臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Section 337 of the US Tariff Act in the Context of United States Obligations under the WTO Legal Framework with Focus on Patent Enforcement Measures
書刊名：智慧財產評論
作者：Herrera, Daniel
出版日期：2013
卷期：11:2
頁次：頁173-226
主題關鍵詞：美國國際貿易委員會；美國貿易法第337條；世界貿易組織；關貿總協定；國民待遇；ITC；Section 337；WTO；GATT；National treatment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:60
最近幾年中，由於被作為專利訴訟之場地，美國國際貿易委員會(ITC)聚集了學術界，商界和世界貿易組織(WTO)的關注。批評者的觀點認為，第337條有潛力成為「保護主義模殺傷性武器」。另一方面支持者則認為第337條不過是與TRIPS意旨相符之邊境執法機制，並且對於美國專利法之實施有其必要性。為了論證究竟第337條之批評者與支持者哪一方立場較妥適，本文章分析第337條的程序以及與應與WTO架構一致之部分期能獲得相關結論。
In the latest years the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has gathered the attention of the academia, the business community and the World Trade Organization (WTO) due to its role as a venue for patent litigation. In the view of critics, Section 337 has the potential of becoming a weapon of ＂protectionist mass destruction＂. In the view of its supporters, on the other hand, Section 337 is no more than a regular border enforcement mechanism totally in harmony with TRIPS and necessary to enforce US patent legislation. This paper analyzes Section 337 proceedings and the applicable WTO framework with which Section 337 should be in harmony in order to reach a conclusion as to whether Section 337 critics or its defenders hold the better arguments.
期刊論文
1.Caplen, Robert A.(2007)。Underscoring International Trade Commission Review of Initial Determinations and Federal Circuit Appeals from Final Commission Determinations Under Section 337。Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J.，17，341-351。  new window
2.Catherine Y. Co.(2013)。How Valuable Are the Patents Behind Section 337 Cases?。The World Economy，27(4)，525-536。  new window
3.Krupka, R. G.、Swain, P. C.、Levine, R. E.(1992)。Section 337 and the GATT: The Problem or the Solution?。Am. U. Int'l L. Rev，42，842。  new window
4.Anne Elise Herold Li(2006)。Is the Federal Circuit Affecting US Treaties? The ITC, 271 (G), GATT/ TRIPS & the KINIK Decision。Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J.，16，601-608。  new window
5.Mutti, John、Yeung, Bernard(1996)。Section 337 and the Protection of Intellectual Property in the United States: The Complainants and the Impact。The Review of Economics and Statistics，78，510-520。  new window
6.Rogers, Joel W.、Whitlock, Joseph P.(2002)。Is Section 337 Consistent with the GATT and the TRIPs Agreement?。American University International Law Review，17(3)，459-525。  new window
7.Shriver, Ernest P.(1996)。Separate but Equal: Intellectual Proeprty Importation and the Recent Amendments to Section 337。Minn. J. Global Trade，337，441。  new window
8.Watson, K. W.(2012)。Still a Protectionist Trade Remedy: The Case for Repealing Section 337。Policy Analysis，708，2。  new window
9.Chien, Colleen V.(2008)。Patently Protectionist? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Cases at the International Trade Commission。Wm. & Mary L. Rev.，50，63。  new window
研究報告
1.(19970905)。India - Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products。  new window
圖書
1.Menell, Peter S.、Brian, Busey G.、Cordell, Ruffin、Davis, Mark G.、Powers, Matthew D.(2010)。Section 337 Patent Investigation Management Guide。  new window
2.Correa, Carlos M.(2007)。Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights--A Commentary on the TRIPS Agreement。  new window
其他
1.Correa, Carlos，Third World Network(2013)。The Trips Agreement and Developing Countries，http://web.cenet.org.cn/upfile/109807.pdf， 2013/10/15。  new window
2.Silke von Lewinski(2013)。Intellectual Property Nationality, and Non-discrimination，http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_unhchr_ip_pnl_98/wipounhchr_ip_ pnl 98_6.pdf， 2013/10/23。  new window
3.Famey, Bryan(20080326)。An Overview of Section 337 Actions in the ITC，http://corporate.findlaw.com/intellectual-property/an-overview-of-section-337- actions-in-the-itc.html， 2013/10/16。  new window
4.The WTO Agreements，http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/ whatis e/inbrief e/inbr03_e.htm， 2013/10/15。  new window
5.A unique contribution，http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/ whatis_e/tif e/disp 1 e.htm， 2013/10/15。  new window
6.Schaumberg, Tom M.(199503)。A Revitalized Section 337 to Prohibit Unfairly Traded Imports，http://www.adduci.com/articles/A%20 Revitalized%20Section%20337%20To%20Prohibit%20Unfairly%20Traded%20 Imports， 2013/10/15。  new window
7.Davies, Chris(20100521)。HTC sue Apple; petition ITC to freeze US iPhone, iPad & iPod imports，http://www.slashgear.com/htc-sue-apple-petition-itc-to-freeze- us-iphone-ipad-ipod-imports-1285396， 2013/10/15。  new window
8.Albanesius, Chloe(20121025)。ITC Finds Samsung Guilty of Infringing Apple Patents，http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2411397,00.asp， 2013/10/15。  new window
9.(20111219)。ITC Bans Import of HTC Android Devices in Apple Patent Fight，http://www.pcmag.cOm/article2/0,2817,2397832,00.asp， 2013/10/15。  new window
10.Dawson, Gloria(20121206)。Is Apple starting to move manufacturing back to the US to get away from its competitors?，http://qz.com/34628/is-apple-starting-to-move- manufacturing-back-to-the-us-to-get-away-from-its-competitors/， 2013/10/15。  new window
11.Shah, Agam(20121002)。Lenovo to open first U.S. manufacturing plant in N.C.，http://www.computerworld.eom/s/article/9231969/Lenovo_to_open first_U.S._manufacturing_plant_in_N.C._， 2013/10/25。  new window
12.(20111205)。The Android Patent War，http://online.wsj.com/ news/articles/SB10001424052970204826704577074523539966352， 2013/10/25。  new window
13.Wadhwa, Vivek(20120723)。The End of Chinese Manufacturing and Rebirth of U.S. Industry，http://www.forbes.com/sites/singularity/2012/07/23/the-end-of- chinese-manufacturing-and-rebirth-of-u-s-industry/， 2013/10/25。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：577（臺灣：553，外國：24） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67981174
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上