:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:私有地主參與造林獎勵政策之決策行為分析
書刊名:農業經濟叢刊
作者:林國慶柳婉郁 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Kuo-chingLiu, Wan-yu
出版日期:2011
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁77-105
主題關鍵詞:林業政策決策行為造林獎勵平地景觀造林Forestry policyDecision behaviorAfforestation subsidyPlain landscape afforestation policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
平地景觀造林政策自2001年8月31日經行政院核定實施,由2002年月1日開始執行,政策執行至2007年12月31日結束。平地景觀造林之政策美意頗受好評,但在實際執行過程中仍有許多困難,如專業造林技術不足、私有地主參與意願不高、獎勵金不足等,皆為未來繼續推動造林政策之隱憂。本研究選擇屏東縣為抽樣地區,從參加平地景觀造林與未參加平地景觀造林農民的樣本中,分析私有地主對於獎勵造林政策之看法,以及地主實際參加與否與農地及地主特性之關聯性,以了解平地景觀造林政策對於個人選擇造林之決策的誘因效果。影響私有地主參與造林政策機率之可能因素包括地主特性、農地特性與政策因素。根據本研究之結果顯示,在地主特性中,地主之年紀與家庭年所得與參與機率有顯著正相關,與教育程度有顯著負相關,即較年長、家庭所得較高、教育程度較低之地主,其參加機率較高;在農地特性中,參與造林政策機率與農地面積有顯著正相關,與農地價格及農地坵塊數有顯著負相關,顯示腹地面積較大之地主,價格較低之農地,以及農地坵塊數較少之地主,參加平地景觀造林政策之機率較高。現在政府實施類似的綠色造林政策,目前尚無文獻對於現行綠色造林政策進行成效分析,然根據本研究實地瞭解與訪談得知,在高額造林獎勵金之下,休耕農地推動此政策仍有所困難,農民對於政策仍持續觀望與質疑。本研究與前人文獻不同處在於問卷分析對象為實際上已參加與未參加平地景觀造林政策之農地地主,而非調查未參加地主造林意願高低,因此更能瞭解其己參加平地景觀造林政策地主之影響決策因素與政策誘因效果,在實證結果上期能提供我國政府目前推動綠色造林政策之參考。
To response the Kyoto Protocol, the Plain Landscape Afforestation Program (PLAP) was certified by Executive Yuan in Taiwan on Aug. 31, 2001 and has been implementing for six years since Jan. 1, 2002 Although the PLAP has received a lot of positive comments, still, there are many difficulties during the process of implementation, such as insufficient technology for afforestation, private landowners' low interests in participating in PLAP, insufficient subsidies, and so on, which are potential threats that hinder the PLAP from moving forward in future. In this paper, selecting Ping-Tung County in Taiwan as a sample region and targeting those private landowners with and without intention to participate in the PLAP, respectively, we conduct an empirical analysis based on the Logit model to investigate the factors that determine whether those private landowners join the PLAP, so as to realize the incentive effects of the PLAP upon the personal decision on afforestation. The possible factors that might determine private landowner's participation in the PLAP include landowner's characteristics, cropland characteristics, as well as policy factors. Among them, the policy factors include afforestation subsidy amount, duration of afforestation subsidy, the rules on adjoining and adjacent areas, and so on, which do not reach the remarkable level in statistics though, but the directions of variable signs are consistent with the intuition behind the policy. As for the landowners' characteristics, each of age, education level, and annual household income variables reaches 5% of the remarkable level in statistics; as for the cropland characteristics, each of cropland area, cropland price, and the number of cropland parcels reaches 5% of the remarkable level in statistics. In light of the above, the cropland characteristics are the dominate factor that determines the probability of landowner's participation in the PLAP The empirical result of this paper expects to help the implementation of the afforestation programs in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.吳俊賢、陳溢宏、林俊成、許秋雁(20051200)。私有林農對國土復育策略方案暨行動計畫之意向分析--以南投縣為例。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告,19(4)=250,301-314。  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊成、李國忠(20050800)。都市森林對二氧化碳減量的貢獻。臺灣林業,31(4),10-14。  延伸查詢new window
3.林俊成、李國忠(20050600)。京都議定書生效後之森林資源碳吸存策略。臺灣林業,31(3),12-19。  延伸查詢new window
4.林俊成、李國忠、林裕仁(20000300)。森林收穫與林產品使用之二氧化碳流動與貯存效果初步分析。中華林學季刊,33(1),53-64。  延伸查詢new window
5.林俊成、鄭美如、劉淑芬、李國忠(20020900)。全民造林運動二氧化碳吸存潛力之經濟效益評估。臺灣林業科學,17(3),311-321。  延伸查詢new window
6.顏添明、李久先、許哲維(20080900)。私有林主之參與經驗與造林獎勵政策關係之探討--以臺中縣為例。林業研究季刊,30(3),53-63。  延伸查詢new window
7.Nagelkerke, N. J. D.(1991)。A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination。Biometrika,78(3),691-692。  new window
8.李久先、顏添明、許哲維(2007)。「私有林主對於造林獎勵政策認知及政策態度之探討--以臺中縣爲例」。『林業硏究季刊』,29(4),43-53。  延伸查詢new window
9.Ervin, C. A.、Ervin, D. E.(1982)。“Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Practices: Hypotheses, Evidence, and Policy Implications,”。Land Economics,58,277-292。  new window
10.Hammett, A. L.、Cubbage, F. W.、Luppold, W. G.(1992)。“A Logistic Regression Model of Southern Hardwood Lumber Export Participation,”。Wood and Fiber Science,24(3),315-329。  new window
11.Hardie, I. W.、Parks, P. J.(1991)。“Individual Choice and Regional Acreage Response to Cost-Sharing in the South, 1971 -1981,”。Forest Science,37(1),175-190。  new window
12.Hyberg, B.、Holthausen, D.(1989)。“The Behavior of Nonindustrial Private Forestlandowners,”。Canadian Journal of. Forest Research,19,1014-1023。  new window
13.Korsching, P. F.、Stofferahn, C. W.、Nowak, P. J.、Wagener, D.(1983)。“Adoption Charateristics and Adoption Patterns of Minimum Tillage: Implication for Soil Conservation Program,”。Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,38,428-430。  new window
14.McNamara, K. T.、Wetzstein, M. E.、Douce, G. K.(1991)。“Factors Affecting Peanut Producer Adoption of Integrated Pest Management,”。Review of Agricultural Economics,13(1),129-139。  new window
15.Dennis, D. F.(1989)。“An Economic Analysis of Harvest Behavior: Integrating Forest and Ownership Characteristics,”。Forest Science,35(4),1088-1104。  new window
16.Binkley, C. S.(1981)。“Timber Supply from Nonindustrial Forests,”。Bulletin,92。  new window
17.English, B. C.、Bell, C. D.、Wells, G. R.、Roberts, R. K.(1997)。“Stewardship Incentives in Forestry: Participation Factors in Tennessee,”。The Southern Journal of Applied Forestry,21(1),5-10。  new window
18.Napier, T. L.、Thraem, C. S.、Gore, A.、Goe, W. R.(1984)。“Factors Affecting Adoption of Conventional and Conservation Tillage Practices in Ohio,”。Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,38,205-205。  new window
19.Rahm, M. R.、Huffman, W. E.(1984)。The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66,405-413。  new window
20.Romm, J.、Tuazon, R.、Washburn, C.(1987)。“Relating Forestry Investment to the Characteristics of Nonindustrial Private Forestland Owners in Northern California,”。Forest Science,33(1),197-209。  new window
21.Royer, J.(1987)。“Determinants of Reforestation Behavior among Southern Landowners,”。Forest Science,33(3),654-667。  new window
22.Boyd, R.(1984)。“Government Support of Nonindustrial Production: The Case of Private Forests,”。Southern Economic Journal,51,89-107。  new window
23.Cubbage, F. W.(2003)。“The Value of Foresters,”。Forest Landowner,62(1),16-19。  new window
24.Stevens, T. H.、Dennis, D.、Kittredge, D.、Rickenbach, M.(1999)。“Attitudes and Preferences toward Co-Operative Agreements for Management of Private Forestlands in the Northeastern United States,”。Journal of Environment Management,55(2),81-90。  new window
25.Zhang, D.、Flick, W.(2001)。Sticks, Carrots and Reforestation Investment。Land Economics,77(3),443-456。  new window
26.Nagubadi, V.、McNamara, K. T.、Hoover, W. L.、Miller, W. L.(1996)。“Program Participation Behavior of Nonindustrial Forest Landowners: A Pprobit Analysis,”。Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,28(2),323-336。  new window
會議論文
1.何湘梅、蕭英倫、陳阿興、李建霖(2002)。91年平地景觀造林之執行現況及問題分析。臺灣之造林現況與展望研討會,(會議日期: 2002年11月21日)。臺北:國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林國慶、柳婉郁(2004)。平地造林政策之執行成果與實證分析。臺灣農村經濟學會年會暨學術研討會,(會議日期: 2004年12月18日)。臺北:國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林國慶(2008)。因應國際溫室氣體減量臺灣森林資源經營管理政策之調整 (計畫編號:97 農科-7.2.1-務-e1(2))。臺北:國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.林國慶、王亞男(2003)。平地景觀造林政策評估及林木生長等監測分析 (計畫編號:92-00-5-10)。國立台灣大學農業經濟研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.林國慶(2005)。京都議定書與平地景觀造林政策之研究 (計畫編號:94-00-5-01)。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Alig, R. J.、Lee, K. J.、Moulton, R. J.(1990)。“Likelihood of Timber Management on Nonindustrial Private Forests: Evidence from Research Studies,”。Asheville, North Carolina。  new window
學位論文
1.許惠瑜(2003)。平地景觀造林計劃之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.柳婉郁(2008)。私有地主參與碳匯方案與機制之經濟分析。  延伸查詢new window
3.Megalos, M. A.(2000)。North Carolina Landowner Responsiveness to Forestry Incentives,0。  new window
4.林怡諄(2008)。「農地地主參與造林獎勵政策之決策行爲分析」。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾鈺惠(1993)。「臺灣地區農地造林政策與經濟效益分析」。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Nagubadi, V.(1995)。“Private Landowner Forestry Program Participation Behavior,”。  new window
圖書
1.行政院農業委員會林務局(2008)。愛臺12建設--綠色造林計畫草案。臺北:行政院農業委員會林務局。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院農業委員會(2007)。『農業統計年報』。台北:行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.、Black, W. C.(1995)。Multivariate data analysis with readings。Upper Saddler River, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.Hosmer, D. W.、Lemeshow, S.(1989)。Applied logistic regression。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
5.Boyd, R.、Hyde, W.(1989)。Forestry Sector Intervention: The Impacts of Public Regulation on Social Welfare。Iowa City。  new window
6.Lorenzo, A. B.、Beard, P.(1996)。“Factors Affecting the Decisions of NIPF Owners to Use Assistance Programs,”。Learning from the past, prospects for the future。Washington DC。  new window
7.Sills, E. O.、Abt, K. L.(2003)。Forests in a Market Economy。Boston。  new window
8.Cubbage, F. W.、Haynes, R. W.(1988)。“Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Market Responses to Timber Scarcity Problems,”。Marketing Research Report。Washington。  new window
其他
1.王瑋翰,吳柏宏,陳正豪(2010)。「農地地主對於綠色造林政策看法之硏究--以臺南縣爲例」。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院經濟建設委員會(2008)。『綠色造林計畫草案』,台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.林國慶,柳婉郁(2006)。「私有地主參與平地造林政策之行爲分析」,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Esseks, J. D.,Moulton, R. J.(2000)。“Evaluating the Forest Stewardship Program through A National Survey of Participating Forestland Owners,”,DeKalb, IL.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top