:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:巍巖李柬之「實事」論管窺--朝鮮儒人物性同異論爭中「同論」之代表思想
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:安載晧
作者(外文):Ahn, Jae-ho
出版日期:2013
卷期:40:12=475
頁次:頁135-152
主題關鍵詞:巍巖李柬人物性同異論五常未發明德實事本然之心氣質之心理氣同實心性一致Woei-Ahm Yi-ganInmoolsungdongyironHuman being and an animal have same natureOsangFive constanciesMibalNot-yet actualizes consciousnessMyoungdukBrilliant virtueSilsaPractical affairsBonyounjisimOriginal nature of mindGijiljisimMaterial force of mindYigidongsilBoth the principle and material force are substantialRealSimsungilchiMind and nature are same and one
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
巍巖李柬是位人物性同論者,而其道德哲學可以實事概念為頂點來系統化。實事對於他,只是要達到純善的真正未發境界以及其方法論而已。在他看來,真正的未發不但是尚未出現感情的狀態,而更是虛靈不昧的心體即明德引導駁雜的氣質而直接實現純善的性理之境界。這也是「理氣同實、心性一致」的具體意謂。在此脈絡裡,完整無缺地發揮明德之功能的工夫乃無比重要,而明德則成為道德實踐的直接根據。然而,明德雖不只是氣質,但還是屬於氣,並不是純善的理,而是一種卓越的認知能力,所以能夠規範主宰一身而已。在道德實踐另有最終根據,那就是作為萬物共同存在根據的理稟賦給各個事物的性,而其具體內容則五常。巍巖這種道德哲學是徹底跟隨朱子學尤其栗谷學展開的。「五常辯」是由「理通氣局」──依據「理無形而氣有形」──主張的性論,「未發辯」則強調明德的,是根源上依從「心是氣」和朱子所謂心之本體的心論,「實事論」乃是跟隨「氣發理乘一途」說──依據「理無為而氣有為」──展開的工夫論。我們肯定巍巖的窮極關懷在於實事論,那麼可說它是朱子學至少栗谷學道德理論的最圓滿性體系。
Woei-Ahm is an Inmoolsungdongronja (a scholar who supports the theory that human being and an animal have same nature). His idea of Silsa (Practical Affairs) is the core of his whole philosophy. To Woei-Ahm, the Practical Affairs is the method to reach the pure good, the state of true Mibal (not-yet actualizes consciousness). In his view, true Mibal is not mere state which one's feeling is not expressed, but which disordered disposition could reveal the pure Principle of Heaven through being led by enlightening, pure and brilliant Virtue passes through body and mind. It is also definite meaning of ”Ligidongsil” (both the Principle and Material Force are substantial, real) and ”Simsungilchi” (mind and nature are one and same). In this light, Kongbu (disciplinal study, learning and cultivating one's mind) which enable the Virtue to manifest itself has to become very important. At the same time, the brilliant Virtue becomes a fundamental basis for putting morality into practice. However' despite not being same with disposition, the brilliant Virtue is subjected to Gi (Material Force, Ether). It cannot be purely good, but can control and preside over human being as a remarkable cognitive ability. Therefore, there is a separate and ultimate basis of ethical behaviours: the very Sung (human nature), bestowed universal Principle of all existence, Li. More definitely saying, its substance Osang (Five Constancies).Woei-Ahm's philosophy developed entirely based on the Zhu-Xi school, especially Youlgok sector school. Osang theory is the Sung theory based on Youlgok's Litonggigook (the Principle applies universally, Ether does individually.), his Mibal debate is Simron (the Mind theory) based on Simzeukgi (Mind is Ether) and Zhu-Xi's brilliant Virtue which is regarded as the origin of Mind, and Silsa theory is his disciplinal study theory which progressed from Gibal-Liseung-Ildo (there is no different way except Gi arouses and Li rides). Therefore Woei-Ahm's philosophy can be regarded as the most satisfying system of Zhu-Xi's ethic, c least of Youlgok sector's.
期刊論文
1.文錫胤(2002)。巍巖李東和南塘韓元震的人物性同異論辯研究。東方學志,2002(118)。  延伸查詢new window
2.李天承(2010)。巍巖之未發說和心性一致的修養論。哲學研究,40。  延伸查詢new window
3.李天承(2008)。巍巖李柬之本心涵養修養論研究。韓國思想和文化,2008(45)。  延伸查詢new window
4.金起賢(2004)。巍巖和南塘的未發論之道德哲學上的背景。東洋哲學研究,39。  延伸查詢new window
5.崔英辰(2008)。再檢討南塘/巍巖的未發論辯。東洋哲學研究,29。  延伸查詢new window
6.文錫胤(2008)。湖洛論爭形成期未發論辨的樣相和巍巖「未發」論的特徵。韓國思想史學,2008(31)。  延伸查詢new window
7.Jeong Yeon Woo(200612)。巍巖李柬之心性一致論研究。韓國思想史學,27。  延伸查詢new window
8.Jeong Duck Hee(200303)。巍巖李柬之道德人形成論。教育學研究,41(1)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.裵宗鎬(1984)。李柬的人物性俱同論。韓國的思想。首爾:民音社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李珥(1996)。栗谷先生全書。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
3.韓元震(1998)。南塘先生文集。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
4.權尚夏(1997)。寒水齋先生文集。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
5.李柬(1997)。巍巖遺稿。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
6.安泳翔(1994)。巍巖李東人物性同論和二性二心論。人性物性論。韓國:韓國思想史研究會。  延伸查詢new window
7.尹絲淳(1994)。人性物性同異論辯研究。人性物性論。韓國:韓國思想史研究會。  延伸查詢new window
8.裵宗鎬(1985)。湖洛論爭中的人物性同異論。韓國儒學之哲學展開。首爾:延世大學校出版部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.金炯璨(1995)。人類和萬物的差別性檢討。從論爭看韓國哲學。遼寧:藝文書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE