:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同線徑網球線之機械特性探討
書刊名:體育學報
作者:詹一民張家銘 引用關係林秀真
作者(外文):Jan, Yi-minChang, Chia-mingLin, Hsiu-chen
出版日期:2011
卷期:44:3
頁次:頁367-380
主題關鍵詞:網球線網線線徑勁度延展性Tennis stringDiameterStiffnessDuctility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:33
  • 點閱點閱:121
目的:本研究的目的主要是要探討不同線徑大小之合成網球拍網線的材料特性。以市售網線線徑大小爲15至18 gauge等四種的有心線,實心線,無心線等不同結構設計的網線,探討勁度及最大位移量等機械特性隨線徑大小改變的差異性。方法:實驗藉由萬能材料試驗機將各種網球線分別做拉力測試至拉斷網線,記錄其受力強度與延展性,並計算網線在一般建議穿網線的特定拉力下的勁度,進一步以統計分析加以比較。結果:延展性的表現上,有心線整體表現最佳,而大線徑之實心線最差。三種常見網線種類在不同線徑之強度-位移曲線的表現則十分相似,除了線徑最大的實心線表現與其他線徑相較下有較明顯的差異。在勁度表現上,隨著線徑增加,網線的勁度也隨之增加,並且在不同線徑大小之間有顯著差異。除了1.20mm的無心線在勁度表現上,趨近於1.35mm的無心線。結論:三種常用網線的機械特性測試顯示,當考慮擊球之控球與穩定性,有心線中等線徑(1.25mm與1.30mm)表現較理想。無心線的機械特性整體表現較佳,尤其是細線徑。然而細線徑的實心線擊球穩定性表現可能稍差,建議選用1.30mm線徑網線爲佳。在選手或網球運動者選擇網球拍網線時,本研究之結果可做爲參考或推薦,以維持擊球時的穩定性及增加操控性及運動表現。
Purpose: Monofilament, ployester, and multifilament are the common types of tennis string. In the current study, we intended to discuss the mechanical properties with different string diameters, 15 gauge (1.35mm), 16 gauge (1.30mm), 17 gauge (1.25mm), and 18 gauge (1.20mm), in those strings. Method: The experiments were performed in a laboratory with controlled temperature and humidity. We used the universal testing machine to obtain the tensile load-displacement curve for all strings. The stiffness at 22.7kg, 25kg, 27.3kg, and 29.6kg in the load-displacement curve were calculated, and the nonparametric test was used to compare the differences between different string diameters. Results: The monofilament showed the highest ductility, and the polyester with diameter of 1.30mm showed less ductility. For the same type of strings, different diameters would preserve similar characteristics of the load-displacement curve, expect for the polyester. In general, as the diameter of the string increased, the stiffness would also increase. The statistically significant differences in stiffness were found among different diameters of the same type of the strings. One exception was found for the multifilament, the string with 1.20mm diameter showed similar stiffness with the diameter of 1.35mm. Conclusion: The results of this study can be a reference for the novice or expert players in choosing suitable string. And it also can provide the information about properties with different string diameter for optimal exercise performance.
期刊論文
1.石翔至、蘇榮立、李秀華(20061200)。球拍勁度與網線張力對網球拍恢復係數之影響。南亞學報,26,頁295-303。  延伸查詢new window
2.林寶城(19930300)。網球拍勁度對擊球時所產生的動力學振動響應。國立政治大學學報,66(上冊),145-201。  延伸查詢new window
3.Groppel, J. L.、Shin, I. S.、Thomas, I. A.、Welk, G. J.(1987)。The effect of string type and tension on impact in midsized and oversized tennis racket。International Journal of Sports Biomechanics,3,40-46。  new window
4.連玉輝(20090300)。全方位強勢網球(Complete Power Tennis)模式之補強。運動教練科學,13,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Dusek, D.(199904)。Strings fever。Tennis Magazine,64-66。  new window
6.Dusek, D.(2000)。Strings attached。Tennis Magazine,4,53-55。  new window
7.Baker, J. A.、John, A. W.、Wilson, B. D.(1978)。The effect of tennis racket stiffness and string tesion on ball velocity after impact。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,49(3),255-259。  new window
8.張思敏(1999)。大專男子網球選手對球拍線之認知與使用變化之自覺量表分析之研究。大專體育,46,57-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.詹一民、張家銘、林秀真(20071200)。市售不同結構網線受力機械特性之探討。體育學報,40(4),23-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Cross, R.、Bower, R.(2001)。Measurement of string sension in tennis racket。Sports Engineering,4,165-175。  new window
11.Brody, H.(1987)。Model of tennis racket impact。International Journal of Sport Biomechanics,5(4),451-456。  new window
12.Bower, R.、Cross, R.(2003)。Player sensitivity to changes in string tension in a tennis racket。Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,6(1),120-131。  new window
13.丁麗芬、林寶城、王柏村(20031200)。網線張力對網球拍品質指標之影響。北體學報,11,29-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.丁麗芬、周中明(20011200)。新型網球對球拍碰撞之動力學分析。北體學報,9,219-234。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.石世濱、相子元(19970900)。網線材質張力及拍面大小對網球拍彈性恢復係數之影響。體育學報,23,189-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林寶城(1998)。網球拍面振動特性分析。臺灣師大體育研究,5,67-86。  延伸查詢new window
17.林寶城、江界山(19960600)。不同網球拍拍線截面對擊球時所產生之動力響應。體育學報,21,137-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.蕭美珠(20051200)。不同張力網球拍擊球之動力響應分析。北體學報,13,139-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.連玉輝、黃國恩、郭繼華、康正男、王傑賢(2008)。網球拍及網線的結構特性之分析。中華體育季刊,22(3),106-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.蘇榮立(1995)。不同勁度網球拍對恢復係數之影響。體育學報,11,261-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Bower, R.、Sinclair, P.(1999)。Tennis racket stiffness and string tension effect on rebound velocity and angle for an oblique impact。Journal of Human Movement Studies,37,271-286。  new window
22.Cross, R.(2000)。Flexible beam analysis of the effects of string tension and frame stiffness on racket performance。Sports Engineering,3,111-122。  new window
23.Cross, R.、Lindsey, C.、Andruczyk, D.(2000)。Laboratory testing of tennis strings。Sports Engineering,3,219-230。  new window
24.Gray, B.(2010)。The pros' biggest secret。Tennis Magazine,(1/2),44-45。  new window
25.Knundson, D.(1997)。The effect of string tension on rebound accuracy in tennis impacts。International Sports Journal,1,108-112。  new window
圖書
1.許樹淵、張思敏、張清泉、田文政(2000)。網球技術理論與實際。中華民國網球協會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brody, H.(2002)。The tennis racquets。Tennis: Olympic handbook of sports medicine。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top