:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The "Citizen Scientist": Reflections on the Public Role of Scientists in Response to Emerging Biotechnologies in New Zealand
書刊名:East Asian Science, Technology and Society
作者:Cronin, Karen
出版日期:2010
卷期:4:4
頁次:頁503-519
主題關鍵詞:Scientific citizenshipCitizen scientistScientific reflexivityScience and society engagementBiotechnology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
Abstract Much of the traditional discussion on science and society engagement has concentrated on the role (and even duties) of citizens in response to science, and on attempts to scientise civilian consciousness to appreciate the benefits of scientific progress. Irwin’s (1995) concept of “Citizen Science” was an important milestone in our understanding of “science and society” relations, which focused attention on the needs and concerns of citizens and looked to a new form of science “enacted by citizens themselves” (Irwin 1995: ix). In this paper, I consider the other side of the science and society relationship by focusing on the scientist as citizen. Over time, a significant minority of scientists have been active in raising public concerns around the social impacts of science and technology, particularly around biotechnology and nanotechnology. This paper presents results from a New Zealand study that engaged scientists with community groups in dialogue about biotechnology. I discuss how this may represent an emerging form of scientific reflexivity and consider the implications for future engagement practice.
期刊論文
1.Burchell, K.(2007)。Empiricist selves and contingent “others” : The performative function of the discourse of scientists working in conditions of controversy。Public Understanding of Science,16,145-162。  new window
2.Christakis, N.(1992)。Ethics are local: engaging cross-cultural variation in the ethics for clinical research。Social Science & Medicine,35(9),1079-1091。  new window
3.Cronin,K.(2008)。The privatization of public talk: A New Zealand case study on the use of dialogue for civic engagement in biotechnology governance。New Genetics and Society,27(3),285-299。  new window
4.Davies, Sarah R.(2008)。Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public。Science Communication,29(4),413-434。  new window
5.Davies, K. G.、Wolf-Phillips, J.(2006)。Scientific citizenship and good governance: Implications for biotechnology。Trends in Biotechnology,24(2),57-61。  new window
6.Egorova, Y.(2007)。The meanings of science: Conversations with geneticists。Health Care Analysis,15,1-58。  new window
7.Fisher, M.、Small, B.、Roth, H.、Mallon, M.、Jerebine, B.(2005)。What do individuals in different science groups within a life sciences organization think about genetic modification?。Public Understanding of Science,14(3),317-326。  new window
8.Gerhards, J.、Schafer, M.(2009)。Two normative models of science in the public sphere: Human genome sequencing in German and US mass media。Public Understanding of Science,18,437-451。  new window
9.Hagemann, K.、Scholderer, J.(2009)。Hot potato: Expert and consumer differences in the perception of second-generation novel food。Risk Analysis,29(7),1041-1055。  new window
10.Henderson, A.(2005)。Activism in “Paradise”: Identity management in a public relations campaign against genetic engineering。Journal of Public Relations Research,17(2),117-137。  new window
11.Macer, D.、Ng, M.(2000)。Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan。Nature Biotechnology,18,945-947。  new window
12.Kerr, A.、Cunningham-Burley, S.、Amos, A.(1997)。The new genetics professionals’ discursive boundaries。The Social Review,45(2),279-304。  new window
13.Martin-Sempere, M. J.、Garzon-Garcia, B.、Rey-Rocha, J.(2008)。Scientists' motivations to communicate science and technology to the public: Surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair。Public Understanding of Science,17,349-367。  new window
14.Meisenberg, G(2009)。Designer babies on tap? Medical students, attitudes to pre-implantaton genetic screening。Public Understanding of Science,18,149-166。  new window
15.Pels, D.(2000)。Reflexivity: One step up。Theory, Culture and Society,17(3),1-25。  new window
16.Scharz, G.(1998)。The Swiss vote on gene technology。Science,281,1810-1811。  new window
17.Small, B.、Fisher, M.(2005)。Measuring biotechnology employees, ethical attitudes towards a controversial transgenic cattle project: The ethical valence matrix。Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,18(5),495-508。  new window
18.Small, B.、Mallon, M.(2007)。Science, society, ethics and trust: Scientists’ attitudes to commercialisation and democratisation of science。International Studies of Management and Organisation,37(1),103-124。  new window
19.Sommer, J.(2010)。The 2008 Survey of New Zealand scientists and technologists。New Zealand Science Review,67(1)。  new window
20.Chasin, R.、Herzig, M.、Roth, S.、Chasin, L.、Becker, R.、Stains, R.(1996)。From diatribe to dialogue on divisive public issues: Approaches drawn from family therapy。Mediation Quarterly,13(4),323-344。  new window
21.Goven, Joanna(2003)。Deploying the consensus conference in New Zealand: Democracy and deproblematization。Public Understanding of Science,12,423-440。  new window
22.Funtowicz, S. O.、Ravetz, J. R.(1993)。Science for the post normal age。Futures,25(7),739-755。  new window
研究報告
1.Cronin, K.(2008)。Deliberative dialogue for sustainable biotechnology governance in New Zealand。  new window
學位論文
1.Cronin, K.(2007)。Risk communication and dialogue: A critical exploration of communication practices in the management of technological risk(博士論文)。Victoria Management School, Victoria University of Wellington,Wellington。  new window
圖書
1.Cooperrider, D. L.、Sorensen, P. F., Jr.,、Whitney, D.、Yaeger, T. F.(2000)。Appreciative inquiry: Rethinking human organisation toward a positive theory of change。Champaign, Illinois:Stripes Publishing, L.K.C.。  new window
2.Cronin, K.、Jackson, L.(2004)。Hands across the water. Developing dialogue between stakeholders in the New Zealand biotechnology debate。Wellington:VicLink, Victoria University of Wellington。  new window
3.Eichelbaum, T.、Allan, J.、Fleming, J.、Randerson, R.(2001)。Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on Genetic Modification。Wellington:New Zealand Government。  new window
4.Green, W.(1979)。Focus on social responsibility in science. Proceedings of a Symposium on Social Responsibility in Science at the ANZAAS Congress, Auckland January 1979。Wellington:New Zealand Association of Scientists。  new window
5.Heinemann, J. A.(2004)。Challenges to regulating the industrial gene: Views inspired by the New Zealand experience。challenging science: Science and society issues in New Zealand。Dunmore Press。  new window
6.Hipkins, R.、Stockwell, W.、Bolstad, R.、Baker, R.(200201)。Commonsense, trust and science: How patterns of beliefs and attitudes to science pose challenges for effective communication。Wellington:New Zealand Ministry of Research Science and Technology。  new window
7.Hunt, L. M.(2009)。Doing science in a culture of accountability: Compliance through resistance to alienation and estrangement。Kotuituv: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences。  new window
8.Morgan, M.、Fischhoff, B.、Bostrom, A.、Atman, C.(2001)。Risk communication: A mental models approach。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Pielke, Roger A.(2007)。The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Third World Network(1995)。The need for greater regulation and control of genetic engineering: A statement for scientists concerned about current trends in the new biotechnology。Penang:Third World Network。  new window
11.US National Academy of Sciences--Committee on Recombinant DNA Molecules(19730921)。Letter to Science。  new window
12.Chyba, C.(1980)。The recombinant DNA debate and the precedent of Leo Szilard。Science and ethical responsibility。Massachusetts:Addison Wesley。  new window
13.Van den Daele, W.(1996)。Objektives Wissen als politicshe ressource. Experten and Gegenexperten im Diskurs。Kommunication and Entscheidung。Berlin:Sigma。  new window
14.Yamaguchi, T.(2010)。Discussing Nascent Technologies: Citizens Confront Nanotechnology in Food。East Asian Science。  new window
15.Slovic, Paul E.(2000)。The perception of risk。Earthscan Publications。  new window
16.Nowotny, H.、Gibbons, M.、Scott, P.(2001)。Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
17.Bohm, David、Nichol, L.(1996)。On Dialogue。Routledge。  new window
18.Archer, Margaret S.(2007)。Making our way through the world。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Irwin, Alan、Wynne, Brian(1996)。Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology。Cambridge University Press。  new window
20.Irwin, Alan(1995)。Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development。Routledge。  new window
其他
1.Royal Society of New Zealand(2001)。Witness presentation to the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification,http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/Site/news/science_topics/biol/gene/update2.aspx, 20091112。  new window
2.Wills, P.(19951017)。Statement of evidence By Peter Rowland Wills In Support Of Request For Urgency-Wai 262 Claim, The Waitangi Tribunal,http://www.phy.auckland.ac.nz/Staf6/prw/Recent_Work/SubmissionsAVai262_statement.htm, 20091006。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wynne, B.(1996)。Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science。Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE