半美班菲菲則呈現出「語言豐富且創意十足」、「語朝氣專制且強勢」、「善於溝通且喜好發問」等三項特色。
The purposes of this study are to investigate how two children from two types of classes, bilingual and half-day English classes, communicated with peers in representational play. The researcher used qualitative and quantitative research methods to explore the types of communication they engaged and the characteristics of the communication in the play. The results of this study are stated as follows: (1) Nini and Fifi both liked to participate in representational play. They also exhibited persistence and rich verbal communication in play. (2) As to the types of verbal communication, Nini exhibited the most amount of "pretend communication statements are appropriate for the role that the child has adopted", and the least amount of "designating the make-believe identities of objects". Fifi also exhibited the most amount of "pretend communication statements are appropriate for the role that the child has adopted", however, the least amount of "assigning roles". (3) Nini, the one in bilingual class, exhibited four characteristics while playing, including: an expert of expressing thoughts, good communications with peers, showing respect while communicating with peers, and an exhibition of courage to defend self-rights and interests". Fifi, the one in half-day English class, exhibited three characteristics: creative and rich language expression, communication with authoritative tone, and make the best use of communications to satisfy curiosity.
期刊論文
1.毛連塭、湯梅英(19920600)。兒童學習英語之時機成效及相關研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,23,23-35。  延伸查詢new window
2.Podlozny, A.(2000)。Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: A clear link。The Journal of Aesthetic Education,34(3/4),239-275。  new window
3.Kardash, C. A. M.、Wright, L.(1987)。Does creative drama benefit elementary school students: A meta-analysis。Youth Theatre Journal,1(3),11-18。  new window
4.周慧菁(2004)。臺灣家長對英語究竟有多熱?。天下雜誌,311,116-121。  延伸查詢new window
5.Wright, C., Bacigalupa, C., Black. T.,、Burton, M.(2008)。Windows into children’s thinking: A guide to story telling and dramatization。Early Childhood Education,35 (4),363-369。  new window
6.Wolfgang, C.(1974)。An exploration of the relationship between the cognitive area of reading and selected development aspects of children’s play。Psychology in the Schools,11,338-343。  new window
7.Christie, J. F.(1985)。Training of symbolic play。Early Child Development and Care,19 (1-2),43-52。  new window
8.Friedman. O.,、Leslie, A. M.(2007)。The conceptual underpinnings of pretense: Pretending is not ‘behaving-as-if ’。Cognition,105,103-124。  new window
9.Garvey, C.(1974)。Some properties of social play。Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,20,63-180。  new window
10.Goodson, B.,、Greenfield, P.(1975)。The search for structural principles in children’s play。Child Development,39,734-746。  new window
11.Hughes, C.,、Dunn, J.(1997)。”Pretend you didn’t know”: Preschoolers’ talk about mental states in pretend play。Cognitive Development,12,477-499。  new window
12.Mages, W. K.(2008)。Does creative drama promote language development in early childhood? A review of the methods and measures employed in the empirical literature。Review of Educational Research,78 (1),124-152。  new window
13.McCuune-Nicolich, L.(1981)。Toward symbolic functioning: Structure of early pretend games and potential parallels with language。Child Development,52,785-797。  new window
14.Mueller, E.,、Brenner, J.(1977)。The origins of social skills and interaction among play group toddlers。Child Development,48,854-861。  new window
15.Pellegrini, A. D.(1980)。The relationship between kindergarteners’ play and achievement in prereading, language, and writing。Psychology in the Schools,17,530-535。  new window
16.Pellegrini, A.,、Golda, L.(1982)。The effects of the matically fantasy play training on the development of children’s story comprehension。American Educational Research Journal,19,443-452。  new window
17.Smith, P. K.、Syddall, S.(1978)。Play and non-play tutoring in preschool children: Is it play or tutoring which matters?。British Journal of Educational Psychology,48,315-325。  new window
18.Vitz, K.(1983)。A review of empirical research in drama and language。Children’s Theatre Review,32 (4),17-25。  new window
19.Taharally, L. C.(1991)。Fantasy play, language and cognitive ability of four-year-old children in Guyana, South America。Child Study Journal,21,37-71。  new window
20.Amaral, O. M.(2001)。Parents’ decisions about bilingual program models。Bilingual Research Journal,25 (1/2),215-237。  new window
21.Burner(1983)。Play, thought, and language。Peabody Journal of Education,60 (3),60-69。  new window
會議論文
1.許月貴(2001)。幼兒教育階段實施英語教學之探討。  延伸查詢new window
2.張鑑如、張湘君、顏宏如(2001)。臺灣幼兒英語教育之現況與問題-從幼兒家長的觀點談起。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃瑞琴(2001)。幼兒遊戲課程。台北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Frost, Joe L.、Wortham, Sue C.、Reifel, Stuart(2001)。Play and Child Development。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Johnson, J. E.、Christie, J. F.、Wardle, F.(2005)。Play, development and early education。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
4.蔡淑苓(2004)。遊戲理論與應用--以幼兒遊戲與幼兒教師教學為例。臺北市:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Johnson, James E.、Christie, James F.、Yawkey, Thomas D.(1999)。Play and early childhood development。New York:Longman。  new window
6.陳淑敏(1999)。幼兒遊戲。台北縣:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳幸玲(2003)。兒童遊戲與發展。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lofland, John、Lofland, Lyn H.、任凱、王佳煌(2005)。質性研究法:社會情境的觀察與分析。臺北:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.潘慧玲(2003)。教育研究的取徑:概念與應用。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
10.Williamson, P. A.,、Silvern, S. B.(1991)。Thematic-fantasy play and story comprehension。Play and early literacy development。Albany。  new window
11.Pellegrini, A. D.(1991)。Communicating in and about play: The effect of play centers on preschools’ explicit language。The young child at play。Washington, DC。  new window
12.Snow, C. E., Hemphill, L.,、Barnes, W. S.(1991)。Unfulfilled expectations: Home and school influences on literacy。Cambridge,MA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top