:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:降低鼻導管持續正壓呼吸器管路滑脫率方案
書刊名:榮總護理
作者:陳逸玲施曉娟鄭淑玲
作者(外文):Chen, Yi-linShih, Hsiao-chuanCheng, Shue-lin
出版日期:2011
卷期:28:3
頁次:頁266-274
主題關鍵詞:鼻導管持續正壓呼吸器管路滑脫Nasal continuous positive airway pressureNCPAPPipeline slippage
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:1
鼻導管持續正壓呼吸器(Nasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, NCPAP)已被廣泛運用在治療高危險性新生兒呼吸窘迫症候群,固定方式為決定能否成功渡過呼吸窘迫之重要因素。本單位之高危險性新生兒多需使用NCPAP,但常見管路滑脫導致呼吸暫停及心搏過緩合併低血氧情形或需重固定而造成工作上的負荷。經現況分析發現:NCPAP護理技術標準書內容未描寫管路固定細節,固定方式不一致、同仁未接受安撫技巧相關之在職教育且執行率低及NCPAP固定帽彈性疲乏,導致NCPAP管路滑脫率高達131% 。改善目標為降低NCPAP管路滑脫率至65.5%,藉著修訂NCPAP護理技術標準書並宣導、實施安撫技巧在職教育及查核、製作新式固定帽三項解決辦法後,滑脫率降至28%;而NCPAP平均使用天數由10天下降為5天為本專案最佳之附加效益。
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) has been used extensively in the treatment of infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The way to fasten the device determinates the success to go through RDS. In our unit, most of the infants need to use NCPAP, but pipeline slippage occurs frequently which causes apnea bradycardia and cynosis. Besides, resetting the device will increase the work load. The current analysis: NCPAP nursing standard does not describe in detail the way to fix pipeline. With no consistent instruction on how to fix pipeline, no comfort skill on job training among colleagues and NCPAP cap fatigue, all these led to a high NCPAP pipeline slippage rate of 131%. The following 3 methods decreased slippage rate to 28% and reduced the average number of days of NCPAP usage to 5 days, firstly, modifying the NCPAP nursing standard books, secondly, carrying out comfort skill on-job-training, and thirdly, making new device to fix pipeline. These are the best benefits of this project.
期刊論文
1.Aita, M.、Snider, L.(2003)。The art of developmental care in the NICU: A concept analysis。Journal of Advanced Nursing,41(3),223-232。  new window
2.梁幸如(20020900)。寧握護理在新生兒之應用。長庚護理,13(3)=39,247-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.梁幸如、王如華、張玉坤、王銘賢(20000800)。寧握護理對早產兒扎足跟血的疼痛減輕之探討。醫學研究,20(7),368-376。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃秀文、吳雅雯(20070300)。某呼吸照護病房降低呼吸器管路鬆脫率之改善專案。長期照護雜誌,11(1),67-75。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉惠玲、游雅蘭、楊閔棻(20050900)。採用鼻式持續正壓呼吸器早產兒皮膚受壓改善方案。榮總護理,22(3),289-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Buettiker, V.、Hug, M. I.、Baenziger, O.、Meyer, C.、Frey, B.(2004)。Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns。Journal of Intensive Care Medicine,130,926-930。  new window
7.Chan, K. M.、Chan, H. B.(2007)。The use of bubble CPAP in premature infants: Local experience。Hong Kong Journal of Paediatrics (New Series),12,86-92。  new window
8.Davis, P.、Davies, M.、Faber, B.(2001)。A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 gm: Binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs。Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition,85,82-85。  new window
9.黃金梅、董宛姝、郭麗坽、張瑩如(20040300)。Comparison of Pain Responses of Premature Infants to the Heelstick between Containment and Swaddling。The Journal of Nursing Research,12(1),31-40。new window  new window
10.Jackson, J. K.、Vellucci, J.、Johnson, P.、Kilbride, H. W.(2003)。Evidence-based approach to change in clinical practice: Introduction of expanded nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in an intensive care nursery。Pediatrics,111,542-547。  new window
11.Klerk, A. D.(2008)。Humidified high-flow nasal cannula: Is it the new and improved CPAP。Advances in Neonatal Care,8(2),98-106。  new window
12.McCoskey, L.(2008)。Nursing care guidelines for prevention of nasal breakdown in neonates receiving nasal CPAP。Advances of Neonatal Care,8(2),116-124。  new window
13.Paoli, A. G.、Morley, C.、Davis, P. G.(2003)。Nasal CPAP for neonates: What do we know in 2003?。Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition,88,168-172。  new window
14.Shanmugananda, K.、Rawal, J.(2007)。Nasal trauma due to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in newborns。Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition,92,18。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE