:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:蘇格拉底與摩呂草--柏拉圖《普羅塔戈拉》引荷馬史詩考
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:賀方嬰
作者(外文):He, Fang-ying
出版日期:2013
卷期:40:11=474
頁次:頁37-55
主題關鍵詞:柏拉圖普羅塔戈拉荷馬奧德賽摩呂草赫爾墨斯奧德修斯蘇格拉底阿爾喀比亞德愛若斯智識PlatoProtagorasHomerOdysseyMolyμώλυHermesOdysseusSocratesAlcibiadesErosἔρωςIntelligence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:52
柏拉圖在《普羅塔戈拉》開場即引入荷馬的詩句顯得意味深長。一方面,他告誡雅典青年人不要因異邦新派智術師的引誘迷失了靈魂;另一方面,他還暗示,哲人蘇格拉底在城邦中施教實際面臨兩類對手:古老的敘事詩人荷馬與新派的智術師。柏拉圖筆下的蘇格拉底與荷馬的關係問題,是詩與哲學之爭的重大面相之一。由於蘇格拉底與智術師之間的差異模糊,蘇格拉底與史詩傳統的關係顯得十分複雜難辨。本文以《普羅塔戈拉》開場蘇格拉底引用荷馬史詩暗喻阿爾喀比亞德為例,通過還原、比較引荷馬史詩在不同語境中的具體意涵,力圖推進對柏拉圖對話作品與史詩傳統之關係的理解。
That Plato quotes from the Homeric poetry in the opening of the ”Protagoras”, where he on the one hand warns the Athenian youth that they should not lose themselves facing the lure of the new sophists from other cities, while on the other, he suggests that Socrates actually has to confront challenges from two different groups, namely Homer, the old narrative poet, as well as the new sophists, is of great significance. The relationship of Socrates and Homer thus is an important facet of the ancient quarrel between poetry and philosophy. Moreover, it is known that Socrates seems to have an obscure distinction with sophists, and that the relationship between Socrates and traditional poets is highly complicated. Taking the beginning of the ”Protagoras”, in which Socrates cites Homeric epic to allude Alcibiade, as an example, this paper tries to reach a thorough understanding of the relationship of Socrates and the epic tradition by restoring and comparing the concrete meaning of Socrates' quotations of Homer in different contexts.
期刊論文
1.Segvic, Heda(200607)。Homer in P!ato's Protagoras。Classical Philology,101(3),247-262。  new window
2.Howes, George Edwin(1895)。Homeric quotation in Plato and Aristotle。Harvard Studies in Classical Philology,6,153-237。  new window
3.Planinc, Zdravko(2003)。Plato through Homer: Poetry and Philosophy in the Cosmological Dialogues。  new window
4.Howland, Jacob(200012)。Xenophon's Phi!osophic Odyssey: On the Anabasis and Plato's Republic。The American Political Science Review,94(4),875-889。  new window
5.Howland, Jacob(1993)。Republic: The Odyssey of Philosophy。Twayne's Masterwork Studies,122。  new window
圖書
1.Xenophon、吳永泉(1984)。回憶蘇格拉底。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.Scott, Gary Alan(2000)。Plato's Socrates as Educator。New York:State University of New York Press, Albany。  new window
3.Homer、D. B. Munro(1920)。Homeri Operain。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Plato、Burnet, John(1903)。Platonis Opera。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Benardete, Seth(2000)。The Argument of the Action: Essays in Greek Poetry and Philosophy。Chicago:The University of Chicago。  new window
6.Thucydides、Lattimore, Steven(1998)。The Peloponnesian War。Hackett Publishing Company。  new window
7.Gilead, Amihud(19940101)。The Platonic Odyssey: A philosophical- literary Inquiry into the Phaedo。Amsterdam:Editions Rodopi。  new window
8.柏拉圖、劉小楓(2003)。會飲。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.柏拉圖、吳飛(2005)。蘇格拉底的申辯。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.柏拉圖、梁中和(2012)。阿爾喀比亞德。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.施特勞斯、邱立波(2010)。論柏拉圖的(會飲)。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.荷馬、羅念生(2004)。伊利亞特。上海:世紀出版集團‧人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.荷馬、王煥生(1997)。奧德賽。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.赫西俄德、吳雅凌(2010)。神譜箋釋。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.羅森、楊俊傑(2011)。柏拉圖的《會飲》。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉小楓。普羅塔戈拉箋注。  延伸查詢new window
17.戈登、劉麒麟、黃莎(2007)。戲劇詩人柏拉圖。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.張文濤、董寶、胥瑾(2010)。神話詩人柏拉圖。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.晏立農、馬淑琴(200601)。古希臘羅馬神話鑑賞辭典。長春:吉林人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE