:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:土石流災害的社會脆弱性研究--以南投縣水里鄉上安社區為例
書刊名:社會與區域發展學報
作者:陳志嘉陳怡如徐勝一
作者(外文):Chen, Ji-jiaChen, Yi-juHsu, Sheng-i
出版日期:2010
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:上安社區土石流災害社會脆弱性調適能力Shang-Ann communityDebris flow hazardSocial vulnerabilityAdaptive capacity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:35
近年來,極端氣候及土地超限利用造成全球的災害頻仍,使災害脆弱性之研究也愈趨重要。臺灣爲海島國家,在面對全球環境變遷時,相對於其他國家更顯得脆弱。尤其是每年國內發生的土石流災害均造成居民生命財產的嚴重損失。有鑑於此,本文以社會脆弱性研究之觀點,探討南投縣水里鄉上安社區土石流災害的人文意涵。利用文獻回顧、參與觀察法和深度訪談法的方式,聚焦於社區居民在土石流災害時所面臨的生計壓力,及影響其調適性的因素。研究發現,居民災害識覺與經驗、緊密的社會網絡、多樣化的生計、制度及經濟援助,將有助於提升調適能力。然而,改變社區居民的生計活動,卻也可能損害了其他方面的調適能力,且出現新興的脆弱性。希冀本研究成果可作爲未來政府在災害管理上的決策參考。
In recent years, extreme climate and land overuse have led to frequent disasters worldwide, which considerably promotes the importance of research on hazard vulnerability. As an island country, Taiwan is more vulnerable, compared with other countries, when facing global environmental changes. Among all natural disasters, debris flow hazard happening in Taiwan each year causes critical loss of lives and properties to residents here. Due to the above mentioned, this essay, adopting a social vulnerability-based approach, focuses on the human implications of debris flow hazard happening in Shang-Ann Community in Shueili Township, Nantou County. Employing methods including literature review, participation observation, and depth interview, it concentrates on the pressure of livelihood when the residents suffer from debris flow hazard, and on the factors affecting the determinants of adaptation. This research shows that the acquisition of hazard perception and learning, strong social networks, diversity of livelihood, institutions, and economic support, helps improve adaptive capacity. Nevertheless, by changing the livelihoods of those residents, it is also possible to do harm to adaptive capacity in other aspects, and thus results in emerging vulnerabilities. Hopefully, the results of this study could be important references in hazard management for the future government.
期刊論文
1.Adger, W. Neil(2000)。Social and ecological resilience: Are they related?。Progress in Human Geography,24(3),347-364。  new window
2.Brooks, N.、Adger, W. N.、Kelly, P. M.(2005)。The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation。Global Environmental Change,15,151-163。  new window
3.Bohle, H. G.、Downing, T. E.、Watts, M. J.(1994)。Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity。Global Environmental Change,4,37-48。  new window
4.Watts, M.、Bohle, H.(1993)。The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine。Progress in Human Geography,17,43-67。  new window
5.Turner, B. L. II、Kasperson, Roger E.、Matson, Pamela A.、McCarthy, James J.、Corell, Robert W.、Christensen, Lindsey、Eckley, Noelle、Kasperson, Jeanne X.、Luers, Amy、Martello, Marybeth L.、Polsky, Colin、Pulsipher, Alexander、Schiller, Andrew(2003)。A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,100(14),8074-8079。  new window
6.Adger, W. Neil(2003)。Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change。Economic Geography,79(4),387-404。  new window
7.Adger, W. Neil(2006)。Vulnerability。Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions,16(3),268-281。  new window
8.方珍玲(2006)。臺灣社區營造與產業發展之伙伴關係--以池上鄕萬安社區及水里鄕上安社區爲例。社區發展,89,18-27。  延伸查詢new window
9.李心平、張裴章(1995)。模糊控制理論應用於土石流預警系統之研究。中華水土保持學報,26(2),145-154。  延伸查詢new window
10.林冠慧(2004)。全球變遷下脆弱性與調適性研究方法與方法論的探討。全球變遷通訊雜誌,43,33-38。  延伸查詢new window
11.林銘昌、林士彥(2004)。社區傳統產業轉型之總體營造--南投縣上安社區案例探討。造園季刊,51,21-30。  延伸查詢new window
12.連惠邦(1998)。土石流預警系統之硏發。臺灣水土保持,24,5-11。  延伸查詢new window
13.施邦築、鄭光炎(1998)。土石流危險區域之硏判及預警。臺北科技大學學報,31(2),95-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.詹錢登(1998)。土石流的發生與運動。水利技術,1(1),132-135。  延伸查詢new window
15.游繁結(1998)。陳有蘭溪集水區之土石流災害。水利技術,1(1),145-146。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝正倫(1998)。土石流防災預警系統之現況與展望。環境教育季刊,35,29-35。  延伸查詢new window
17.張宏忠(2003)。水里鄕上安休閒農漁園區--山城水都、槑槑風情。農政與農情,131,61-64。  延伸查詢new window
18.Kelly, P.M.、Adger, W.N.(2000)。Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation。Climatic Change,47,325-352。  new window
19.O’Brien, K.L.、Leichenko, R.、Kelkarc, U.、Venemad, H.、Aandahl, G.、Tompkins, H.、Javed, A.、Bhadwal, S.、Barg, S.、Nygaard, L.、West, J.(2004)。Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India。Global Environmental Change,14,303-313。  new window
20.Odeh, D.J.(2002)。Natural Hazards Vulnerability Assessment for Statewide Mitigation Planning in Rhode Island。Natural Hazards Rev,3(4),177-187。  new window
21.Robards, M.、Alessa, L.(2004)。Timescape of community resilience and vulnerability in the circumpolar north。Arctic,51,415-427。  new window
22.Stevenson, M.G.(1997)。Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment。Arctic,49,278-291。  new window
23.Barnett, J.(2001)。Adapting to climate change in Pacific Island countries: the problem of uncertainty。World Development,29(6),977-993。  new window
24.Usher, P.J.(2000)。Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management。Arctic,53,183-193。  new window
25.Vasquez-Leon, M.、West, C.T.、Finan, T.J.(2003)。A comparative assessment of climate vulnerability: agriculture and ranching on both sides of the US-Mexico border。Global Environmental Change,13,159-173。  new window
26.Ford, J.、Smit, B.(2004)。A framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities in the Canadian Arctic to risks associated with climate change。Arctic,57,389-400。  new window
會議論文
1.陳紫娥(1997)。南投縣水里鄕ニ廍三廍土石流災害地學環境之比較研究7-23。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.謝正倫(1991)。土石流預警系統之研究。臺南市:國立成功大學臺南水工試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Adger, N.W.、Nick B.、Bentham G.(2004)。New Indicators of Vulnerability & Adaptative Capacity。  new window
3.Brooks, N.(2003)。Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework。Norwich。  new window
學位論文
1.李明晃(1989)。立體格子型壩防治土石流功效之試驗(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃柏鈞(2001)。環境風險知覺之研究--以神木村土石流為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.魏玉蕙(2002)。921地震災害與災後重建之研究--以埔里蜈蚣里為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳亭樺(2003)。無奈卻貪楚的地景--陳有蘭溪流域災害空間生産的政治經濟學硏究。臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃小玲(1999)。大規模災害後復健及居民生活變遷之探討: 以賀伯風災南投縣信義鄕豐丘、神木兩村爲例。臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡菁芳(2003)。流淚的陳有蘭溪: 土石流災害的社會心理衝撃。臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.魏雅蘭(2001)。本土性防災社區形成要素之探討: 以長青、龍安、蜈松社區爲例。臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hewitt, K.(1997)。Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters。Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
2.McCarthy, JJ.、Canziani, O.F.、Leary, N.A.、Dokken, D.J.、White, K.S.(2001)。Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability。沒有紀錄:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.林照真(2002)。「戰慄土石流--災難、政治與風險管理」。台北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.詹錢登(2000)。土石流概論。臺北:科技圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Burton, I.、Kates, R. W.、White, G. F.(1993)。The Environment as Hazard。N.Y:London:Guildford Press:Guildford Press。  new window
6.陳亮全(2003)。社區防災的推動。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kasperson, J.X.、Kasperson, R.E.(2001)。Global Environmental Risk。London。  new window
其他
1.IPCC(2007)。Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers,http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kasperson, J. X.、Kasperson, R. E.、Turner, B. L. II、AMD Schiller, A.、Hsieh, W.(2005)。Vulnerability to global environmental change。Social Contours of Risk. Vol. II: Risk Analysis Corporations and the Globalization of Risk。London:Earthscan。  new window
2.Smiîhers, J.、Smit, B.(1997)。Agricultural system response to environmental stress。Agricultural Restructuring and Sustainability: A Geographical Perspective。New York:CAB International。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE