:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Patent Licensing and Double Marginalization in Vertically-related Markets
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:丁虹仁 引用關係高國峯 引用關係梁文榮 引用關係
作者(外文):Din, Hong-renKao, Kuo-fengLiang, Wen-jung
出版日期:2013
卷期:41:1
頁次:頁27-47
主題關鍵詞:垂直相關市場雙重邊際化產業外授權廠商固定權利金與單位權利金授權兩部授權Vertically-related marketsDouble marginalizationOutsider patenteeFixed-fee and royalty licensingTwo-part tariff
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:55
本文設立一個包括垂直相關市場的三階段賽局模型, 定義中間財價格為中間財獨占價格與其邊際成本的線性組合。本文主要在探討當產業外授權廠商授權給上游廠商時, 上游廠商的獨占力程度在最適授權策略的決策中所扮演的角色。本文發現當上游廠商的獨佔力相對小 (大) 時, 無論創新程度 (innovation size) 為何, 最適授權策略為單位權利金授權 (固定權利金授權)。其次, 本文發現提高雙重邊際化程度, 可藉由為產業外授權廠商的授權策略由單位權利金授權變成固定權利金授權, 提升社會福利水準。再者, 本文証明當創新程度夠大時, 即使完全消除雙重邊際化, 社會福利水準仍維持不變。最後, 本文也考慮了兩部授權策略下的最適授權策略與其對社會福利的影響。
This paper develops a three-stage model in which the input price is expressed by a combination of its monopoly input price and marginal cost. The focus of this paper is on the role of the upstream firm in terms of the degree of its monopoly power in the choice of the outsider patentee's optimal licensing contract, as the outsider patentee licenses its innovation to the upstream firm. The paper shows that the outsider patentee prefers royalty (fixed-fee) licensing to fixed-fee (royalty) licensing when the degree of the upstream firm's monopoly power is small (large) regardless of the innovation size. This paper shows that a rise in the degree of double-marginalization may improve the social welfare through the outsider patentee's switching from royalty licensing to fixed-fee licensing. It also proves that social welfare remains unchanged by the elimination of double-marginalization when the innovation size is large. Finally, the paper is extended by taking into account a two-part tariff.
期刊論文
1.Faulí-Oller, Ramon、Sandonís, Joel(2002)。Welfare Reducing Licensing。Games and Economic Behavior,41(2),192-205。  new window
2.Mukherjee, A.、Ray, A.(2007)。Strategic outsourcing and R&D in a vertical structure。The Manchester School,75,297-310。  new window
3.Poddar, Sougata、Sinha, Uday Bhanu(2010)。Patent licensing from a high-cost firm to a low-cost firm。Economic Record,86(274),384-395。  new window
4.Faulí-Oller, R.、Sandonís, J.(2003)。To merger or to license: Implications for competition policy。International Journal of Industrial Organization,21,655-672。  new window
5.Kabiraj, T.(2004)。Patent licensing in a leadership structure。The Manchester School,72,188-205。  new window
6.Poddar, Sougata、Sinha, Uday Bhanu(2004)。On patent licensing in spatial competition。Economic Record,80=249,208-218。  new window
7.Rostoker, M.(1984)。A survey of corporate licensing。IDEA,24,59-92。  new window
8.Sinha, Uday B.(2010)。Strategic licensing, exports, FDI, and host country welfare。Oxford Economic Papers,62,114-131。  new window
9.Arya, A.、Mittendorf, B.(2006)。Enhancing vertical efficiency through horizontal licensing。Journal of Regulatory Economics,29,333-342。  new window
10.Kabiraj, Tarun、Marjit, Sugata(2003)。Protecting consumers through protection: The role of tariff-induced technology transfer。European Economic Review,47,113-124。  new window
11.Mukherjee, A.、Pennings, E.(2006)。Tariffs, licensing and market structure。European Economic Review,50(7),1699-1707。  new window
12.Kamien, M. I.、Oren, S. S.、Tauman, Y.(1992)。Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation。Journal of Mathematical Economics,21(5),483-508。  new window
13.Kamien, Morton I.、Tauman, Yair(1986)。Fees versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,101(3),471-492。  new window
14.Muto, S.(1993)。On Licensing Policies in Bertrand Competition。Games and Economic Behavior,5(2),257-267。  new window
15.Wang, X. Henry(1998)。Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model。Economics Letters,60(1),55-62。  new window
研究報告
1.Nadiri, M. I.(1993)。Innovations and technological spillovers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE