In recent years the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan vigorously promotes ”life education” as a major initiative. The proposed topics of life education include the ultimate value and meaning of human life and draw resources from religious contents. Even though content s on religious faiths may enrich life education, it is probable that the former can create a complex dilemma for the latter. If the contents and policy of life education are biased toward a certain religion, faith, or value system, the principle of neutrality and the commitment of a liberal democracy to fairness would be violated. However, if life education is detached from all religions, faiths, and value systems, it may become vague and devoid of content. The principle of neutrality has also been facing severe challenges to address such issues as whether value neutrality would foster value blindness. Recent interpretation of the principle of neutrality gradually turned toward the identification of common values. Nonetheless, an issue is how to determine the common values and foundation in a pluralistic, democratic society. Another issue is how a common foundation or concrete assertions can be developed among different religions, faiths, and value systems. This research focuses on the issue of neutrality and constructs a new approach to addressing diversity. Following this new approach a public policy, such as life education policy, can be made without turning into the dilemma aforementioned. The presumptions of a liberal democracy can also be maintained and realized. A theoretical foundation of life education policy making within a liberal democracy is also provided.