:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Trajectory of the Indo-ASEAN Trade: FTA and Beyond
書刊名:WTO研究
作者:聖古普塔德巴喜斯.查卡拉鮑迪(Debashis Chakraborty普瑞坦.班那吉
作者(外文):Dipankar SenguptaPritam Banerjee
出版日期:2011
卷期:20
頁次:頁131-180
主題關鍵詞:印度貿易政策國際貿易組織東協經濟整合IndiaASEANTrade policyInternational trade organizationsEconomic integration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
一般而言,截至2003年止,印度都遵循多邊途徑促進貿易,但其後杜哈回合(Doha Round)談判牛步化導致印度貿易政策轉向區域貿易協定(RTAs)。現在印度已與數個發展中國家與貿易集團維持優惠貿易關係。在印度RTA議程裡東協國家佔有特別地位,主要原因有三。其一,雖然印度在亞洲已與數國進行RTA談判,但就東協成員的數目來看東協所涉及的貿易自由化遠比其他談判對象來得廣泛。其二,透過東協印度政府所採行的「東望政策」(Look East Policy)可發揮極致,達到發展內陸東北地區的目標。其三,一旦與東協的RTA談判成功地含括商品、服務業與投資合作,印度就可與其他的發展中國家的貿易集團如南錐共同體(MERCOSUR)與南部非洲關稅同盟(Southern African Customs Union, SACU)簽訂類似的協定。 本文主旨是試圖解析印度-東協FTA談判的來龍去脈。 由於印度與東協都涉入多邊貿易集團,雙方對後FTA時期真正市場開放之實現皆非常謹慎小心。
India generally followed the multilateral route for trade promotion upto 2003, but in the subsequent period the slow progress of the Doha Round Negotiations motivated it to go for regional trade agreements (RTAs). Presently the country is engaged in preferential trade relationship with several developing countries and trade blocs. In India’s RTA agenda ASEAN countries hold a special position owing to a number of reasons. First, while India has been involved in several RTA negotiations in Asia, ASEAN involves much broader trade liberalization, given the number of countries associated with this initiative. Secondly, through ASEAN the ‘Look East Policy’ adopted by the Indian government can be best utilized to develop the land-locked Northeast region of India. Thirdly, once the ASEAN negotiation covering merchandise products, services and investment collaboration is concluded successfully, India can enter into similar agreements with other developing country trade blocs like MERCOSUR and SACU. In this background, the present analysis attempts to understand the developments in the Indo-ASEAN FTA negotiations. The analysis notes that both India and ASEAN have been involved in multiple trade blocs, as a result of which both sides were weary of the actual market access to be realized in the post-FTA period. Understandably the negotiations for liberalizing merchandise trade continued for a long time with both sides fighting over ‘negative list’ and ‘sensitive list’, ultimately coming into effect from January 2010 onwards. However, the success of the merchandise trade reform has so far exerted limited effect on the negotiations for liberalizing trade in services. It is observed that several key ASEAN countries are concerned over India’s expertise in key service sectors in general and professional services in particular, which force them to proceed slowly in the negotiations. In addition, there is considerable scope to enhance investment collaboration between ASEAN and India. The current paper argues that India on one hand needs to develop key infrastructure linkages with ASEAN countries for export promotion, and enhance the competitiveness of the economy on the other to withstand the effects of cheaper import inflow. It notes that without realization of trade benefits, frictions over anti-dumping measures, rules of origin (ROO) issues etc. might continue to function as a backward pull in the system.
期刊論文
1.Chaisse, Julien、Chakraborty, Debashis、Nag, Biswajit(2011)。A Note on India’s Recent Involvement in Trade Blocs (2003–2009): Regionally Sharpening the Multilateral Agenda?。Connecticut Journal of International Law,26(2)。  new window
2.Bhattacharyya, Anushree、Chakraborty, Debashis(2011)。India's Cross-Border Infrastructure Initiatives in South and Southeast Asia。International Spectator,46(2),109-125。  new window
3.Chakraborty, Debashis、Sengupta, Dipankar(2005)。Learning through Trading? Ten years of India’s Experience in WTO。South Asian Survey,12(2),223-46。  new window
4.Glasmeier and Howlands(1994)。Service-led Rural Development: definitions theories and empirical evidence。International Regional Science Review,16,197-229。  new window
研究報告
1.Kumar, Nagesh(2005)。Towards a Broader Asian Community: Agenda for the East Asia Summit。New Delhi:Research and Information Systems for the Non-Aligned and Developing Countries。  new window
2.Banga, R.、Goldar, B. N.(2004)。Contribution of Services to Output Growth and Productivity in Indian Manufacturing: Pre and Post Reforms。New Delhi。  new window
3.Gootiiz, Batshur、Mattoo, Aaditya(2009)。Services in Doha: What’s on the Table?。Washington DC。  new window
4.Karmakar, S.(2005)。India–ASEAN Cooperation in Services – An Overview。New Delhi。  new window
5.Bhattacharya, B.、Behl, R.、Mago, L. D.(1995)。India-ASEAN trade cooperation and investment opportunities。New Delhi:Indian Institute of Foreign Trade。  new window
圖書
1.Chakraborty, D.、Khan, A. U.(2008)。The WTO Deadlocked: Understanding the dynamics of International trade。SAGE Publications Ltd。  new window
2.Chakraborty, Deabshis(2003)。Laying the base for Reform: Where does Indian Agriculture Stand?。Enabling Agricultural Markets for the Small Indian Farmer。New Delhi。  new window
3.Chakraborty, Debashis、Sengupta, Dipankar(2010)。Integration Experience and Trade Performance of the Indo–ASEAN FTA: Learning by Doing to Live up to Great Expectations。Competitiveness of The Asean Countries, Corporate and Regulatory Drivers。Cheltenham。  new window
4.Sinha Roy, S.(2004)。Complementarities and Potentials of Intra-Regional Transfers of Investments, Technology and Skills in Asia。Towards an Asian Economic Community: Vision of a New Asia。Singapore。  new window
5.Hiratsuka, D.(2010)。Characteristics and determinants of East Asia’s trade patterns。Input Trade and Production Networks in East Asia。Cheltenham。  new window
其他
1.Adamrah, M.(2008)。RI eyes benefits from India pact,http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=13183, 20110620。  new window
2.Asian Development Bank(2009)。Aid for Trade in the Asia and the Pacific: An Update,Manila。  new window
3.(2011)。Indian parts firms eye FTA potential,Kuala Lumpur。  new window
4.Basri, N.B.(2005)。ASEAN-India FTA implementation to be amended to Jan 1, 2007,http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=2794, 20110725。  new window
5.Basu, Nayanima(2010)。India-ASEAN services deal hits roadblock,New Delhi。  new window
6.(2007)。India offers new concessions for ASEAN FTA,New Delhi。  new window
7.Cerojano, T.(2007)。ASEAN-India FTA Faces Roadblock,http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=9458, 20110723。  new window
8.Chakraborty, Deabshis(2003)。Regional trade agreements and the WTO Framework: Reconciling free trade objectives,New Delhi。  new window
9.Consumer Trust and Unity Society(2008)。National Consultation Services Trade and Domestic Regulation in India,Jaipur。  new window
10.(2008)。Honda looks to cash in on India’s FTA with ASEAN,New Delhi。  new window
11.(2008)。Mitsubishi looks at ASEAN trade pact for hub in India,New Delhi。  new window
12.(2007)。ASEAN FTA may be a no-show,New Delhi。  new window
13.Asian Development Bank(2010)。The Rise of Asia’s Middle Class,http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2010/Part-I.asp, 20110717。  new window
14.(2006)。India remove negative list in FTA talks: ASEAN,New Delhi。  new window
15.(2006)。ASEAN suspends FTA talks with India,New Delhi。  new window
16.(2006)。ASEAN wants 600 items in free trade negative list,New Delhi。  new window
17.Hunt, Laalitha(2009)。“India keen to enter ASEAN services sector”,Kuala Lumpur。  new window
18.(2006)。ASEAN doubles its negative list for FTA with India,New Delhi。  new window
19.India Infoline News Service(2007)。India, ASEAN FTA to be signed by July,http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=6918, 20110812。  new window
20.Lum, Tomas,Fischer, Hannah,Gomez-Granger, Julissa,Leland, Anne(2009)。China’s Foreign Aid Activities in Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia,Washington DC.:Congressional Research Service。,http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R40361.pdf。  new window
21.Ministry of Commerce。Export Import Data Bank,http://commerce.nic.in/eidb/default.asp, 20110824。  new window
22.World Trade Organization(2007)。Trade Policy Review, ‘Indonesia’,Geneva。  new window
23.Ministry of Commerce and Industry。SIA Newsletter,New Delhi。  new window
24.Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region(2007)。Minutes of the Meeting Chaired by Shri Pranab Mukherjee, Hon’ble Minister of External Affairs to discuss issues relating to ‘Look East Policy vis-à-vis North Eastern Region,http://mdoner.gov.in/writereaddata/eventimages/LOOK%20EAST%20POLICY7575715857.pdf, 20110722。  new window
25.(2008)。India-ASEAN FTA not to hit southern farmers, says Nath,New Delhi。  new window
26.World Trade Organization。International Trade Statistics,Geneva。  new window
27.Yong, O.K.(2005)。Advancing the ASEAN-India Partnership in the New Millennium,New Delhi。  new window
28.World Trade Organization(2010)。Trade Policy Review, Malaysia,Geneva。  new window
29.Reserve Bank of India(2009)。Indian Investment Abroad in Joint Ventures and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries: 2008-09,Mumbai。  new window
30.Reuters(2005)。India, ASEAN to consider free-trade pact by ’07,http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=3208, 20110422。  new window
31.Sen, Amiti(2011)。Philippines refuse to open up its services market to Indian professionals,New Delhi。  new window
32.Sen, Amiti(2010)。Goods pact in hand, ASEAN goes slow on services deal,New Delhi。  new window
33.Sen, Amiti(2009)。India seeks demand list from ASEAN nations,New Delhi。  new window
34.Sen, Amiti,Siddiqui, H.(2006)。India, ASEAN toiling for pact on negative items under FTA,New Delhi。  new window
35.Sen, R.,Asher, M.G.,Rajan, R.S.(2004)。ASEAN-India economic relations: current status and future prospects,New Delhi。  new window
36.Sidhartha(2006)。India-ASEAN FTA hits fresh roadblock,New Delhi。  new window
37.ET Bureau(2011)。Fear of Indian pros holding up services deal: Malaysia,New Delhi。  new window
38.Vijian, P.(2006)。India halves FTA exclusion list with ASEAN,http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=5575, 20110627。  new window
39.Vijian, P.(2006)。ASEAN not excited by India’s X’mas offer to speed up FTA talks,http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=6800, 20110627。  new window
40.World Bank。World Development Indicators (WDI) Database,http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, 20110825。  new window
41.World Trade Organization。World Tariff Profile,Geneva。  new window
42.World Trade Organization(2007)。Trade Policy Review, ‘Thailand’,Geneva。  new window
43.World Bank。World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS),http://wits.worldbank.org/wits/, 2011/08/25。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top