:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論C2C網路拍賣服務提供者之商標間接侵權責任
書刊名:東吳法律學報
作者:黃心怡 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Serena Shin-yi
出版日期:2012
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁83-126
主題關鍵詞:網路拍賣服務提供者商標侵權商標間接侵權輔助侵權責任電子商務指令智慧財產權執行指令代負責任億貝Online auction service providerOnline auction houseTrademark infringementSecondary trademark infringementContributory liabilityVicarious liabilityE-commerce directiveIPR enforcement directiveeBay
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:31
自2004年以來,拍賣網路服務提供者龍頭大老eBay,於美歐各地就其網站上發生之商標侵權行為陸續遭商標權人提起訴訟,請求eBay負民事損害賠償責任。美歐各國基於法令規範之不同,對於eBay應否負損害賠償責任,有相當紛歧之見解。本文擬從美國相關法制與代表性判決Tiffany(NJ)Inc. v. eBay Inc.,以及歐盟2000年電子商務指令(Directive 2000/31/EC, E-Commerce Directive)和2004年智慧財產權執行指令(Directive 2004/48/EC, IPR Enforcement Directive)之規定,與英國及歐盟法院對於L'Oréal v. eBay之二則判決,討論有關拍賣網站服務提供者間接侵權責任之原理原則,尋找出判決中共同之思維脈絡及考量因素。並從我國現行相關法律規定及司法實務見解,分析類似案件之可能審理結果。再參酌外國法制之思維脈絡,就我國之法制提出修法建議。
Since 2004, eBay has been sued by various famous trademark owners for secondary trademark infringement occurred on its auction websites in United States and European countries. The courts in different countries reached different decisions on the secondary trademark liability of eBay. This paper discusses the principles and factors to be concerned in secondary trademark liability by analyzing three leading cases: Tiffany (NH) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2nd Cir. 2010), L'Oréal v. eBay, [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch), and L'Oréal v. eBay, Case C-324/09 L'Oréal v. eBay [2011] ECR I-0000, together with two EC directives: Directive 2000/31/EC, E-Commerce Directive and Directive 2004/48/EC, IRP Enforcement Directive.This paper also proposes some amendments to R.O.C. Trademark Act after analyzing current R.O.C. Trademark Act, R.O.C. Copyright Act and relevant court decisions and making comparisons with above-mentioned cases and EC directives.
期刊論文
1.Bernstein, David H.、Potenza, Michael R.(2011)。Why the Reasonable Anticipation Standard Is the Reasonable Way to Assess Contributory Trademark Liability in the Online Marketplace。STAN. TECH. L. REV.,9,9-29。  new window
2.Cross, John T.(1994)。Contributory Infringement and Related Theories of Secondary Liability for Trademark Infringement。Iowa Law Review,80,101-156。  new window
3.Lerner, Todd Evan(2010)。Playing the Blame Game, Online: Who is Liable When Counterfeit Goods are Sold Through Online Auction Houses?。PACE INT'L L. REV.,22,241-267。  new window
4.Weckström, Katja(2012)。Liability for Trademark Infringement for Internet Service Providers。MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV.,16,1-50。  new window
5.林誠二(2009)。代負責任及與有過失間之關連性。台灣法學雜誌,127,161-164。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王澤鑑、林利芝、許忠信、楊秀儀、黃國昌、張文貞、李筱苹、陳肇鴻、廖元豪、簡資修、劉宏恩、呂紹凡(2010)。英美法導論。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.王澤鑑(2011)。侵權行為法。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭玉波、陳榮隆(2010)。民法債編總論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱聰智(200301)。新訂民法債篇通則。台北:元照出版有限公司:華泰文化事業股份有限公司:邱聰智。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃立(200611)。民法債編總論。臺北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.孫森焱(2012)。民法債編總論。孫森焱。  延伸查詢new window
7.林誠二(2010)。債法總論新解:體系化解說。瑞興圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.姚志明(2011)。侵權行為法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.鄭苑瓊(2009)。淺析Tiffany v. eBay案與網路服務提供者商標侵權責任爭議。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝國廉(2010)。網路服務提供者關於商標權侵害之民事責任--英美商標法實務之最新發展。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔣克齊(201107)。網路服務提供者商標侵權責任研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.賴靖基(201206)。探討網路購物平台提供者之商標侵權責任。  延伸查詢new window
5.Adams, Charles W.(2008)。Indirect Infringement from a Tort Law Respective。  new window
6.Goldwasser, Kate(2010)。Knock it off: An Analysis of Trademark Counterfeit Goods Regulation in the United States, France, and Belgium。  new window
7.Helman, Lital ; Parchomovsky, Gideon(2011)。The Best Available Technology Standard。  new window
8.Landes, William M. ; Posner, Richard A.(1988)。The Economics of Trademark Law。  new window
9.Leu, Michelle C.(2011)。Authenticate This Revamping Secondary Trademark Liability Standards to Address A Worldwide Web of Counterfeits。  new window
10.McKenna, Mark P.(2011)。Probabilistic Knowledge of Third-Party Trademark Infringement。  new window
11.Merges, Reobert P. ; Menell, Peter S. ; Lemley, Mark A.(2007)。Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age。  new window
12.Powell, Connie Davis(2011)。The eBay Exemption: Restructuring The Trademark Safe Harbor for Online Marketplaces。  new window
13.Rosenberg, Phillip A.(2009)。A Legislative Response to Tiffany v. eBay: In Search of An Online Commerce Certification Act (OCCA)。  new window
14.Saunders, Kurt M. ; Berger-Walliser, Gerlinde(2011)。The Liability of Online Markets for Counterfeit Goods: A Comparative Analysis of Secondary Trademark Infringement in The United States And Europe。  new window
15.Sunderji, Fara S.(2005)。Protecting Online Auction Sites from the Contributory Trademark Liability Storm: A Legislative Solution to the Tiffany Inc., v. eBay Inc. Problem。  new window
16.Varner, Elizabeth(2008)。Tiffany Inc. v. eBay, Inc.: Justice White’s Outdated Guide to Trademark Infringement Will Likely Result in Appeals。  new window
17.Welch, Virginia(2010)。Contributory Trademark Infringement: Who Bears The Burden Of Policing Online Counterfeit Activity?。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE