:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響技術移轉訂價之關鍵因素--以國內濺鍍靶材為例
書刊名:管理與系統
作者:胡宜中 引用關係蕭羽辰
作者(外文):Hu, Yi-chungHsiao, Yu-chen
出版日期:2012
卷期:19:3
頁次:頁527-560
主題關鍵詞:技術移轉訂價濺鍍靶材技術網路分析程序法模糊乘法偏好關係模糊加法偏好關係Technology transfer pricingSputtering targetAnalytic network processANPFuzzy multiplicative preference relationsFuzzy additive preference relations
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
半導體及光電產業為推動台灣經濟發展的核心產業,其中的關鍵性材料薄膜濺鍍靶材佔生產成本一半以上。隨著其應用領域不斷的擴展,濺鍍靶材之種類及使用量也隨之增加。若國內中下游產業能夠技轉靶材技術製造方法,能帶動國內靶材產業且降低生產成本。靶材技術移轉伴隨著技術價格之訂定。技術提供者以及接受者會分別就其所重視之因素進行交易談判。若雙方了解彼此所重視之因素,有助於縮短雙方對於價格訂定之差距。故本研究建立影響靶材技術訂價因素之研究架構,並探討其中技術提供者及接受者雙方所重視之關鍵因素。本研究建構網路層級架構以反應因素間相互影響之狀況,並使用網路分析程序法中的成對比較進行重要性評估。但傳統成對比較中使用的九點尺度語意值無法顯示受訪者的主觀認知,且成對比較通常有不一致性的現象產生。針對前者我們使用模糊數表達每一個語意值,針對後者則以乘法遞移性為基礎,提出具一致性之模糊乘法偏好關係;另以加法遞移性為基礎,產生具一致性之模糊加法偏好關係。研究結果顯示,技術提供者認為影響訂價最重要之關鍵因素為技術被模仿的容易程度、革新速率以及複雜程度。而技術接受者則認為技術接受者運用技術能力、技術被模仿的容易程度與革新速率為關鍵因素。表示買賣雙方皆重視技術是否具競爭能力。
The semiconductor and the electro-optical industries are the core industries that promote the economic development in Taiwan. One of the crucial materials is the thin film sputtering target, and this material has occupied the production cost for more than 50%. As the application field of sputtering continues to expand, the types of the sputtering targets and the amount of using these also increase. If domestic midstream and downstream industries can transfer the technology of manufacture method of targets, it will push forward the domestic target industry and decrease the cost of productions. Transferring the technology of target depends on the technology pricing. According to each side's favored factors, the technology providers and acceptors will carry on the transaction negotiations. If both sides could understand the valued factors of the other side, it will help to shorten the cognitive pricing gap between the providers and the acceptors. Therefore, this study builds the framework of pricing factors of target. Furthermore, it probes into the key factors which the technology providers and acceptors valued at respectively. To reflect the real condition between the factors and sub-factors, this study constructs the hierarchical framework network. Moreover, by using the pair-wise comparison from the analytic network process (ANP), this study evaluates the importance of each factor and sub-factor. However, the traditional nine points scales of linguistic values in pair-wise comparison could not show the subjective cognitive of the survey candidates. In addition, it usually results in the inconsistency. To solve the former problem, we use the fuzzy number to express each linguistic value; to solve the latter problem, we create the fuzzy multiplicative preference relations with consistency base on the multiplicative transitivity. What's more, base on the additive transitivity, we bring the fuzzy additive preference relations with consistency. The result of this research shows that the technology providers consider that the key factors of pricing in technology of targets transfer are the degree of copying, the rate of innovation, and the complex degree. On the other hand, the technology acceptors believe that the key factors of this process are the ability of using technology, the degree of copying, and the rate of innovation. Thus, it indicates that both the sellers and buyers pay attention to whether the technology possesses competitive ability.
期刊論文
1.Chang, D. Y.(1996)。Theory and Methodology Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP。European Journal of Operational Research,95(3),649-655。  new window
2.曾國雄、謝嘉鴻、黃明居(2007)。模糊AHP與非加法型模糊積分法於工程承包廠商評選之研究。科技管理學刊,12(1),29-54。  延伸查詢new window
3.Promentilla, Michael Angelo B.、Furuichi, T.、Ishii, K.、Tanikawa, N.(2008)。A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process for Multi-criteria Evaluation of Contaminated Site Remedial Countermeasures。Journal of Environmental Management,88(3),479-495。  new window
4.Chiu, Y. J.、Chen, Y. W.(2007)。Using AHP in Patent Valuation。Mathematical and Computer Modelling,46(7/8),1054-1062。  new window
5.Herrera-Viedma, E.、Herrera, F.、Chiclana, F.、Luque, M.(2004)。Some Issues on Consistency of Fuzzy Preference Relations。European Journal of Operational Research,154(1),98-109。  new window
6.Lee, E. S.、Li, R.-J.(1988)。Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events。Computers and Mathematics with Applications,15(10),887-896。  new window
7.何敬之、藍筱蘋、劉仁智(19950300)。多評準則決策--分析層級程序法尺度之研究。管理科學學報,12(1),127-152。  延伸查詢new window
8.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
9.Chen, Mei-Fang、Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung、Ding, Cherng G.(2008)。Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives。Applied Soft Computing,8(1),110-117。  new window
10.Lee, Amy H. I.、Wang, Wei-Ming、Lin, Tsai-Ying(2010)。An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry。Technological Forecasting and Social Change,77(1),135-150。  new window
11.Wang, Tien-Chin、Chen, Yueh-Hsiang(2008)。Applying Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations to the Improvement of Consistency of Fuzzy AHP。Information Sciences,178(19),3755-3765。  new window
12.黃欽河(2008)。國防硏發成果跨步走--專利專屬授權成功經驗分享。新新季刊,36(3),132-136。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉江彬、張孟元(2002)。技術及專利價値評估模式之硏究。台大管理論叢,13(1),37-84。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉宗燁(2006)。技術移轉中的技術鑑價。新新季刊,34(1),141-144。  延伸查詢new window
15.Branson, J.(1966)。Transfer of International Knowledge by International Corporation to Developing Countries。American Economic Review,56,259-267。  new window
16.McGavock, D. M.、Hass, D. A.、Patin, M. P.(1992)。Factors Affecting Royalty Rates。les NouveIles,27(2),107-116。  new window
17.Abdelkader, D.(1988)。The Management of Technology Transfer。View and Experiences of Developing Countries,3(1/2),149-165。  new window
18.Abdi, M. R.(2009)。Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Evaluating Reconfigurable Machines。Production Economics,117(1),1-15。  new window
19.Dagdeviren, M.、Yuksel, I.、Kurt, M.,(2008)。A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP) Model to Identify Faulty Behavior Risk (FBR) in Work System。Safety Science,46(5),771-783。  new window
20.Davies, H.(1977)。Technology Transfer through Commercial Transaction。Journal of industrial Economics,26(2),75-161。  new window
21.Kopits, G.(1976)。Intra-Firm Royalties Crossing Frontiers and Transfer-Pricing Behavior。The Economic Journal,86(12),791-805。  new window
22.Saad, M.、Cicmil, S.、Greenwood, M.(2002)。Technology Transfer Projects in Developing Countries: Furthering the Project Management perspectives。International Journal of Project Management,20(8),617-625。  new window
23.Sullivan, P. H.(1994)。Royalty Rates Conform to Industry Norm。les Nouvelles,29(3),140-146。  new window
24.Teece, D. J.(1977)。Technology Transfer by Multinational Firm: the Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How。The Economic Journal,87(346),242-261。  new window
學位論文
1.古光宏(1993)。技術移轉之價格模式分析。交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佳樺(2003)。影響技術授權價格因素之硏究--以製藥產業爲例。政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林雅棋(2001)。光儲存業(DVD)技術報酬金決定因素之實證硏究。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.顏雅萍(1999)。技術移轉價格影響因素之實證硏究--以資訊電子業爲例。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Saaty, T. L.(2001)。Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process: The organization and prioritization of complexity。RWS Publications。  new window
2.鄧振源(2005)。計畫評估:方法與應用。國立臺灣海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.白木靖寬、吉田貞史(2006)。薄膜工程學。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bidault F.(1989)。Technology Pricing: From Principle to Strategy。ST。  new window
5.Arnold, T.(1988)。100 Factors Involved in Pricing the Technology License。In Licensing Law Handbook。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE