跨國公民政治研究與理論發展之反思__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	跨國公民政治研究與理論發展之反思
書刊名：	問題與研究
作者：	辛翠玲
作者(外文)：	Shin, Chueiling
出版日期：	2012
卷期：	51:3
頁次：	頁1-22
主題關鍵詞：	跨國公民政治；全球公民社會；跨國社會運動；跨國倡議網絡；跨國認證網絡；Transnational civil politics；Global civil society；Transnational social movement；Transnational advocacy network；Transnational certification network
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:21

跨國公民政治是國關學界在過去三十多年間開啟的新研究領域。數十年下來，學界已累積一定研究經驗與成果。為使本研究課題能更進一步深入發展，實有必要統整迄今之研究發現，有系統地了解與整理學界於此議題的發展軌跡，以便釐清其中的特點、突破與不足。本文主要目的有二，分析近年來跨國政治研究的發展脈絡，進而討論至今跨國公民政治研究的發現與局限。本研究認為，跨國公民政治研究，在研究方法上歷經多次的典範轉移，開啟不同的研究視角，不同階段的研究發現也使跨國公民政治的面貌得以逐漸地被清晰呈現。國關學界的跨國公民政治研究，在過去近四十年來的發展脈絡，第一代研究開啟了新的方法論；第二代研究則著眼於公民行為者作為國際政治能動者的身分，及其與環境結構的互動影響，跨國公民政治研究的基本學理架構也逐漸成型；第三代研究則轉向實證研究，進一步探索公民行為者之間的個別差異，並擷取跨學科的研究經驗，用以歸納並理解不同的跨國公民政治，並因此有三種主要的跨國公民政治理論：跨國社會運動論、跨國倡議網絡論、跨國認證網絡理論。三種理論各自著墨不同的跨國公民政治經驗，且有不同的研究發展。綜觀理論學界的耕耘，本研究並指出跨國政治研究也從純粹的國際關係領域，越來越朝向跨學科整合的方向發展。

以文找文

The field of transnational civil politics have been a rapidly developing research focus in the international relations scholarship, and impressive amounts of research findings have been published during the last few decades. It is essential to review and examine the systemic development of research in the academia. This paper aims to tackle the task by reviewing and analyzing the research path of transnational civil politics studies, hoping that the discussion will not only provide an overall historical analysis of the research development in the subject but offer perspectives on the future direction.This paper finds that there are three main stages of the research development, each with different research methodology, concerns and assumptions. The first stage highlights the emergence of transnational actors on the state-centric international politics and stimulates the growth of new methodology with non-state actors as the analytical unit. By contrast, the research focus of the second stage turns to the feasibility and possibility of transnational actors as agent in international politics. The third stage further examines the diversifies transnational actors and their different approaches as political agents. The paper concludes by suggesting that more interdisciplinary attempts are needed for further development of the research topic.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	金雪軍、王曉榮(2005)。自願勞工標準的現狀和發展：基於SA8000認證的經驗研究。中國工業經濟，8，89-96。延伸查詢
2.	Crabl, Richard E.、Vibbert, Steven L.(1985)。Vibbert, Managing Issues and Influencing Public Policy。Public Relations Review，11(2)，3-16。
3.	Escobar, Arturo(2001)。A brief response to Ray Kiely’s ‘Reply to Escobar’。Development，43(4)，11-14。
4.	Hainsworth, Brad E.(1990)。Issues Management: An Overview。Public Relations Review，16(1)，3-5。
5.	Hard, Michael(1995)。The Withering of Civil Society。Social Text，45，27-44。
6.	Keohan, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S.(1974)。Transnational Relations and International Organization。World Politics，27(1)，39-62。
7.	Lipschult, R. D.(1992)。Reconstructing World Politics: The Emergence of Global Civil Society。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，21(3)，389-420。
8.	Mantill, Giovanni(2009)。Emerging International Human Rights Norms for Transnational Corporations。Global Governance，15(2)，279-298。
9.	Pattberg, Philipp。The Institutionalization of Private Governance: Conceptualizing an Emerging Trend in Global Environmental Politics。Global Governance Working Paper，9，1-34。
10.	Schaller, Susanne(2007)。The Democratic Legitimacy of Private Governance: An Analysis of Ethical Trading Initiatives。INEF-Report，91。
11.	Shaw, Martin(1992)。Global Society and Global Responsibility: The Theoretical, Historical and Political Limits of ‘International Society’。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，21(3)，421-434。
12.	Smith, Gary、Muetzelfeldt, Michael(2000)。Global Governance and Strategies for Civil Society。Pacific Review，12(3)，265-279。
13.	Van Tuijl, Peter、Jordan, Lisa(2000)。Political Responsibility in Transnational NGO Advocacy。World Development，28(12)，2051-2065。
14.	Walker, R. B. J.(1994)。Social Movements/World Politics。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，23(3)，669-700。
15.	William, David、Young, Tom(1994)。Governance, the World Bank and Liberal Theory。Political Studies，42(1)，84-100。
16.	Martens, Kerstein(2001)。Applying the Concept of Political Opportunity Structures in European and International Studies。Transnational Associations，1，2-9。
17.	Diamond, Larry Jay(1994)。Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation。Journal of Democracy，5(3)，4-17。
18.	Cox, Robert W.(1981)。Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，10(2)，126-155。
19.	Rosenau, James N.(1995)。Governance in the Twenty-first Century。Global Governance，1(1)，13-43。
20.	Salamon, Lester M.(1994)。The Rise of the Nonprofit Sector。Foreign Affairs，73(4)，109-122。
21.	Smouts, Marie-Claude(1998)。The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations。International Social Science Journal，50(155)，81-89。
22.	Finnemore, Martha、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。International Norm Dynamics and Political Change。International Organization，52(4)，887-917。
23.	Sikkink, Kathryn(1993)。Human rights, principled issue-networks, and sovereignty in Latin America。International Organization，47(3)，411-441。

會議論文
1.	Cuninghame, P. C.(2008)。Whither autonomism as a global social movement。First ISA Forum of Sociology: Sociological Research and Public Debate。Spain：Barcelona。
2.	Smith, Jackie(2002)。Globalization and Transnational Social Movement Organization。The Conference on Struggles and Settlements in Organizations and Movements。USA：Michigan。
3.	Workman, Anna, Inside the Transnational Advocacy Network(2006)。Inside the Transnational Advocacy Network: Towards a Critical Politics of NGO Relations。The Conference of Human Rights amid Globalization。Germany：The Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Community。
4.	Noelke, Andreas、Graz, Jean-Christophe(2007)。Limits to the Legitimacy of Transnational Private Governance。CSGR/GARNET Conference。UK：University of Warwick。

研究報告
1.	The Commission on Global Governance(1995)。Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance。Oxford University Press。
2.	Scholte, Jan Aart(1999)。Global Civil Society: Changing the World?。UK：University of Warwick。

圖書
1.	Dorothy, Thomas Q.(1993)。Holding Governments Accountable by Public Pressure。Ours By Right : Women's Rights as Human Right。London and Atlantic Highland, N. J. and Ottawa：Zed Books。
2.	Geissel, Brigitte(2006)。Transnational Networks of Local and Global Civil Society as Response to New Challenges。World Society Focus Paper Series。Berlin：World Society Foundation。
3.	Howlet, M.、Ramesh, M.(1995)。Agenda Setting-Policy Determinants and Policy Windows。Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
4.	Keane, John(2004)。Violence and Democracy。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
5.	Mansbach, Richard W.、Ferguson, Yale H.、Lampert, Donald E.(1976)。The Web of World Politics: Non-State Actors in the Global System。Upper Saddle River, NJ。
6.	McAdam, Doug(2001)。Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly。Dynamics of Contention。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
7.	Munck, Ronaldo(2007)。Globalization and Contestation: The New Great Counter-movement。London：Routledge。
8.	Rosenau, James N.(1980)。The Study of Global Interdependence: Essays on the Transnationalization of World Affairs。London：Pinter。
9.	Amin, Samir(1977)。Imperialism and Unequal Development。New York, NY：Monthly Review Press。
10.	Macdonald, Laura(1997)。Supporting Civil Society: The Political Role of Non-Government Organizations in Central America。London, UK：Macmillan Press Ltd.。
11.	Risse, Thomas、Ropp, Stephen C.、Sikkink, Kathryn(1999)。The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change。Cambridge University Press。
12.	Guthman, Julie(2004)。Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California。Berkeley, California：University of California Press。
13.	Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1971)。Transnational Relations and World Politics。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
14.	Gilpin, Robert(1975)。U. S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment。New York, NY：Basic Books。
15.	Tarrow, Sidney(1998)。Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics。Cambridge University Press。
16.	Gill, Stephen(2003)。Power and resistance in the new world order。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。
17.	Strange, Susan、Stopford, John M.、Henley, John S.(1991)。Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares。Cambridge University Press。
18.	Goldstein, Judith、Keohane, Robert O.(1993)。Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change。Cornell University Press。
19.	Rosenau, James N.、Czempiel, Ernst-Otto、張勝軍等(1992)。沒有政府的治理。南昌：江西人民出版社。延伸查詢
20.	Gilpin, Robert(1981)。War and Change in World Politics。Cambridge University Press。
21.	Keck, Margaret E.、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics。Cornell University Press。
22.	Vernon, Raymond(1971)。Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U. S. Enterprises。Basic Books。
23.	Willets, Peter(1982)。Pressure Groups in the Global System。London：Pinter。

其他
1.	Chevriot, Roland(1972)。Letter to organic agriculture groups: Subject: Creation of an international，http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/inside_ifoam /pdfs/Founding—Letter.pdf， 20101101。

圖書論文
1.	Dian, Mario(2000)。The Concept of Social Movement。Readings in Contemporary Political Sociology。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。
2.	Khagra, Sanjeev、Alvord, Sarah(2006)。The Rise of Civic Transnationalism。Transnational Civil Society. An Introduction。Bloomfield, CT：Kumarian Press。
3.	Meyer, David S.、Tarrow, Sidney(1998)。A Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century。The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century。Rowman & Littlefield。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	人權力量今猶在？--螺旋模式與規範社會化的反思
2.	跨國政治又一章：跨國認證網絡的興起與問題

1.	中國大陸非政府組織與跨國倡議網絡：建構理論的觀點
2.	國際與在地非政府組織在緬甸合作模式之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	跨國政治又一章：跨國認證網絡的興起與問題

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫