近三十年來，在跨文化、學科交叉的全球學術語境下，漢語學界對中國文學文獻的研究，尤以傳統、謹慎、守正的姿態，維繫著古典學術之固有尊嚴。但由此形成的該學科舉步維艱之發展現狀，也引起了諸多有識之士的憂慮和持續關注。臺灣學生書局新近推出陳廣宏教授的《文本、史案與實證》一書，便是這種憂患意識的一次集中體現。在領會這一反思精神的基礎上，書評人試圖通過與圖書作者及學界同仁的交流，進一步主張中國文學的實證研究，實有必要擺脫具體個案或單元研究的文獻層累之法，轉而提倡重視「過程」和「關係」研究的治學態度。若能超越二十世紀的強大而堅固的靜態考證傳統，邁向更符合二十一世紀學術特徵的動態思維方式，古典文學的實證研究或能闢出一片更廣闊的學術天地。

Recently 30 years, based on the background of cross-cultural and interdisciplinary research, the general trend of academic research about Chinese documentation is traditional and conservative. By this attitude, the seriousness of classical academic seemed to be maintained. On the other hand, this attitude also impacted development of the subject, it attracts wide attention from many scholars who think it imperiled the vitality of classical academic. Written by Chen Guang-hong, published by Student Book Co., Ltd., Text, individual cases and textual research give full expression to this sense. Based on this spirit of retrospection, the author thought if the textual research want to improve, it's necessary for scholarly research to focus on process and relationship, meanwhile, get rid of the method that emphasize on case study is also need. If we can emphasis on dynamic state instead of static state, the textual research in classical academic may have vast potential for future development.