資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.117.75.70)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
An Integrated Peer Review Design in an EFL Basic Writing Class
書刊名:
國立臺中科技大學通識教育學報
作者:
張淑英
/
董綺安
作者(外文):
Chang, Shu-ying
/
Tung, Chi-an
出版日期:
2013
卷期:
2
頁次:
頁253-275
主題關鍵詞:
面對面同儕互評
;
線上同儕互評
;
英語為外語之寫作教學
;
回饋
;
Face-to-face peer review
;
Computer-mediated peer review
;
EFL writing instruction
;
Feedback
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
2
點閱:22
同儕互評運用在過程導向寫作教學已行之多年,但出現的一些問題卻也削弱了此教學活動的成效,其中最令人詬病的是學生無法以批判性的思考去評量同儕作品。為解決這個問題,本研究結合線上同儕互評與教師引導面對面口頭互評兩要素,形成「整合式同儕互評」的設計,實施於大一英文寫作班。此小規模探索性研究的目的在於探討此「整合式同儕互評」的設計對下列三方面的影響:(1) 學生同儕互評的技能、(2) 學生英文寫作的整體能力及 (3) 學生對此設計的看法。本研究透過前後測、學生反思式日誌及問卷,以驗證研究成效。結果,不論是量化或質化資料皆顯示:融入「整合式同儕互評」於英語為外語之基礎寫作教學對上述三個研究項目皆有正面的影響。
以文找文
Although peer review has been used in process-oriented writing instruction for years, some problems have been reported to impair the efficacy of such an activity. Among them, the most cited one has been students’ inability to critically evaluate peer writing. To solve the problem, an integrated peer review design, consisting of computer-mediated peer review and teacher-guided face-to-face oral peer review, was experimented in a college freshman English writing class in central Taiwan. The purpose of the small-scale exploratory study was to examine the effects of infusing such a design in EFL basic writing instruction on (1) students’ peer critiquing skills, (2) their overall English writing proficiency, and (3) their perception of this design. Pretests, posttests, reflective journals, and a teacher-designed survey were used as instruments to measure the effects of the design. Both quantitative and qualitative results showed that incorporating the integrated peer review design into EFL basic writing instruction could positively affect students’ peer critiquing skills, their overall English writing proficiency, and their perception of this design.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Lee, Y. -J.(2006)。The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges。Journal of Second Language Writing,15(4),307-330。
2.
Lundstrom, K.、Baker, W.(2009)。To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing。Journal of Second Language Writing,18(1),30-43。
3.
Topping, K. J.(2009)。Peer assessment。Theory Into Practice,48(1),20-27。
4.
DiGiovanni, E.、Nagaswami, G.(2001)。Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face?。ELT Journal,55(3),263-272。
5.
Chang, C.-F.(2009)。Peer review through synchronous and asynchronous CMC modes: A case study in a Taiwanese college English writing course。The JALT CALL Journal,5(1),45-64。
6.
Crisp, B. R.(2007)。Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students' subsequent submission of assessable work。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,32(5),571-581。
7.
Graner, M. H.(1987)。Revision workshops: An alternative to peer editing groups。English Journal,76(3),40-45。
8.
Thompson, C.(2002)。Teaching critical thinking in EAP courses in Australia。TESOL Journal,11(4),15-20。
9.
Tsui, A. B. M.、Ng, M.(2000)。Do secondaiy L2 writers benefit from peer comments。Journal of Second Language Writing,9(2),147-170。
10.
董綺安、張淑英、彭芳美(20130600)。A Better Form of Peer Review with the Integration of Critical Thinking Training in an EFL Writing Class--CMPR or OPPR?。逢甲人文社會學報,26,95-127。
11.
Beveridge, Ian(1997)。Teaching Your Students to Think Reflectively: The Case for Reflective Journals。Teaching in Higher Education,2(1),33-43。
12.
Hyland, F.、Hyland, K.(2001)。Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback。Journal of Second Language Writing,10(3),185-212。
13.
McGroarty, M. E.、Zhu, W.(1997)。Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision。Language Learning,47(1),1-43。
14.
Min, Hui-Tzu(2005)。Training students to become successful peer reviewers。System,33(2),293-308。
15.
Min, H.(2006)。The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality。Journal of Second Language Writing,15(2),118-141。
16.
Berg, E. C.(1999)。The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality。Journal of Second Language Writing,8(3),215-241。
17.
Liu, J.、Sadler, R. W.(2003)。The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing。Journal of English for Academic Purposes,2(3),193-227。
18.
Ho, M. C.、Savignon, S. J.(2007)。Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing。CALICO Journal,24(2),269-290。
19.
Tuzi, F.(2004)。The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course。Computers and Composition,21,217-235。
會議論文
1.
Chiu, C.(2008)。An investigation of peer evaluation in EFL college writing。25 th International Conference of English Teaching and Learning。Taipei。
2.
Palmer, S.、Holt, D.、Bray, S.(2008)。The learning outcomes of an online reflective journal in engineering。The ascilite。Melbourne, Australia。
3.
Soares, C. J.(2004)。Peer review methods for ESL writing improvement. Online submission。annual meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages。Seattle, WA。
圖書
1.
Langan, J.(2002)。English skills with readings。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。
2.
Hatch, Evelyn、Lazaraton, Anne(1991)。The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics。Heinle & Heinle Publishers。
其他
1.
Bostock, S.(2000)。Student peer assessment,http://www.palatine.ac.uk/files/994.pdf。
2.
(2001)。McGraw-Hill PageOut,http://syjchang.asia.pageout.net。
3.
Olsen, W.(2004)。Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed,http://research.apc.Org/images/5/54/Triangulation.pdf。
4.
Reynolds, L.(2013)。Giving student feedback: 20 tips to do it right,http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/giving-student-feedback/。
5.
Wilson, L. O.(2006)。Beyong Bloom - Anew version of the cognitive taxonomy,http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomy.htm。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
Writing Responses to Images When Developing Higher-order Thinking: A Case Study of EFL College Students in Taiwan
2.
A Better Form of Peer Review with the Integration of Critical Thinking Training in an EFL Writing Class--CMPR or OPPR?
1.
從複雜理論觀點探索英語學習者的自主發展過程
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code