:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美軍全新作戰二部曲--海空整體作戰
書刊名:國防雜誌
作者:宋吉峰
作者(外文):Sung, Chi-feng
出版日期:2012
卷期:27:2
頁次:頁38-55
主題關鍵詞:海空整體作戰反介入區域拒止AirSea battleAnti-accessArea denial
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
提  要 一、2009年9月,美國空軍參謀長諾頓施瓦茨上將和美國海軍作戰部長加里拉夫黑 德上將簽署了一份機密性備忘錄,啟動由海、空軍共同開發的「海空整體作戰 (ASB)」。 二、2010年2月,美國國防部發布的《四年國防總檢報告》正式確認「海空整體作戰 (ASB)」聯合作戰新概念,並已授權美國海、空軍加緊研究制定相應的構想和計 畫,「海空整體作戰(ASB)」已成為當前和未來美軍建設和作戰的重點。 三、隨著先進軍事技術的發展和中共軍隊「反介入(A2)」和「區域拒止(AD)」能力的 增強,美軍在西太平洋地區軍力投射的能力,開始受到強力的挑戰,中共竭盡所 能設法在第二島鏈建立「禁入區」。未來美軍如果不採取措施反制中共軍事能 力,美軍在西太平洋行動的代價,可能急劇上升,到達令美軍望而卻步的程度。 四、美軍強調要充分利用在航空、航太、網路、電子等技術方面的壟斷優勢,以關島 和日韓等盟國後勤基地為依托,以海空力量為主,聯合構成一個以天基系統、空 基平台和海基平台構成多層次立體作戰體系,在全維空間內加速實現其各種作戰 力量的有效結合。 五、「海空整體作戰(ASB)」的目的,乃為維持軍事平衡,展示美軍具備擊敗中共「反 介入(A2)」和「區域拒止(AD)」的戰略能力,從而使難以想像的中美軍事衝突永 遠成為不可能。
Abstract 1. 2009 In September, the U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff Norton. Schwartz and the U.S. Navy CNO Admiral Gary. Roughead will be the signing of a memorandum of confidentiality, initiated by the Navy to develop a new space concept of operations, the "AirSea battle." 2. 2010 In February, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced the new version. "Defense Review Report of four years" official confirmation "of the joint AirSea battle the new concept of operations, and has authorized the Navy to intensify research to develop the U.S. space theory and the corresponding total painting," AirSea battle "has become current and futureuse of U.S. military construction and operations focus. 3. With the proliferation of advanced military technology and the Chinese military "anti-access and area denial" capabilities, the U.S. military in the western Pacific the ability of the power delivery began to be a strong challenge. Chinese military has been trying to build in the second island chain "anti-access", if you do not take steps to offset the effect of the Chinese army military construction, the U.S. military costs in the Western Pacific operations, could move sharply up to prohibitive levels. 4. The U.S. military stressed the need to make good use of aerospace technology, network technology, electronics technology, new materials, technology and other aspects of the monopoly advantages to Guam and Japan and South Korea and other allies in the combat and logistic base, the naval and air forces to constitutes a main joint space-based system as the core, the space-based platforms, space-based platforms and sea-based platform consisting of three-dimensional multi-level combat system, in the full-dimensional space to accelerate the effective integration of combat forces. 5. "AirSea battle" for the purpose of maintaining a military balance, showing the U.S. military have defeated "anti-access" and "area denial" strategic capability, making it difficult to imagine the U.S. military conflicts never become impossible.
期刊論文
1.陳黎(2010)。美國以中共為假想敵的「海空作戰」概念。新時代國防,2010(10月號),12-17。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭光謙(2004)。美國軍事戰略的理論基礎。外國軍事學術,2004(3),4。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.呂德宏(2008)。從思想到行動--解讀美軍戰略規劃。長征出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Krepinevich, Andrew、Watts, Barry、Work, Robert(2003)。Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge。Washington, DC:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments。  new window
3.鈕先鍾(1998)。戰略研究入門。臺北:麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Snyder, Glenn H.(1961)。Deterrence and Defense。Princeton, N. J.:Princeton University Press。  new window
5.Krepinevich, Andrew F.(2010)。Why Air-Sea Battle?。Washington, DC:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments。  new window
6.Gunzinger, Mark A.(2010)。Sustaining America's Strategic Advantage in Long-Range Strike。Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments。  new window
7.Work, Robert O.、Ehrhard, Thomas P.。The Unmanned Combat Air System Carrier Demonstration Program: A New Dawn for Naval Aviation?。Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments。  new window
8.Work, Robert O.、Ehrhard, Thomas P.(2008)。Range, Persistence, Stealth, and Networking: The Case for a Carrier-Based Unmanned Combat Air System。Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments。  new window
9.van Tol, Jan、Gunzinger, Mark Alan、Krepinevich, Andrew F.、Thomas, Jim(2010)。Airsea battle: A point-of-departure operational concept。Washington, DC:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments。  new window
10.茲比格鈕.布林津斯基、中共國際問題研究所(2007)。大棋局:美國的首要地位及其地緣戰略。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.The Final Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel(2010)。The QDR in Perspective: Meeting America's National Security Needs In the 21st Century。Washington, DC:United States Institute of Peace。  new window
其他
1.(20101216)。美軍展現「海空作戰」新概念,http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/Navigator.aspx?ID=CJFD, 2011/04/07。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉子編(20100818)。美軍著眼對華海空作戰,http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/Navigator.aspx?ID=CJFD。  延伸查詢new window
3.韋取名(20101122)。海空作戰:美軍針對中共開發的新作戰概念,http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/Navigator.aspx?ID=CJFD。  延伸查詢new window
4.樊高月(20100729)。美軍「海空作戰」意在中共,http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/Navigator_aspx?ID=CJFD。  延伸查詢new window
5.雷紅偉,桑士川(2011)。美軍「海空作戰」--西太平洋上的未來聯合作戰,http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/Navigator_aspx?ID=CJFD。  延伸查詢new window
6.張伶(2011)。美軍「海空作戰」並非伴風起舞,http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/Navigator.aspx?ID=CJFD。  延伸查詢new window
7.Miles, Donna(20100607)。Defense Leaders Laud Air-Sea Battle Concept Initiative,American Forces Press Service。,http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=59527。  new window
8.U. S. Department of Defense。Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2010,http://www.defense.gov/qdr/qdr%20as%20oP/o2029janl0%201600.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top