資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.16.135.228)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Can an Individual Be Held Responsible for His/Her Own Personal (Moral) Character: How Moral Luck Challenges the Notion that Individuals Are Responsible for Their Own (Moral) Character
書刊名:
教育研究集刊
作者:
陳伊琳
作者(外文):
Chen, Yi-lin
出版日期:
2013
卷期:
59:3
頁次:
頁35-64
主題關鍵詞:
品格建構
;
品格責任
;
道德運氣
;
Character development
;
Responsibility for character
;
Moral luck
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:24
道德品格的建構向來被視為個體的責任,但在主體有意識地選擇成為什麼樣子的人以前,其道德品格似已受習慣養成、道德教養的影響,而大致成形。就此而言,我們如何能夠主張個體應為自身的道德品格負責?究竟在何種程度上,個體可為自身的道德品格承擔責任?本文即以「道德運氣」這個概念來指稱諸如外在環境、道德教養、個人稟賦等對道德品格的型塑具有實質影響力,但卻屬於個人自主控制能力以外的因素。道德運氣對於「品格建構之個體責任」的挑戰,當有助於釐清個體可為自身的道德品格負責的真正意涵與限度。明確而言,品格的建構既非為主體所能全然掌控,也非絲毫不受任何條件所囿限;品格建構本質上就是一種協同合作的事業,無法由主體單獨完成。最後,透過Aristotle關於自主性與責任的發展性觀點,可明確說明個體是如何擔負起品格建構的責任。
以文找文
It has long been an unwritten rule that individuals are responsible for the development of their personal moral character. However, the way in which people typically develop moral character is often the result of habits and moral upbringing, which are imposed before individuals start to shape their moral character by conscious effort. If this is the case, an individual should not be held completely responsible for his or her own moral character. This paper draws on the idea of “moral luck” to designate non-voluntary variables such as one’s background, circumstances, upbringing, temperament, and other similar factors, which one cannot control but which can have substantial influence on the formation of moral character. Moral luck and its challenge to the notion that one must always be responsible for his or her own moral character helps to clarify the degree to which one should be held responsible for his or her own moral character. This paper concludes that the formation of moral character is not entirely under the control of an individual. Instead, it can be impacted by a wide variety of conditions; the formation of one’s character cannot be solely accomplished by the nature of one’s individual actions, but is rather a collaborative process. Lastly, this paper specifies how one can take responsibility for his or her own character based on an Aristotelian developmental conception of voluntariness and personal responsibility.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Andre, J.(1983)。Nagel, Williams, and moral luck。Analysis,43(4),202-207。
2.
Athanassoulis, N.(2005)。Common-sense virtue ethics and moral luck and moral luck。Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,8(3),265-276。
3.
Brickhouse, T. C.(1991)。Roberts on responsibility for action and character in the Nicomachean ethics。Ancient Philosophy,11(1),137-148。
4.
Carr, D.(2003)。Character and moral choice in the cultivation of virtue。Philosoph,78(304),219-232。
5.
Enoch, D.、Marmor, A.(2007)。The case against moral luck。Law and Philosophy,26(4),405-436。
6.
Kristjánsson, Kristján(2006)。Emulation and the use of role models in moral education。Journal of Moral Education,35(1),37-49。
7.
Latus, A.(2003)。Constitutive luck。Metaphilosophy,34(4),460-475。
8.
van Hooft, S.(2006)。Book reviews: Morality, moral luck and responsibility: Fortune's web。Nursing Ethics,13(1),95-96。
9.
Walker, M. U.(1991)。Moral luck and the virtues of impure agency。Metaphilosophy,22(1/2),14-27。
10.
Zimmerman, M. J.(1987)。Luck and moral responsibility。Ethics,97(2),374-386。
圖書
1.
Aristotle、Ross, D.(1998)。The Nicornachean ethics。Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press。
2.
Hursthouse, R.(1997)。Virtue ethics and the emotions。Virtue ethics. A critical reader。Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press。
3.
McCrae, R. R.(2011)。Personality traits and the potential of positive psychology。Designing positive psychology: Tacking stock and moving forward。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。
4.
Russell, D. C.(2009)。Practical intelligence and the virtues。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
5.
Sabini, J.、Silver, M.(1987)。Emotions, responsibility, and character。Responsibility. character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。
6.
Trianosky, G.(1993)。Natural affection and responsibility for character: A critique of Kantian views of the virtues。Identity, character, and morality: Essays in moral psychology。London, UK:MIT。
7.
Williams, B.(2007)。Ethics and the limits of philosophy。London, UK:Routledge。
8.
Jacob, J.(2001)。Choosing character: Responsibility for virtue and vice。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。
9.
McKinnon, C.(1999)。Character, virtue theories, and the vices。Ontario:Broadview。
10.
Nagel, Thomas(1979)。Mortal Questions。Cambridge University Press。
11.
Williams, Bernard(1981)。Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980。Cambridge University Press。
12.
Nussbaum, Martha C.(2001)。The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy。Cambridge University Press。
13.
Athanassoulis, Nafsika(2005)。Morality, Moral Luck and Responsibility Fortune 's Web。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。
14.
Kupperman, J. J.(1991)。Character。Oxford University Press。
其他
1.
Hsieh, D. M.(2007)。Moral responsibility and moral luck,http://www.dianahsieh.com/docs/mrml.pdf。
圖書論文
1.
Spiecker, B.(1999)。Habituation and training in early moral upbringing。Virtue ethics and moral education。New York, NY:Routledge。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
Urmson超義務理念評析及其品德教育蘊義
2.
中世紀城鎮或計畫性花園城市
3.
評介《品格教育在英國的崛起:英雄、魔龍與品格迷思》
4.
I. Morris幸福課程的哲學檢視
5.
重訪德與福的關係:正向心理學的新詮釋及其對品德教育的啟示
6.
英國品格教育現況評析及其對臺灣品德教育的啟示
7.
評介《亞里斯多德式品格教育》(2015)
8.
Michael Oakeshott論博雅教育及大學教育
9.
Aristotle幸福論觀點下的致福之道與幸福的脆弱性:幸福、運氣與品德教育
10.
歐美國家品德教育發展趨勢與中學概況
11.
品格長處與德行在促成個體幸福/快樂中的角色:評介M. E. P. Seligman著《Authentic Happiness》
12.
The Doctrine of the Unity of the Virtues and Its Implications for Character Education
13.
A Critical Examination of the Appropriateness of Characterising Character Education in Terms of the Inculcation of Virtues
14.
G. Harman與J. Doris社會心理學情境論與德行倫理學的品格辯論及其對品格教育的啟示
15.
品格特質歸因與評量之可行性與做法的哲學省思
QR Code