其他1. | (20130517)。USPTO Considering New Guidance After CLS v Alice,http://www.managingip.com/Article/3207287/Managing-Patents-Archive/USPTO-consideringnew-guidance-after-CLS-v-Alice.html。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
2. | Rantanen, Jason。CLS Bank v. Alice: The "Nothing More Than" Limitation on Abstract Ideas,http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2012/07/cls-bank-v-alice-corp.html。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
3. | Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. Kappos,http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/bilski_guidance_27jul2010.pdf。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
4. | MPEP (E8r8) 2106, Ⅲ: Conduct a thorough search of the prior art,http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/old/E8R8_2100.pdf。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
5. | (20130614)。PTAB delivers final CBM review ruling,http://www.worldipreview.com/news/ptab-delivers-final-cbm-review-ruling。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |