臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Second Language Proficiency Levels and Learning Strategy Uses in Persuasive Writing Tasks
書刊名：靜宜語文論叢
作者：高千文 引用關係／楊淑萍
作者(外文)：Kao, Chian-wen／Yang, Shu-ping
出版日期：2011
卷期：5:1
頁次：頁89-124
主題關鍵詞：說服性寫作；技專院校；學習策略；Persuasive writers；Technological college students；Learning strategy uses
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:48
本研究目的旨在以量化與質化的方式探討高成就與低成就的寫作學習者在說服 性寫作任務之學習策略。五十五位技專院校主修英文的學生參與此項研究。本研究 編製一份問卷來瞭解受試者使用寫作學習策略之狀況。此外，亦進行結構式訪談及 文件分析。研究結果發現，由於高低成就的寫作學習者所使用的策略部分雷同，學 習策略之使用頻率並非區辨第二語言寫作學習者之適當指標。典型相關分析指出即 使高成就學習者相當高頻率地使用學習策略，其成就只表現在文法能力上。雖然有 些學習策略被高成就與低成就學習者頻繁地使用，高成就學習者仍然在策略的運用 上較低成就學習者來得有效率。再者，有效率的策略使用者大部分其說服性寫作表 現較優。研究結論為學習策略的使用應偏重於效率而非頻率。本研究建議說服性寫 作教學應搭配策略訓練來提升學生第二語言寫作能力。
The purpose of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively explore the difference between high-achieving and low-achieving persuasive writers’ strategy uses in Taiwan. Fifty five technological college students majoring in English participated in this study. A questionnaire designed by the current study was used to elicit their learning strategy uses. Besides, semi-structured interviews as well as text analyses were conducted. Results indicated that the frequency of learning strategies is not an appropriate indicator to differentiate high-achieving from low-achieving writers since there was an overlap between high-achieving and low-achieving writers’ strategy uses. In addition, the analysis of canonical correlation revealed that even though high-achieving writers frequently used strategies, the beneficial effects just showed in their linguistic competence. Although some strategies were frequently used by high-achieving and low-achieving writers, high-achieving ones’ strategy uses were still qualitatively better than low-achieving ones’. Furthermore, effective strategy users generally performed better in persuasive writings than ineffective ones. It is concluded that students should realize how effectively instead of how frequently strategies should be used. Persuasive writing instruction integrated with sophisticated strategy training should be called for.
期刊論文
1.Magogwe, J. M.、Oliver, R.(2007)。The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana。System，35(3)，338-352。  new window
2.劉顯親(20080600)。An Overview of EFL Writing Research in Taiwan。英語教學，32(2)，1-37。new window  new window
3.陳一菁(20051200)。The Research History and Trend of Language Learning Strategies。朝陽人文社會學刊，3(2)，57-98。new window  new window
4.Bermudez, A. B.、Prater, D. L.(1990)。Using brainstorming and clustering with LEP writers to develop elaboration skills。TESOL Quarterly，24(3)，523-528。  new window
5.Connor, U.(1990)。Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive students writing。Research in the teaching of English，24(1)，67-87。  new window
6.Victori, M.(1999)。An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers。System，27(4)，537-555。  new window
7.McDonough, S. H.(1999)。Learner strategies。Language Teaching，32(1)，1-18。  new window
8.Lam, W.、Wong, J.(2000)。The effects of strategy training on developing discussion skills in an ESL classroom。ELT Journal，54(3)，245-255。  new window
9.Khamkhien, A.(2010)。Factors affecting language learning strategy reported usage by Thai and Vietnamese EFL Learners。Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching，7(1)，66-85。  new window
10.Oxford, Rebecca、Crookall, David(1989)。Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues。The Modern Language Journal，73(4)，404-419。  new window
11.Ehrman, Madeline E.、Leaver, Betty Lou、Oxford, Rebecca L.(2003)。A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning。System，31(3)，313-330。  new window
12.Graham, S.、MacArthur, C.、Schwartz, S.、Voth, T.(1992)。Improving the compositions of students with learning disabilities using a strategy involving product and process goal setting。Exceptional Children，58，322-335。  new window
13.Park, Gi-Pyo(1997)。Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean University students。Foreign Language Annals，30(2)，211-221。  new window
14.Vann, Roberta J.、Abraham, Roberta G.(1990)。Strategies of Unsuccessful Language Learners。TESOL Quarterly，24(2)，177-198。  new window
15.Wharton, Glenn(2000)。Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore。Language Learning，50(2)，203-243。  new window
16.Sheorey, R.(1999)。An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English。System，27(2)，173-190。  new window
17.Oxford, Rebecca L.、Green, John M.(1995)。A Closer Look at Learning Strategies, L2 Proficiency, and Gender。TESOL Quarterly，29(2)，261-297。  new window
18.Crowhurst, M.(1991)。Interrelationships between reading and writing persuasive discourse。Research in the Teaching of English，25(3)，314-338。  new window
19.Huang, S. C.(2008)。Assessing motivation and learning strategies using the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in a foreign language learning context。Social Behavior and Personality，36(4)，529-534。  new window
20.Larios, J.R.、Manchón, R.、Murphy, L.、Marín, J.(2008)。The foreign language writer's strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes。Journal of Second Language Writing，27(1)，30-47。  new window
21.Petric, B.、Czarl, B.(2003)。Validating a writing strategy questiormaixe。System，31，187-215。  new window
22.Rodd-Boyd, T. M.、Slater, W. H.(1989)。The effects of audience specification on undergraduates' attitudes, strategies, and writing。Research in the Teaching of English，23(1)，77-103。  new window
23.Lei, X.(2008)。Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: mediated actions in writing activities。Journal of Second Language Writing，27(4)，217-236。  new window
24.Wu, R.W.(2008)。An investigation of the relationships between strategy use and GEPT test performance。English Teaching & Learning，32(3)，35-69。  new window
會議論文
1.Tsai, H.M.(2009)。Examining metacognitive performance between skilled and unskilled writers in an integrated EFL writing class。Taiwan。678-689。  new window
2.Li, Y. H.、You, Y. L.(2005)。Exploring EFL writers' self-regulation during composing process。Taiwan。237-249。  new window
3.Lin, Y. T.、You, Y. L.(2006)。Investigating experienced and less experienced EFL writers' metacognitive knowledge of English writing。Taiwan。490-502。  new window
4.You, Y. L.、Joe, S. G.(2006)。A study of EFL writers' performance of reading to write task。Taiwan。608-620。  new window
5.Chen, J. L.、Hsu, Y.P.(2010)。Recursive writing: an in-depth study of EFL college student writers。Taiwan。112-119。  new window
6.Chuang, Y. H.、Joe, S. G.(2006)。Applying semantic mapping in EFL writing instruction。Taiwan。359-370。  new window
學位論文
1.Tsai, H. L.(2004)。Investigating the Relationships between ESL Writers' Strategy Use and Their Second Language Writing Ability，New York, United States。  new window
2.陳若翎(2010)。An Exploration of EFL College Students’ Writing Process: The Interactions Among Task Type, Writing Proficiency, and Writing Strategy(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  new window
3.邱怡慧(2006)。探討五位台灣新進學者英文論文書寫之寫作過程與研究報告引言分析(博士論文)。淡江大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Shields, R. N.(2000)。Writing Strategies as Predictors of Student Scores on the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment Writing Test，ennsylvania, United States。  new window
5.Victori, M.(1995)。EFL Writing Knowledge and Strategies: An Integrative Study，Spain。  new window
6.Song, S. Y.(2001)。The Effects of Reasoning Skills on Vocational Educational Students ' English Writing，Yunlin County, Taiwan, R.O.C.。  new window
圖書
1.Aspinall, P.、Allsop, J.(1998)。Practice tests for the Cambridge Business English Certificate Level One。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Tompkins, G. E.(2004)。Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Pearson Education。  new window
3.Bachman, Lyle F.(2004)。Statistical Analysis for Language Assessment。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Wortzel, R.(1979)。Multivariate analysis。New Jersey：Prentice Hall。  new window
5.Cohen, A. D.(1998)。Strategies in learning and using a second language。London：New York：Longman：Addison Wesley Longman Limited。  new window
6.Oxford, Rebecca L.(1990)。Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know。Newbury House。  new window
7.O'Malley, Joseph Michael、Chamot, Anna Uhl(1990)。Learning strategies in second language acquisition。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Dreyer, C.、Oxford, R. L.(1996)。Learning strategies and other piedictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa。Language Learning Strategies around the World: Cross-Cultural Perspectives。Hawaii。  new window
9.Zheng, D. Y.(2006)。The connotation of business English。Proceedings of 2006 The Dialogue between English Teaching and Learning。Taiwan。  new window
其他
1.Cohen, A.(2003)。Strategy Training for Second Language Learners，http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/0302cohen.html， 20081203。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：646（臺灣：639，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2564847 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68366305
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上