:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣企業於美國國際貿易委員會專利訴訟之實證研究
書刊名:智慧財產權月刊
作者:蘇昱婷劉尚志 引用關係
作者(外文):Su, Yu-tingLiu, Shang-jyh
出版日期:2013
卷期:177
頁次:頁56-104
主題關鍵詞:美國國際貿易委員會337條款國內企業臺灣企業專利訴訟實證研究訴訟策略重新設計ITCPatent litigation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
除了聯邦地方法院,近年來美國國際貿易委員會(ITC)逐漸成為專利訴訟的焦點,ITC 擁有廣泛之對物管轄權且僅須12 至18 個月內即能結案,勝訴之原告幾乎可取得排除命令,種種優勢皆促使專利權人於ITC 起訴。臺灣高居337 條款調查案涉案國家之第二名,本文之研究目的係欲了解臺灣廠商於ITC 之涉訟現況並探詢其中的影響因素,研究方法則以量化方式分析1975 年至2012 年3 月臺灣企業於ITC 訴訟案件之結果、歷時、訴訟行為、產業趨勢及NPEs 案件。結果顯示平均每三至四件337調查案即有一件為臺灣廠商涉案,而近年來臺灣企業為被告之案件,超過半數以ITC 最終決定結案,其敗訴率約六成;案件倘以和解收場平均需10 個月,若以ITC 決定結案則需16 個月;涉訟產業則以高科技產業為主,多為半導體、面板與智慧型手機等產業;另約四分之一的臺灣案件為專利事業體(NPEs 或Patent Troll,專利蟑螂)所提起,面臨NPEs訴訟時,臺灣被告之和解意願則自平均之四成提高至六成。本文探尋臺灣企業於ITC 訴訟之特色與影響因素,並輔以實證觀察試提出訴訟建議,期能助當事人於ITC 應訴時更有效率地分配資源並管理風險,提高勝訴機率並將訴訟成本降至最低,維持臺灣企業之競爭力以求持續創新發展。
期刊論文
1.Lance, Holly(2010)。Not So Technical: An Analysis Of Federal Circuit Patent Decisions Appealed From The ITC。Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review,17(1),243-297。  new window
2.Allison, John R.、Lemley, Mark A.、Moore, Kimberly A.、Trunkey, R. Derek(2004)。Valuable Patents。Georgetown Law Journal,92(3),435-480。  new window
3.Chien, Colleen V.(2008)。Patently Protectionist? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Cases at the International Trade Commission。William & Mary Law Review,50,63-87。  new window
4.Hahn, Robert W.、Singer, Hal J.(2008)。Assessing Bias in Patent Infringement Cases: A Review of International Trade Commission Decisions。Harvard Journal of Law and Technology,21(2),457-508。  new window
5.Kesan, Jay P.、Ball, Gwendolyn G.(2006)。How Are Patent Cases Resolved? An Empirical Examination of the Adjudication and Settlement of Patent Disputes。Washington University Law Review,84,237-312。  new window
6.Sherman, B.(1982)。Successful Marketing Strategy for High Tech Firms。Journal of Retailing,58,25-43。  new window
7.馮震宇(20111100)。宏達電與蘋果專利爭訟凸顯智財與併購結合之趨勢。月旦法學,198,250-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Evans, Mark Fox(2011)。Trending Upward: Important Trends under Section 337 at the U.S. International Trade Commission。Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property,18(14),1。  new window
9.Lemley, Mark A.、Shapiro, Carl(2007)。Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking。Texas Law Review,85(7),1991-2049。  new window
10.Sterne, Robert Greene(2011)。Patent Enforcement Under Section 337 Before The United States International Trade Commission: Evolution Of The Forum To Address A Non-Manufacturing Marketplace。The Sedona Conference Journal,12,211-221。  new window
11.Diehl, Michael(2011)。Does ITC Review Of Administrative Law Judge Determinations Add Value In Section 337 Investigations?。Fed. Circuit B. J.,21,119-134。  new window
圖書
1.經濟部智慧財產局(2012)。美國專利訴訟教戰手冊:光電產業專利趨勢與專利訴訟研究計畫。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Barquist, Charles S.、王耀本(2004)。美國國際貿易委員會(ITC)訴訟實務。財團法人亞太智慧財產權發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Grossman, Barry L.、Hoffman, Gary M.(2010)。Patent Litigation Strategies Handbook。  new window
其他
1.ITC Annual Performance Report Fiscal Year 2011,United States International Trade Commission。,http://www.usitc.gov/press_room/documents/USITCFY2011APR.pdf。  new window
2.Administrative Law Judge Photos,United States International Trade Commission。,http://www.usitc.gov/press_room/alj_photos.htm。  new window
3.All 337 Investigations,United States International Trade Commission。,http://info.usitc.gov/ouii/public/337inv.nsf/All?OpenView。  new window
4.Number of investigations instituted by calendar year,United States International Trade Commission。,http://www.usitc.gov/intellectual_property/documents/cy_337_institutions.pdf。  new window
5.ITC Budget Justification Fiscal Year 2013,United States International Trade Commission。,http://www.usitc.gov/press_room/documents/budget_2013.pdf。  new window
6.經濟部(2008)。從OEM/ODM到自創品牌之策略--Branding導向的IP經營模式,http://www.mmot.nccu.edu.tw/download/appear/97-1.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
7.科技產業資訊室。蘋果再度於美國ITC法院控告宏達電,http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/pclass/2011/pclass_11_A172.htm。  延伸查詢new window
8.科技產業資訊室(20110816)。Google宣布以125億收購摩托羅拉移動之觀察,http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/pclass/2011/pclass_11_A197.htm。  延伸查詢new window
9.(2008)。Highlights of ITC Investigations,FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP。,http://www.finnegan.com/resources/articles/articlesdetail.aspx?news=778d244d-6b71-4092-a7d5-1905b6037ccc。  new window
10.Fisher, Jeffrey M.。The Pros and Cons of Patent Litigation before the International Trade Commission,FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL LLP。,http://www.fbm.com/files/Publication/c9cfa87b-6d15-46b3-ac02-89600a3c7c90/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/f3c093b9-ab1c-47a6-811e-9061e5354a94/381f0cc6-b7fa-4f90-a21d-3e4c72b4b22f_document.pdf。  new window
11.What A Paralegal Should Know about the International Trade Commission Investigations,http://www.ibislegal.com/ibis-corner/itc/。  new window
12.Top Ten Considerations When Preparing a Patent Infringement Complaint Before the United States International Trade Commission,STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX。,http://64.237.99.107/media/pnc/7/media.1617.pdf。  new window
13.Section 337 Proceedings Part 2 of 3: From Institution to Final Determination by the International International Trade Commission,MAYER BROWN INTERNATIONAL LLP。,http://www.mayerbrown.com/public_docs/11-18-09_IP_ITCP2_Webinar.pdf。  new window
14.NPEs Increasingly Opt for ITC Action,http://www.rpxcorp.com/index.cfm?pageid=14&itemid=20。  new window
15.American Intellectual Property Law Association Report of the Economic Survey,http://www.patentinsurance.com/iprisk/aipla-survey/。  new window
16.Section 337 Update - ITC Issues Advisory Opinion in GPS Devices,STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP。,http://www.steptoe.com/publications-6994.html。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE