:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Public Good Inputs, Housing Quality, and Locational Stratification
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:彭信坤 引用關係王平 引用關係余朝恩 引用關係
作者(外文):Peng, Shin-kunWang, PingYu, Chia-ming
出版日期:2013
卷期:41:2
頁次:頁195-217
主題關鍵詞:經濟分隔內生分類居住品質完全競爭空間均衡Economic segregationEndogenous sortingHousing qualityCompetitive spatial equilibrium
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:35
本文對經濟分隔相關文獻的貢獻在於強調對居住品質的偏好差異可以解釋區域分隔現象的產生。本文建構一內生分類(endogenous sorting)之一般均衡模型,兼以考量家戶在所得、通勤時間成本乃至於對居住品質偏好上的差異。居住品質受地方公共財投入內生影響,而地方公共財投入的規模又由所徵得的財產稅收入決定。本文找出完全競爭空間均衡的特徵條件,並進一步發現完全整合居住型態的出現需要參數滿足一測度為零的特定條件。換言之,一般而言均衡滿足區域分隔型態。當家戶在通勤成本上的差異遠大於其在居住品質偏好上的差異,均衡時所有富人居住在市中心,符合亞洲和歐洲的都會區分佈型態。反之則均衡時所有富人居住在市郊,符合美洲都會區的分佈型態。
Our paper contributes to the literature on economic segregation by showing that heterogeneity in preferences for housing quality as a result of the location-specific provision of public goods can generate locational stratification. We develop a general equilibrium framework of endogenous sorting in which agents are allowed to differ in their incomes, opportunity costs of commuting, and preferences for housing quality. Housing quality is endogenously determined by location-specific public infrastructure that is financed by property taxes. We characterize the configuration of the competitive spatial equilibrium. We find that complete integration arises only under a set of parameters of measure zero such that the ratio of the opportunity costs of commuting facing different types of agents is in a specific homothetic relation to the ratio of the marginal valuations of housing quality. By contrast, locational stratification is generic. When the difference between agents' commuting costs is sufficiently large (resp. small) compared to the difference in their respective preferences for housing quality, the equilibrium is segregated with all rich residing in the central city (resp. suburb) as observed in Asia and Europe (resp. U.S. metropolitan areas).
期刊論文
1.Lin, C.-C.、Mai, C.-C.、Wang, P.(2004)。Urban land policy and housing in an endogenously growing monocentric city。Regional Science and Urban Economics,34,241-261。  new window
2.Arnott, R.、Braid, R.、Davidson, R.、Pines, D.(1999)。A general equilibrium spatial model of housing qua1ity and quantity。Regional Science and Urban Economics,29,283-316。  new window
3.Arnott, R.、Davidson, R.、Pines, D.(1983)。Housing quality mamtenance and rehabilitation。Review of Economic Studies,50,467-494。  new window
4.Benabou, R.(1996)。Heterogeneity, stratifìcation and growth。American Economic Review,86,584-609。  new window
5.Benabou, R.(1996)。Equity and efficiency in human capital investment: The Local connection。Review of Economic Studies,63,237-264。  new window
6.Bergstrom, T.、Cornes, R.(1983)。Independence of allocative efficiency from distribution in the theory of public goods。Econometrica,51,1753-1765。  new window
7.Berliant, M.、Peng, S.-K.、Wang, P.(2006)。Welfare ana1ysis of the number and locations of local public facilities。Regional Science and Urban Economics,36,207-226。  new window
8.de Bartolome, C. A. M.、Ross, S. L.(2003)。Equilibria with local governments and commuting: Income sorting vs income mixing。Journal of Urban Economics,54(1),1-20。  new window
9.Greenhut, M. L.、Mai, C.-C.(1980)。Towards a general theory of public and private facility location。Annals of Regional Science,14,1-11。  new window
10.Hardman, A.、Ioannides, Y. M.(2004)。Neighbors' income distribution: Economic segregation and mixing in U.S. urban neighborhoods。Journal of Housing Economics,13,368-382。  new window
11.Hartwick, J.,、Schweizer, U.、Varaiya, P.(1976)。Comparative statics of a residential economy with several classes。Journal of Economic Theory,13,396-413。  new window
12.Jargowsky, P. A.(1996)。Take the money and run: Economic segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas。American Sociological Review,61(6),984-998。  new window
13.Peng, S.-K.、Wang, P.(2008)。Sorting by foot: Travel-for' local public good and equilibrium stratifìcation。Canadian Journal of Economics,38,1224-1252。  new window
14.Peng, S.-K.、Wang, P.(2009)。A normative analysis of housing-related tax policy in a general equilibrium model of housing quality and prices。Journal of Public Economic Theory,11(5),667-696。  new window
15.Sweeney, J. L.(1974)。Quality, commodity hierarchies, and housing markets。Econometrica,42(1),147-167。  new window
16.Thisse, J.-F.、Wildasin, D. E.(1992)。Public facility location and urban spatial structure: Equilibrium and welfare analysis。Journal of Public Economics,48,83-118。  new window
17.Tiebout, Charles M.(1956)。A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures。Journal of Political Economy,64(5),416-424。  new window
18.Romer, Paul M.(1986)。Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth。Journal of Political Economy,94(5),1002-1037。  new window
19.Lucas, Robert E. Jr.(1988)。On the Mechanics of Economic Development。Journal of Monetary Economics,22(1),3-42。  new window
20.Chen, B.-L.、Peng, S.-K.、Wang, P.(2009)。Intergenerational Human Capital Evolution, Local Public Good Preferences and Stratification。Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,33(3),745-757。  new window
研究報告
1.Bayer, P.、McMillan, R.、Rueben, K.(2004)。An equilibrium model of sorting in an urban housing market。  new window
2.Hanushek, E. A.、Yilmaz, K.(2007)。Schools and location: Tiebout, Alonso, and government policy。  new window
圖書
1.Steinberg, S.(1989)。The Ethnic Myth: Race, Ethnicity, and Class in America。Boston, MA:Beacon Press。  new window
2.Perlmann, J.(1988)。Ethnic Differences: Schooling and Social Structure Among the Irish, Italians, Jews, and Blacks in an American City, 1880-1935。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Glazer, Nathan、Moynihan, Daniel Patrick(1963)。Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City。Cambridge, MA:The M.I.T. Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE