:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鹿特丹規則對海上貨物運送人責任之影響
書刊名:運輸計劃
作者:張志清 引用關係李佳逸 引用關係王穆衡
作者(外文):Chang, Chih-chingLi, Marie Chia-yiWang, Mu-han
出版日期:2011
卷期:40:4
頁次:頁395-422
主題關鍵詞:海商法海上貨物運送契約多式聯運鹿特丹規則海牙威士比規則Maritime lawCarriage of goods by seaMultimodal transportRotterdam rulesHague-visby rules
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:122
本文分析鹿特丹規則與我國海商法對海上貨物運送人責任規範之主要 差異,包括:運送人強制責任期間、運送人基本義務、免責事由、舉證責 任、單位責任限制、貨損通知、訴訟時效及其他規範,並探討此等差異對 海上及多式聯運運送義務及責任之影響。鹿特丹規則將其適用範圍擴大至 海運加其他模式 (maritime plus),並修正運送人基本義務及其他義務、採完 全過失責任制修訂其法定免責事由、明文規範舉證責任次序及內容、提高 託運人義務及責任、擴大對運輸文件之規範 (含電子運輸紀錄)、明定契約 權利之轉讓及貨物交付規則、對無單放貨特別規定、新增「批量契約」規 定、修正貨損通知期限及訴訟時效等。此等變革之目的在解決海上貨物運送及多式聯運所面臨之國際立法多元化及分歧的困擾。惟其修正範圍較 廣,對船貨雙方權利義務關係之影響甚大,故本文亦探討鹿特丹規則對上 述議題的適用問題,並提出我國未來是否據以修法之考慮因素,期能提供 主管機關參考。
This article analyzes different rules provided in the Rotterdam Rules and the ROC Maritime Law, respectively, including the carrier’s period of responsibility, statutory obligations, exemptions, burden of proof, limitation of liability, notice of damage or loss, limitation of action and other related rules, and further explores the overall impacts on maritime and multimodal transport. The Rotterdam Rules as a whole have extended their scope of application to “maritime plus.” They have also revised the carriers’ fundamental obligations (e.g. provision of seaworthy ships, and duty of care), modified the statutory exemptions according to a full fault-based liability system, specified the contents of burden-of-proof, revised the contents of carriers’ liabilities, increased the duty of shippers, expanded the regulations of transport documents (e.g. electronic transport records), enumerated the rights of control of goods, as well as rules on cargo delivery, amended the special requirements on releasing goods without the production of a bill of landing, added in new rules on volume contract, and rectified the time for both the notice of cargo damage and limitation of action. The above mentioned modifications aim to resolve problems arising from the discrepancy of various international conventions on maritime and multimodal transport; however, it is also needed to take into account that such wide range of revision may well have great impact on both carriers and cargo owners in practice. To this end, this article continues to discuss potential problems on the application of the Rotterdam Rules, and further proposes suggestions for the authorities’ reference in future domestic laws revision tasks.
期刊論文
1.張志清(20020600)。由法律觀點論電子載貨證券作業方式及可行性。運輸計劃,31(2),451-474。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Asariotis, Regina(2008)。Burden of Proof and Allocation of Liability for Loss Due to a Combination of Causes Under the New Rotterdam Rules。Journal of International Maritime Law,14(6),537-543。  new window
3.張志清(2001)。複合運送與轉船運送責任研究。海運研究學刊,11,97-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張志清、林財生、陳福照、連義堂(2006)。際海商立法多元化趨勢下對多式聯運載貨證券條款之建議。航運季刊,15(4),1-22。  延伸查詢new window
5.張永堅(2010)。如何評價鹿特丹規則。中國海商法年刊,21(1),15-25。  延伸查詢new window
6.Girvin, S.(2008)。Exclusions and Limitation of Liability。Journal of International Maritime Law,14(6),524-536。  new window
7.Thomas, D. R.(2008)。An Appraisal of the Liability Regime Established under the New UN Convention。Journal of International Maritime Law,14(6),496-509。  new window
8.Mukherjee, P. K.、Bal, A. B.(2000)。A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Volume Contract Concept under the Rotterdam Rules: Selected Issues in Perspective。Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce,40,579-607。  new window
9.Carlson, M. H.(2007)。U.S. Participation in the International Unification of Private Law: The Making of the UNCITRAL Draft Carriage of Goods by Sea Convention。Tulane Maritime Law Journal,31(2),615-637。  new window
學位論文
1.吳幸樺(2010)。鹿特丹規則對海上貨物運送人責任之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.曾國雄、張志清(2008)。海商法。臺北市:航貿文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Boyd, S. C.(1996)。Scrutton on Charterparties and Bills of Lading。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
3.Baatz, Y.(2009)。The Rotterdam Rules- A Prtactical Annotation。London。  new window
4.劉宗榮(1991)。論多式聯運經營人責任制度及其影響。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.施智謀(1978)。海商法專題研究。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Wilson, J. F.(2004)。Carriage uf Goods by Sea。London。  new window
7.Schmittohoff, C. M.、Goode, R. M.(1989)。International Carriage of Goods: Some Legal Problems and Possible Solutions。London。  new window
其他
1.The CMI international Working Group on the Rotterdam Rules(2009)。Questions and Answers on The Rotterdam Rules,http://www.comitemaritime.org/。  new window
2.UNCTAD(2011)。Review of Maritime Transport 2011,Geneva Switzerland。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE