:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鐵路改建工程風險管理與本質較安全設計策略
書刊名:勞工安全衛生研究季刊
作者:陳俊男金大仁
作者(外文):Chen, Chun-nanKam, Tai-yan
出版日期:2011
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁121-135
主題關鍵詞:鐵路改建工程風險管理因果分析本質較安全Railway reconstruction projectRisk managementCause-consequence analysisInherently safer
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
鐵路改建工程有減少公害、改善交通、消除事故、空出土地提供公共空間規劃等效益,因此全國有14個計畫正積極推展中。改建工程之費用高、工期久、路線長、項目龐雜, 故風險極高,其中以緊鄰鐵路沿線施工、侵入電氣化區間造成觸電或火車碰撞之風險最高,針對此項目,本文應用風險辨識、分析、評估、改善、回饋等五項風險管理模式找出其中不可接受風險項目,再應用本質較安全設計策略予以改善成可接受風險。 前述管理模式中,本文以FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis)結合創新之橫式因果分析法 (Cause-Consequence Analysis) 找出風險要項,對風險要項以創意方法結合本質較安全設計策略先提出監測儀器方案使風險大幅降低,再提出鋼構覆蓋或改變操作程序兩個改善方案,讓管理者可依成本、時程考量來選擇適用方案改善剩餘風險,最後使平均風險值降低為原來的 20 至 56 分之1。本研究方法具有層階分明、因果明確、量化精準、改良有法、選案公正、功效宏大等六項優勢,值得推廣並應用於類似工程上。
Abstract Railway reconstruction can reduce pollution, improve traffic condition, and eliminate accidents. When the railway becomes underground, the vacant land can also provide public space for commercial development or other applications. Therefore, in Taiwan 14 railway reconstruction projects have been undertaken. A railway reconstruction project usually takes a long time to complete and during this period, many activities of high risk may be performed in the vicinity of the reconstruction site. In particular, the invasion of a foreign object into the electrification area may cause train collision which can become a high risk to the project. In general, the appropriate applications of inherent safer-design strategy and risk management techniques such as risk identification, analysis, evaluation, improvement, and feedback can lower the risk level for the site. In this paper, a method for controlling the risk level of a railway reconstruction site is proposed. The Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Cause-Consequence Analysis (CCA) are used to identify the potential risks. Some creative methods based on an inherent safer-design strategy are used to establish a monitoring program to reduce the risk level. Several examples are given to demonstrate the applications of the proposed method. It has been shown that the use of the proposed method can achieve the risk level 20 to 56 times lower than the original one.
圖書
1.行政院勞工委員會(2009)。危害辨識及風險評估技術指引。台灣省台北市:行政院勞工委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.金大仁(2008)。可靠度評估。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃清賢(1996)。危害分析與風險評估。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.謝定亞、蔣偉寧、蔡義本、王弓、許文科(2001)。公共建設風險管理之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭建和(2005)。鐵路立體化工程施工災害及風險管理之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳柏震(2009)。緊鄰鐵路沿線移動式起重機具施工安全風險評估之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.交通部鐵路改建工程局(2005)。電化鐵路安全須知。  延伸查詢new window
5.交通部鐵路改建工程局(2008)。工程紀要。  延伸查詢new window
6.張承明、于樹偉(2009)。系統化事故原因調查技術研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.張應輝(2001)。台鐵營運安全之研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.張承明(2001)。本質安全在化學製程設計之應用。  延伸查詢new window
9.林建明、陳俊瑜(2007)。以本質較安全設計探討浸油式變壓器危害預防。  延伸查詢new window
10.公共工程委員會(1999)。政府採購法。  延伸查詢new window
11.交通部鐵路改建工程局(2001)。鐵路沿線工程施工行車安全須知。  延伸查詢new window
12.交通部鐵路改建工程局(2001)。鐵路沿線施工安全暨災害案例檢討報告。  延伸查詢new window
13.內政部消防署(1996)。消防機關辦理火災後建築物及物品損失估算暫行基準。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bell BJ, Swain AD.(1981)。A procedure for conducting a human reliability analysis for nuclear power plants。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE