臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際刑事司法於轉型社會的功能
書刊名：國家發展研究
作者：陳貞如 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chen-ju
出版日期：2012
卷期：11:2
頁次：頁1-39
主題關鍵詞：國際刑事法院；國際刑法；轉型社會；刑事司法；International Criminal Court；International criminal law；Transitional society；Criminal justice
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:50
本文著重於探討國際刑事司法於轉型社會中可以發揮的功能，首先分析國際刑事司法體系之發展歷程和基本目的，再探討其衍生之功能，以促進大眾對於國際刑事司法的尊重與信賴。國際刑事司法若能獲得實踐，則可藉由審判達到政治和解與法治形成，促進和平與社會發展。然而，這是理想面的判斷，現實面的實踐仍可能受限於各國國情不同，國際法院效力難伸，而使得理想難以達成，而如何克服這些困難，則仍須更多國際社會之間的合作與努力。
Since the late 19th century, international criminal justice has developed to a significant degree, from ad hoc international criminal tribunals to a permanent international criminal court, in order to prosecute the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2003 can be seen as a milestone in the development of international criminal justice. The fundamental objectives of this development are to achieve justice for all, end impunity, help end conflicts, remedy the deficiencies of ad hoc tribunals, take over when national criminal justice institutions are unwilling or unable to act, and deter future war criminals. International criminal justice can play a particularly significant role in transitional societies, where it can help to bring about political reconciliation, advance the rule of law, build peace and foster the development of civil society. This article aims to clarify the function of international criminal justice in transitional societies. It discusses the development and the rules and statutes of ad hoc tribunals and the ICC and examines relevant international political declarations. It concludes that while international criminal justice has its limits, it can form a mutually reinforcing relationship with peace and development.
期刊論文
1.Ascensio, H.(1996)。The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTY。Leiden Journal of International Law，9(2)，467-478。  new window
2.Blattmann R.、Bowman, K.(2008)。Achievements and Problems of the International Criminal Court: a View from with。J.LCJ.，6(4)，711-730。  new window
3.Clark, Janine N.(2011)。Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court: Imitations and Possibilities。Journal of International Criminal Justice，9(3)，521-545。  new window
4.Galbraith, J.(2009)。The Pace of International Criminal Justice。M.J.LL，31，79-153。  new window
5.Govier, T.、Verwoerd, W.(2002)。Trust and the Problem of National Reconciliation。Philosophy of the Social Sciences，32(2)，178-205。  new window
6.Stromseth, J,(2009)。Justice on the Ground: Can International Criminal Courts Strengthen Domestic Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Societies?。Hague Journal on the Rule of Law，1(1)，87-97。  new window
7.Teitel, Ruti G.(2003)。Transitional Justice in a New Era. Symposium: Transitional Justice - Northern Ireland and Beyond: Theoretical and International Frameworks。Fordham International Law Journal，26(1)，893-906。  new window
圖書
1.Cassese, A.(2008)。international Criminal Law。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Ackar, L.、Kadribasic, A.(2010)。International Journal of Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights。Berlin。  new window
3.Brouwer, A. L. M. de(2005)。Supranational Criminal Prosecution of Sexual Violence: The ICC and the Practice of the ICTY and the ICTR。Belgium。  new window
4.Brown, B. S.(2009)。International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)。Encyclopedia of Human Rights \\ Forsythe, David P. (ed.)。Oxford。  new window
5.Combs, N. A.(2010)。Fact-finding without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions。Cambridge。  new window
6.Dorronsoro, G.(2011)。Afghanistan: The Impossible Transition. The Carnegie Papers。Washington, D.C.。  new window
7.Fuller, L.L.(2001)。Human Interaction and the Law。The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L Fuller [rev. ed.] \\ Winston, Kenneth (ed.)。Portland, OR。  new window
8.Murphy, C.(2009)。Political Reconciliation and International Criminal Trials。International Criminal Law and Philosophy \\ May, Larry ; Hoskins, Zachary (eds.)。Cambridge。  new window
9.Murphy, C.(2010)。A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation。Cambridge。  new window
10.Roth, J.(2004)。Useless Experience: Its Significance for Reconciliation after Auschwitz。After-words: Post Holocaust Struggles with Forgiveness, Reconciliation, Justice \\ Patterson, David ; Roth, John K. (eds.)。Seattle。  new window
11.Seibert-Fohr, Anja(2012)。Amnesties。Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law \\ Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.)。Oxford。  new window
12.UN, Division for Public Economics and Public Administration(2000)。Financial Management in Transitional Economies。  new window
13.Wolfrum, R.(2012)。International Law of Cooperation。Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law \\ Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.)。Oxford。  new window
其他
1.International Center for Transitional Justice(2009)。What Is Transitional Justice?，https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Global-Transitional-Justice-2009-English.pdf。  new window
2.European Union, Countries。  new window
3.ICC。Outreach Report 2009, Public Information and Documentation Section, Outreach Unit。  new window
4.ICC。The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland signs an Agreement on the Enforcement of Sentences。  new window
5.Public Information Page of the ICTY website。  new window
6.Public Information Page of the International Criminal Court website, the States Parties to the Rome Statute。  new window
7.(1974)。Resolutions adopted by the General Assembly 3201 (S/VI), Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order. Adopted on 1 May 1974。  new window
8.(1993)。UN Security Council Resolution 827 (1993). Adopted by the Security Council at its 3217th meeting, on 25 May 1993。  new window
9.(1994)。UN Security Council, Resolution 955 (1994), Adopted by the Security Council at its 3453rd meeting, on 8 November 1994。  new window
10.(1994)。Rules of Procedure and Evidence, International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991. Adopted on 11 February 1994。  new window
11.(2000)。UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 1315 (2000) , 14 August 2000。  new window
12.(2004)。Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 24 August 2004。  new window
13.(2004)。Security Council Endorses Formation of Sovereign Interm Government in Iraq: Welcomes End of Occupation by 30 June, Democratic Elections by January 2005, Resolution 1546 (2004). Adopted Unanimously。  new window
14.(2007)。UN Security Council, Resolution 1757 (2007). Adopted by the Security Council at its 5685th meeting, on 30 May 2007。  new window
15.(2008)。Nuremberg Declaration on Peace and Justice, 13 June 2008。  new window
16.(2011)。Rules of Procedure and Evidence, International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hammer, T.(2003)。Introduction。Youth unemployment and social exclusion in Europe: A comparative study。UK：The policy press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：859（臺灣：839，外國：20） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2432875 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68237865
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上